cockhrnleghrn
Crowing rooster
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
- Messages
- 4,550
- Reaction Score
- 8,711
The point is in front of a national tv audience he is all but saying bottom-tier ACC teams with no hope of being near the top for a long top is better than anything else in our conference. It's a dumb comment being spread out nationally. Was his comment dumb? I say it is. Pitt and Cuse have been nothing. Mentioning them as relevant as if they would be better than USF is slap in the face to USF and what the other teams are trying to do in our conference. They are competing against the "mediocre Pitt's." When you have a national commentators making dumb comments it needs to be called out. We need our conference to get better. Ignorant comments like what he said doesn't help our conference. These are the type of comments why mid-major teams get so little respect from the NCAA. Maybe USF should have been a higher seed. I doubt that commentator has nay clue about any of that stuff.
I think Syracuse finished 4th in the ACC this year, with an 11-5 conference record. That is hardly terrible. Pitt won their first round NCAAT game against UTC, who beat both Tennessee and Stanford during the regular season, so they're not exactly chopped liver, either. There isn't tremendous depth of talent in WBB. Why is that? There are probably almost as many girls playing sports in high school as guys, but most likely the best coaches are not coaching girls sports in junior high, high school and even college, so the issue is probably one of quality coaching depth as much as anything.
