- Joined
- Nov 8, 2011
- Messages
- 1,886
- Reaction Score
- 3,442
Just because it's snide and unintelligent doesn't mean it's not true.Ha LOL - I expected more from you --- I was trying to cut off the snide unintelligent comment.

Last year, with the QB situation we were not going to win more than 6-7 games.We have a lack of talent alright, in the coaching department. The in game management of personnel, clock, play calling, adjustments on the offensive side of the ball were...offensive. We had a top 20 defense and a bottom 5 offense. Explain how we have the talent to go on the road and beat BE Co-Champion and BCS bound Louisville, but not the talent to beat NCSU at home, WMU, Temple at home, and USF (3 of those schools fired their coaches this year and the other that just moved up from the MAC).
Maybe where DC is confused is we're not talking about having the talent to win the BE the past two years, we're not talking about the talent to be 10-2, 9-3... We are talking about the talent to win 6 or more games against a relatively weak schedule and get us in a bowl game. I still believe with our personnel and our schedule the past two years we were very capable of reaching anywhere from 7 to 9 wins/year.
IMO, more often than not, coaches win and lose close games a much if not more than players. I have heard people/reporters mention how we are a play away in 4 games of being 9-3. Bullsh!t. We are also a play or two away from losing to UMd, UB, Pitt, and UL. The reality is we are as close if not closer to being 1-11 than we are to 9-3. What a joke.
But I'm not being snide but serious. Look, the head coach is ultimately responsible for everything in a program -- the good and the bad. And he is Brown's boss, and is absolutely entitled to share in the blame and praise on the defensive end. (While I think Brown has done fine, I'm not awarding him the assistant of the year awards either based on the last two years.)
But his relationship with GDL is in fact different. They have been together longer than my two sons in their twenties have been alive, and found each other not just as Syracuse but in the NFL. They are in fact joined at the hip, and P has to be more responsible for what happens with his friend (good or bad) than with an outside, arms length hire that he makes.
OK - that I can buy (not that you were selling). PP doesn't get the credit for the success of the D because the O is so bad.
The talent level is not marginally higher or lower than when Edsall coached. A few NFL caliber players on defense, one, maybe two on offense.
The difference is Edsall was an average recruiter who can (and had assistants who can) coach players up. Don Brown coached players up. Look at the improvement in performance of the defense from the first few games last year to this year. And he did after losing almost his entire defensive line (which had all big east starters).
Pasqualoni and Deleone can't coach players up. I don't know what Deloene is good at. Pasqualoni needs 3-4 years for "his guys" because he has to get by on his talent making him look like a better coach than he is. Edsall and his staff helped two walk-ons into the NFL. Took guys nobody else was looking at for their position, and helped them to the NFL.
Pasqualoni has to recruit those players that already have NFL potential, because he isn't going to caoch anyone up to that level. He was able to do that at Fruit U for a number of years, they had more history and a fewer built-in recruiting advantages. With our conference situation, stadium size/location, and relative lack of in-state talent, it will be incredibly difficult for him to do that here.
A marginal recruiter, great developer of talent, and decent game day coach, will get you 7-5 on average. Take his players and give them to a ****ty game day coach and you'll get 5-7. If the uptick didn't start last year, we are screwed until we find a coach who can make second half adjustments.
But this is exactly why the hire was so duck*ing dumb. Even if you didn't know P would be as bad a coach as he has been here, it still didn't make sense. He was never going to win with Edsall's guys. Him winning would require 4 or 5 years of bringing in his own, presumably more talented, guys based on his being a better recruiter. The problem with that strategy, obviously, is that by the time you're into P's 4th and 5th years, and you're now hoping to get ahead of where we were, P's age is such that he could be slowing down, if not out, at any moment.
It was never just P's age -- it was P's age added to the 4 or 5 years any idiot (thank you Jeff hathaway) should have known it would take P to improve the program.
Please tell me what players on offense are NFL calibre - and leave out Ryan Griffin and John Delahunt - because neither was NFL calibre prior to P and D arriving.
The part that baffles me is that Edsall, who was such a great coach, is also failing -- even worse -- with much better talent in Maryland.
So how do we draw the conclusion that Edsall is such an obvious upgrade over Pasqualoni?
I don't believe Delahunt is NFL caliber.
