Dallas Wings vs Washington Mystics - 9/06/20 | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Dallas Wings vs Washington Mystics - 9/06/20

Dillon77

WBB Enthusiast; ND Alum, Fan
Joined
Nov 6, 2015
Messages
6,404
Reaction Score
23,242
101-94 DAL final in OT

Mabrey was big down the stretch too.

Good win for Dallas.
- Nice start for KLS. Would like to see here be able to "get in the flow" and just let it go.
- Speaking of flow, when Arike gets into the combo pull-ups and blow-bys, it's tough.
- I agree. Marike hit the on button last quarter/OT.
- Sabally should be playing further out, but with the injuries, she's doing what's needed. Tough kid.
 

TheFarmFan

Stanford Fan, Huskies Admirer
Joined
Nov 28, 2018
Messages
2,106
Reaction Score
14,945
- Sabally should be playing further out, but with the injuries, she's doing what's needed. Tough kid.
Eventually, yes. So far she's shot 18% from outside as a pro (waaaaay below her shooting percentage at Oregon), so I'd say keeping her in the paint is the numbers move when you have so many sharpshooters in KLS, Arike, and Mabrey. Once she gets her 3 shot back I'd move her to play a stretch 4 because she really can do it all.
 

MilfordHusky

Voice of Reason
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
37,494
Reaction Score
128,225
Big game for Arike. She's trying to pin down the scoring title and get Dallas into the playoffs.
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,624
Reaction Score
71,108
Dallas was projected to be a lottery team and are the youngest team in the league.

Snagging the 8th playoff spot would actually constitute overachieving somewhat.
So if this constitutes "overachieving" by Dallas, I suppose Washington are the "underachievers"? Did these vaunted projections take into account all the player absences and opt-outs? E.g., that the Mystics would be without Delle Donne, Charles, Cloud and Powers?
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
680
Reaction Score
1,196
So if this constitutes "overachieving" by Dallas, I suppose Washington are the "underachievers"? Did these vaunted projections take into account all the player absences and opt-outs? E.g., that the Mystics would be without Delle Donne, Charles, Cloud and Powers?

I know you hate Arike, Muffet, and ND in general for on court and off the court actions and antics ward UConn but half of the league has a losing record and the majority of the teams (including Dallas) have had either player absences, injuries, and opt-outs, so what's the point?
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,624
Reaction Score
71,108
I know you hate Arike, Muffet, and ND in general for on court and off the court actions and antics ward UConn but half of the league has a losing record and the majority of the teams (including Dallas) have had either player absences, injuries, and opt-outs, so what's the point?
But those absences have impacted different teams to varying degrees. I believe that Dallas had no players opt out, and Harrison and Jefferson are their currently injured players. Pretty safe to say that Washington's personnel losses this year are more severe.

I started by commending Arike for her great shot.
 

Orangutan

South Bend Simian
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
5,878
Reaction Score
26,753
So if this constitutes "overachieving" by Dallas, I suppose Washington are the "underachievers"? Did these vaunted projections take into account all the player absences and opt-outs? E.g., that the Mystics would be without Delle Donne, Charles, Cloud and Powers?

They did take into account the opt-outs. Obviously not the mid-season Powers injury.

But Dallas also lost their original starting point guard in Jefferson.
 

UConnCat

Wise Woman
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
13,965
Reaction Score
87,738
In a normal season without opt-outs the Wings probably finish 9th or 10th which would be expected given their youth.

It's tough to gauge whether the Wings have actually improved. They're scoring more points (largely from taking and making more 3s) but have given up more points. Scoring overall looks to be up in the league this season. They should end up with a slightly better win % this season over last season (36% vs 29%), but with a much smaller % of their wins against playoff teams. Last season 7 of the Wings 10 wins were against playoff teams while so far this season only 1 of their 7 wins is against a team above them in the standings. They've won just enough games against the bottom 1/3 of the league.

All that said, the Wings are a dangerous single elimination team because of Arike's ability to make a lot of the many shots she's going to take.
 
Last edited:

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,624
Reaction Score
71,108
What a minute, maybe Washington is a little better than @Plebe was giving them credit for? Just took down Minnesota.
What's their record again?
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,624
Reaction Score
71,108
Better than it was a few days ago. Beating 2 playoff teams seems at least a little bit noteworthy.
Yeah, their record went from 5-13 to 6-13. Note taken.

note taken.gif
 

Online statistics

Members online
329
Guests online
2,176
Total visitors
2,505

Forum statistics

Threads
160,723
Messages
4,235,734
Members
10,093
Latest member
Verna


.
Top Bottom