Oh, buddy! There are several salient points I'm trying to discuss. Points that you brought up yourself: the implied un-manliness of refraining from meat; how/why the average Westerner is so addicted to animal products to the point of becoming "miserable" without; the staving off of long-term interests for immediate and short-term gratification... and we can talk about a few of these concepts outside the realm of diet.
You shy away from serious discussion because you know you've never had anything more than "muh bacon" "muh ancestors" and "who wants to be old anyway!"
And you know that those fallacious "arguments" hold no ground against mine. I did tell
@intlzncster not to make me shame you...
Care to refute anything? Or are you only interested in trying to invalidate my aruments with my irrelevant age and a single irrelevant subordinate clause?
Please flex your intellect and bury my arguments.