Ryan Griffin was NFL caliber from the moment he took his redshirt off. Size, speed, and talent. All the coaches needed to do was not screw him up. He'll give the coaches a lot of credit, that speaks to the quality of his character, more than the quality of the coaches. The results speak for themselves on that front. Look at the offensive stats.
But if you think Pasqualoni and GDL are great TE coaches, I won't argue. If I could I'd help them back to the NFL in that very capacity.
Kendall Reyes and Trevardo Williams (both recruited by the prior coach) were both destined for the league with competent coaching. Hank Hughes is still around right? Just checking.
If you want to make the argument they are capable of coaching up players the way the prior staff did, please do better. Show me how the O-line got better after GDL took over responsibilities. Tell me which walk-ons they are going to coach up into the NFL.
Making **** up? Please. You're the one who was overjoyed at the fact Foley was taken off the OL and GDL was taking over. How did that work out for us this year? Let's see you defend that move without making **** up.
And when you fabricate inspirational stories about soldiers for the benefit of message board posters, you have no credibility to accuse others of making things up when they share their opinion.
"Pasqualoni and Deleone can't coach players up."
That's what you said, and that's what your entire thing I responded to was based on. It's a load of crap because it's pretty blatantly obvious that we've got more than a few players that have benefitted from the coachign they've gotten in the past two seasons, and some of them will play at the next level, that would not have been there otherwise, and if you've got some kind of foresight ability to know that a player coming out of high school, is capable of playing NFL football, I'd like to have your crystal ball.
Edsall's best recruiting class, was the class of 2007, the same year that Edsall started seriously looking for work elsewhere. Recruiting went downhill, now, with the benefit of hindsight, in a big way thereafter to the point by spring 2011, and Edsall leaving in the middle of the night, we were worse off than any of us outside, looking in, imagined.
If you don't agree with me, that's fine. We disagree.
You know what's a load of crap? Deleone taking over for Mike Foley on the OL. You can ignore that disastrous move because you thought it was great, but it was a fecunditying disaster.
They can't coach players up the way the prior regime did. That was the overall point of my post, and it was obvious.
Now you're suggesting there are players here that will be in the NFL but wouldn't were it not for the overwhelming impact of DeLeone and Pasqualoni?
Who??? Why?
I think your crystal ball needs a bit of polish, hypocrite.
I had made an assumption ... that I've since come to realize was quite far from reality.
Last time I started talking about the NFL and what players may or may not be able to play there, I got crucified too.
THe coaching staff we've got has it's faults, but the vast majority of the criticism coming from fans around here, is misguided. I feel partly at fault for that, because I was very vocal about certain things early in the season, because I had made an assumption prior to this season, that I've since come to realize was quite far from reality.
You're dancing. You called me out and kept at it, so back it up.
Which specific players on this team are destined for the NFL but would not be if it weren't for the impact of Deleone and Pasqualoni? Or save the crap about crystal balls.
You even brought up Reyes in this conversation. You're going to credit Pasqualoni and Deleone for Kendall Reyes, who they coached for one year as a redshirt senior?! Rather than Hughes and Edsall who had him for 4? Really? SMH
Carl, thousands who go to games either think we're crazy and don't post here or don't even know about this message board.Last time I started talking about the NFL and what players may or may not be able to play there, I got crucified too.
THe coaching staff we've got has it's faults, but the vast majority of the criticism coming from fans around here, is misguided. I feel partly at fault for that, because I was very vocal about certain things early in the season, because I had made an assumption prior to this season, that I've since come to realize was quite far from reality.
Carl, thousands who go to games either think we're crazy and don't post here or don't even know about this message board.
Take it easy dude, you're going wild with conclusions. Kendall Reyes, undoubtedly learned nuances of playing the game that have helped him to where he's at from the new coaching staff, in being able to be an immediate contributor in the NFL on the defensive line, and by my saying that, it does nothign to diminish what any other coach has done, is capable of, and continues to do.
Destined for the NFL? Nobody is destined for anything but death and taxes.
I will guarantee you this though, that any player coming out of UConn, that is given the opportunity to compete for a spot on an NFL roster, is going to impress their new coachign staff with their work ethic, their dedication and the simple abilty to pour everythign they've got onto the field, and that was something that Edsall established, and that Pasqualoni is continuing.
it's pretty blatantly obvious that we've got more than a few players that have benefitted from the coachign they've gotten in the past two seasons, and some of them will play at the next level, that would not have been there otherwise