- Joined
- Sep 14, 2013
- Messages
- 1,380
- Reaction Score
- 3,474
The CAA having a better-than-average year. Nice to see that. As a fan of the Stony Brook Seawolves is refreshing to see the CAA getting some wins against the P5
That was some 2nd half by Arizona.Zona smoking Alabama on the boards was predictable, Alabama seemed like they had zero interest in rebounding when they played Purdue
Agree.. how could anybody still feel the same hatred for cuse that they did 15 years ago? Might as well go get a Linkin Park tattoo while you're at it.They're not even relevant anymore. I don't think we should give them any exposure. We can play two OOC games a year in MSG, but a matchup vs Cuse would be boring
22-3 advantage on offensive rebounds. DReb was about even, 30-29.Zona smoking Alabama on the boards was predictable, Alabama seemed like they had zero interest in rebounding when they played Purdue
The team was ranked 18th before the tournament. When they played Michigan St., MSU was ranked 11th. I don't think it would've been some huge upset to take UConn there. Pretty evenly ranked.To be fair, that UConn team was one of the "worst" champions ever. It was totally reasonable to pick them to lose each game.
I thought Cuse was playing better this year.
Heck, UConn football nearly did this year.It's not that hard to go undefeated against the ACC
I'm just saying it didn't take an irrational anti-UConn bias to pick any of the opponents that year.The team was ranked 18th before the tournament. When they played Michigan St., MSU was ranked 11th. I don't think it would've been some huge upset to take UConn there. Pretty evenly ranked.
Then they played #1 Florida. They had already beaten Florida during the season, so it wasn't unthinkable.
Finally, they played a Kentucky team in the final. That team was unranked going into the tournament, so I'm not sure why you believe they should've been picked to lose each game when the competition in the final was inferior.
Not to mention the round of 64 game.
Also, can you imagine losing to Syracuse? That would be really embarrassing.They're not even relevant anymore. I don't think we should give them any exposure. We can play two OOC games a year in MSG, but a matchup vs Cuse would be boring
A good old-fashioned low-mid-major battle! The way the game should be played. ;-)I watched a little of both games. UMess looked good. Sound on both ends of the court. The Syracuse/Hofstra game was very evenly played, neither side seemed to have much advantage.
So you’re saying that Cuse and Hofstra are on the same level?? Those are beautiful words.I watched a little of both games. UMess looked good. Sound on both ends of the court. The Syracuse/Hofstra game was very evenly played, neither side seemed to have much advantage.
I'd like to think Dan's role would, but I doubt it. Today's College jobs have more stress than the Celtics job he left to get in the office for.I haven't seen this level of delusion in some time.
They are , last year they lose this game by 10I thought Cuse was playing better this year.
The interesting thing is. Will they continue to sacrifice basketball for football mediocrity. Or say f this and pay a good basketball coach 6 + million with Nil and go back in on basketball
I guess I'm in the minority, I take no pleasure in Syracuse being horrible. Many of their fans took great joy kicking dirt on UConn but so what? They have a serious inferiority complex when it comes to us because we blew past their program a long time ago and kept widening the gap but college basketball and northeast basketball is better when the Cuse is good and the Dome is rocking with 35,000 fans in there.
So you don't want a good Providence, St. John's, or Seton Hall either?Things are better for UConn when we're the only team in both the Tri State and New England.