So if this constitutes "overachieving" by Dallas, I suppose Washington are the "underachievers"? Did these vaunted projections take into account all the player absences and opt-outs? E.g., that the Mystics would be without Delle Donne, Charles, Cloud and Powers?Dallas was projected to be a lottery team and are the youngest team in the league.
Snagging the 8th playoff spot would actually constitute overachieving somewhat.
So if this constitutes "overachieving" by Dallas, I suppose Washington are the "underachievers"? Did these vaunted projections take into account all the player absences and opt-outs? E.g., that the Mystics would be without Delle Donne, Charles, Cloud and Powers?
But those absences have impacted different teams to varying degrees. I believe that Dallas had no players opt out, and Harrison and Jefferson are their currently injured players. Pretty safe to say that Washington's personnel losses this year are more severe.I know you hate Arike, Muffet, and ND in general for on court and off the court actions and antics ward UConn but half of the league has a losing record and the majority of the teams (including Dallas) have had either player absences, injuries, and opt-outs, so what's the point?
So if this constitutes "overachieving" by Dallas, I suppose Washington are the "underachievers"? Did these vaunted projections take into account all the player absences and opt-outs? E.g., that the Mystics would be without Delle Donne, Charles, Cloud and Powers?
What's their record again?
Yeah, their record went from 5-13 to 6-13. Note taken.Better than it was a few days ago. Beating 2 playoff teams seems at least a little bit noteworthy.