- Joined
- Aug 2, 2016
- Messages
- 4,617
- Reaction Score
- 59,058
He's here in Storrs today through Wednesday.Anyone have an account?
I don’t know much about his game either, but if Danny wants him, then so do I.Adams is the guy out of the 6 recruits we're really after that I have no feel for. No idea how he plays or if I want him, which is a strange thing to say about a 5* recruit
I also don't understand his ranking. He's incredibly skinny and not an explosive athlete so I assumed he must be an incredible shooter.If Adams & Mullins are mutually exclusive and the staff feels they can land Mullins, I am more 'all in' on Mullins. Adam's Peach Jam performance was so abysmal statistically and visually watching him, that I have a hard time understanding his rankings. We are recruiting him as a shooter I assume, and he was 5-28 from 3 = an awful 17.9%. Any good shooter can go into a cold streak, but he was 11-24 from the foul line = only 45.8%. Those stats together really dampen my enthusiasm as a 5* impact player to trust when the lights go on in the biggest games. Add to that, he only got 16 rebounds in 138 minutes which was real unimpressive in comparison to all the other taller guards we were watching. (Burries got 60 RB 41.7% from 3, 76.9% FT), (Thomas 28 RB, 35.7% from 3, and 76.5% FT in 146min) Mullins rose to the occasion in his bigger games. I'm sure Adams has had great outings to be ranked as high as he is, and maybe he was playing through some type of injury, but ...
He shot 41% from 3 in EYBL play this year so I think he is a shooter. Not quite on Mullins level as a shooter but definitely seems like it's a strength for him, despite the Peach Jam strugglesI also don't understand his ranking. He's incredibly skinny and not an explosive athlete so I assumed he must be an incredible shooter.
He looks to have a nice feel for the game but his ranking seems strange.
He shot 41% from 3 in EYBL play this year so I think he is a shooter. Not quite on Mullins level as a shooter but definitely seems like it's a strength for him, despite the Peach Jam struggles
I don't understand what's up with his free throw shooting lol. In every sample of stats I can find he's like 50-60% from the line.These are his stats from the HS season as well. Not the whole season but 12 games in that EYBL Scholastic league. So playing teams like Montverde, Paul VI, Oak Hill, Wasatch, etc.
15.1 PPG
5.1 RPG
1.5 APG
1.3 STL
0.7 BLK
46% 2FG (6.5 attempts)
41% 3FG (6.2 attempts)
56% FT (2.9 attempts)
Yeah, so the kid can definitely shoot. I have only watched one of his games, but what I see as the possible barriers to us prioritizing his recruitment is 1) size, 2) athleticism.
we'd need instant contribution from a frosh at PF if stew goes pro but that's where bundalo comes in. otherwise if we land lewis/adams/bundalo then we are 2 deep at every position. ball would be in line to be our starting 3rd guard like he was last year when castle was out:Reality is that we should be pretty good at the 1-2 next year with Amad, Solo and Aidan as a 3 man rotation. The only spot where I can see the need for an instant contributor as a frosh is in Liam’s wake at the 3.
I don't understand what's up with his free throw shooting lol. In every sample of stats I can find he's like 50-60% from the line.
we'd need instant contribution from a frosh at PF if stew goes pro but that's where bundalo comes in. otherwise if we land lewis/adams/bundalo then we are 2 deep at every position. ball would be in line to be our starting 3rd guard like he was last year when castle was out:
Nowell / Lewis
Mahaney / Adams
Ball / Ross
Bundalo / Abraham
Reed / Singare
my new wants in order are:
1) bundalo
2) lewis
3) adams
Gotta be mental
fair but it would def be a challenge to convince a starting worthy PF to commit after a 5* like bundalo. not to mention it would probably piss off bundalo as well.The rest of the post is fine, but in the portal era "we'd need an instant contribution from a frosh" is not a thing.
Recruit "your" recruits, and fill gaps around that skill/fit wise in portal.
It's cause he's really a 4 star talent, nothing wrong with that, but nothing here screams can't miss ability.I’m with @navery12 it’s the weirdest 5* recruitment ever - especially a high ranked 2. I can’t tell if I really like him or not, if it’s just a feel or based on real things…just weird.
But he’s obviously a good player. Danny wouldn’t be this deep into it if he didn’t fit everything we want, but he’s the strangest 5* case I’ve followed.