Dooley
Done with U-con athletics
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- Messages
- 9,960
- Reaction Score
- 32,818
Can someone explain to me in simple words why you would give Diaco a substantial raise/extension after a 6-6 season? CFB coaching history is littered with many coaches that create a financial disincentive for their employer to let them go when they fail to produce on a consistent basis when they get an increase and contact extension after 1 good year. Good for the coaches, bad for the school.
I believe Diaco is one of the top compensated coaches in the AAC (prior to the recent Houston coach's new contract). I believe that his contract probably had performance bonuses for things like a bowl game. Maybe add 1 year and give him a little bump, but wait for the big change in contract until after he has consistent success.
Anything you read in the press about Diaco today, 95% is being put out there by his agent. Hopefully he is not like Schiano and takes his name out of consideration for jobs he was never offered.
I wouldn't. But I'm just saying that to lure him to Syracuse or Rutgers, two rosters that need to be completely rebuilt like ours in 2014, they would have to offer him more than what we are paying him - $1.5M/yr. It doesn't make sense to give a coach with a 8-16 record $2.5-$3M/yr money. For that kind of money, you can find a much more proven candidate. It also doesn't make sense for Diaco to leave here for the same money he would get from UConn at Syracuse/Rutgers. He's on the verge of his year 3 season with a talented roster and higher expectations that either Cuse/RU. If he wins 8+ games, you can bet on Diaco being a hot commodity during next offseason's silly season.