Diaco channelling Belicheck | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Diaco channelling Belicheck

Status
Not open for further replies.
Frankly, I think they were just a bad matchup for us -- they don't make many mistakes and they challenge you to outscore them -- not exactly a wheelhouse opponent for us.
 
player coach concept

fan base seems unhappy with learning curve of new coach

as an enrichment program to help reduce said curve,

if said gent has any remaining eligibility,

maybe he would like to enroll in masters program in school of physical education and concurrently get a first hand look at what is going on the gridiron by suiting up and filling his old role of linebacker on d side and maybe see o for first time maybe as a pretend qb to get the full ImpacT of proposed training program to allow UCONN to have a fully certified head coach sooner rather than too later

mlb is well known for implementing successfully the playercoach concept

has foosball ever done it on college or nfl level?

if not, now is the time
 
Diaco makes nuanced points, which is a mistake when you'e communicating with large masses of people. Your typical bell curve individual can't handle/adequately process these points, which leads to threads like this. I hope making these threads and essays and contributing to the internet hivemind feels constructive and feels as though it is worth your time and mental energy. Because, you know, duck a hobby.

It's highly entertaining to me at least. Losing sucks, but at least I get to come here for the weekly meltdown. Don't ever change.
 
Diaco makes nuanced points, which is a mistake when you'e communicating with large masses of people.

Yeah. "Nuanced." Like when he says we used to be colossally bad, but now we are just bad. So many subtle points he's making there. I have a hard time dealing with it... :rolleyes:
 
Yeah. "Nuanced." Like when he says we used to be colossally bad, but now we are just bad. So many subtle points he's making there. I have a hard time dealing with it... :rolleyes:
Yup this is pretty much exactly what I'm talking about hahahhaha keep it up man
 
Yup this is pretty much exactly what I'm talking about hahahhaha keep it up man

I will, bro. And you feel free to chime in with whatever it was that you thought was "nuanced" about his statements. I'm quite sure you won't be back to show us one of the "nuances" and why we've missed it. But thanks for playing...
 
.-.
Diaco makes nuanced points, which is a mistake when you'e communicating with large masses of people. Your typical bell curve individual can't handle/adequately process these points, which leads to threads like this. I hope making these threads and essays and contributing to the internet hivemind feels constructive and feels as though it is worth your time and mental energy. Because, you know, duck a hobby.

It's highly entertaining to me at least. Losing sucks, but at least I get to come here for the weekly meltdown. Don't ever change.
Professor Gruber, is that you? We are too dumb to understand his nuance. Got it
 
Nuances like our starting QB is not Key, and in fact is not as good as his backup, who is Key.
 
I will, bro. And you feel free to chime in with whatever it was that you thought was "nuanced" about his statements. I'm quite sure you won't be back to show us one of the "nuances" and why we've missed it. But thanks for playing...
You can lead a horse to water....
 
.-.
Yesterday Mike and Mike had someone on from Chicago, and they were talking about the Bears D and the debacle against GB on Sunday night.

Basic gist was:

You have to scheme your D around the dumbest person on your D. One guy not in concert with the rest of the scheme can ruin everything, which is exactly why Rodgers picked them apart on Sunday.

Just keep this in mind when we want Diaco to come up with complete schemes to play unconventional offenses. Given the time, he might have just chosen to contain the damage and hope to outscore them (which obviously we didn't).
 
Yesterday Mike and Mike had someone on from Chicago, and they were talking about the Bears D and the debacle against GB on Sunday night.

Basic gist was:

You have to scheme your D around the dumbest person on your D. One guy not in concert with the rest of the scheme can ruin everything, which is exactly why Rodgers picked them apart on Sunday.

Just keep this in mind when we want Diaco to come up with complete schemes to play unconventional offenses. Given the time, he might have just chosen to contain the damage and hope to outscore them (which obviously we didn't).

I'm not concerned one bit about Diaco's ability to supervise the construction of an effective defense both personnel and schematic and game plans designed to best use his own defensive personnel, and defend against an opponent's offense and stop them from moving the ball and/or scoring effectively.

I am concerned a whole hell of a lot about Diaco's ability to supervise the construction of a complete game plan for an opponent, that addresses all three phases of the game, and emphasizes using is own personnel, in all three phases of the game, to best put our entire team in position to emphasize our own strengths and attack an opponents weaknesses in all three phases, to put our team in best position to win games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,372
Messages
4,568,755
Members
10,474
Latest member
MyStore24


Top Bottom