- Joined
- Feb 10, 2012
- Messages
- 3,333
- Reaction Score
- 5,054
like it our not, there is a clear trend building in that the successful G5 coaches are targeted for P5 vacancies. If Diaco has a successful 3rd season he could very well be in Fuentes and Ruhle's position a year from now. That's reality in the G5 world. I give Houston a ton of credit for upping the ante to keep their guy. That's not going to prevent Herman from leaving for the likes of a Top 25-30 program, but it sends a message to a bulk of the P5 schools that the cost of poaching just went way up... Uconn could very well be in that position in the next year or two.Bizlaw's point is dead on. Folks are taking it as absolutes. It's not.
Diaco is adequately compensated given his experience and accomplishments to date. He's not going anywhere after this season. If he continues a solid trend he will probably be around here for a while and UCONN will compensate him to market. If he is wildly successful one of the monsters will waive money beyond anything UCONN could consider and then Diaco will set himself and his family up for life. That scenario is far from a bad one for UCONN at this stage in our development.
One thing that I find very hypocritical is that fans, in general, call for a coach's head after almost every loss and then many of those same fans complain about the lack of loyalty from said coach. These guys play in a high stakes game and they would be crazy not to grab dollars when they can. Most of them are a season away from the unemployment line.
Assuming Diaco wins 9/10 games each of the next two years and challenges for the AAC championship, does he get a $3M contract?

