Daily Campus article - why UConn should go to MAC | Page 7 | The Boneyard

Daily Campus article - why UConn should go to MAC

Because I’ve already given you more time than you deserve.

It’s funny that you think such a bad deal is a slam dunk though.
So you couldn't name even one thing that I said which you think was not accurate.

Glad we got that straight.


I get the feeling you struggle to have conversations with people who have different opinions than yours.

Only one of us is making points and backing it up with data.

UConn only makes 6-7 million on TV in the current setup. I don't see how that's sustainable for UConn long term.
 
So you couldn't name even one thing that I said which you think was not accurate.

Glad we got that straight.


I get the feeling you struggle to have conversations with people who have different opinions than yours.

Only one of us is making points and backing it up with data.

UConn only makes 6-7 million on TV in the current setup. I don't see how that's sustainable for UConn long term.

Again. We just won a national championship and are ranked in the top 10 now. Seems pretty sustainable to me. The program is flying higher than ever.

I don’t see an offer on the table. I don’t see how an offer could be made to make the move worth it.

You’re not worth having a discussion with because your stance is simply “here is a bad deal, it’s not in your best interest to take it but you should anyways.”
 
I am not arguing. Zoo seems to be the only one arguing here.

Sounds like UConn gets 5-6 million from the Big East and around 600k for FB under the current contract So 6-7 million total. that's not sustainable.
But you think UConn would need 15-20 million to join the B12 in BB? That seems pretty agressive but it might work. That would cover travel and add around 8-10 million extra to the AD.

TV is not the only source of revenue from the Big East. We also get NCAA tournament credits.
 

2023 College Basketball Budget​



Latest
Budget
Numbers
1University of KentuckySEC$17,646,655
2The University of Texas at AustinBig 12$17,483,966
3Duke UniversityACC$14,492,257
4University of KansasBig 12$14,079,953
5University of ArizonaPac 12$13,261,874
6University of LouisvilleACC$12,321,810
7Villanova UniversityBig East$12,019,905
8Wichita State UniversityAmerican$11,778,856
9Marquette UniversityBig East$11,457,181
10Texas Christian UniversityBig 12$11,046,799
11University of Oklahoma-Norman CampusBig 12$10,855,754
12Baylor UniversityBig 12$10,599,030
13Vanderbilt UniversitySEC$10,399,670
14University of Virginia-Main CampusACC$10,259,903
15University of Nebraska-LincolnBig Ten$10,183,146
16Indiana University-BloomingtonBig Ten$10,161,350
17Syracuse UniversityACC$10,064,914
18Texas A & M University-College StationSEC$10,033,638
19Auburn UniversitySEC$9,917,360
20Georgetown UniversityBig East$9,694,010
21The University of Tennessee-KnoxvilleSEC$9,674,480
22Ohio State University-Main CampusBig Ten$9,481,027
23Gonzaga UniversityWCC$9,105,908
24University of California-Los AngelesPac 12$9,072,651
25University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignBig Ten$8,983,663
26Texas Tech UniversityBig 12$8,887,157
27Providence CollegeBig East$8,875,013
28Michigan State UniversityBig Ten$8,563,483
29University of OregonPac 12$8,528,186
30University of UtahPac 12$8,475,318
31The University of AlabamaSEC$8,387,815
32University of ArkansasSEC$8,201,219
33University of MississippiSEC$8,132,066
34University of North Carolina at Chapel HillACC$8,116,597
35University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh CampusACC$7,960,631
36Rutgers University-New BrunswickBig Ten$7,925,210
37Boston CollegeACC$7,739,270
38University of Maryland-College ParkBig Ten$7,727,539
39University of Washington-Seattle CampusPac 12$7,669,792
40University of MiamiACC$7,643,768
41The Pennsylvania State UniversityBig Ten$7,583,437
42University of ConnecticutBig East$7,582,613
43North Carolina State University at RaleighACC$7,579,872
44Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical CollegeSEC$7,577,483
45Northwestern UniversityBig Ten$7,527,703
46West Virginia UniversityBig 12$7,499,341
47University of HoustonAmerican$7,460,535
48University of Missouri-ColumbiaSEC$7,321,237
49University of Michigan-Ann ArborBig Ten$7,178,782
50University of Southern CaliforniaPac 12$7,174,744
51University of GeorgiaSEC$7,130,192
52Creighton UniversityBig East$7,066,546
53Xavier UniversityBig East$6,984,664
54University of IowaBig Ten$6,874,147
55St. John’s University-New YorkBig East$6,808,098
56University of Notre DameACC$6,770,465
57Florida State UniversityACC$6,727,136
58Stanford UniversityPac 12$6,660,155
59University of South Carolina-ColumbiaSEC$6,612,640
60Purdue University-Main CampusBig Ten$6,605,655
61University of FloridaSEC$6,524,621
62Kansas State UniversityBig 12$6,524,007
63Arizona State University Campus ImmersionPac 12$6,505,245
64University of MemphisAmerican$6,486,993
65Seton Hall UniversityBig East$6,431,722
66Southern Methodist UniversityAmerican$6,421,688
67University of Minnesota-Twin CitiesBig Ten$6,296,158
68Clemson UniversityACC$6,274,665
69Mississippi State UniversitySEC$6,260,208
70University of Wisconsin-MadisonBig Ten$6,200,287
71Iowa State UniversityBig 12$6,125,139
72University of DaytonAtlantic 10$5,976,600
73University of California-BerkeleyPac 12$5,912,459
74Virginia Commonwealth UniversityAtlantic 10$5,883,023
75Saint Louis UniversityAtlantic 10$5,791,811
76Wake Forest UniversityACC$5,783,444
77Georgia Institute of Technology-Main CampusACC$5,774,159
78Brigham Young UniversityWCC$5,642,195
79Washington State UniversityPac 12$5,630,389
80DePaul UniversityBig East$5,559,830

Pretty much the entire conference is in the Top 80.

Looks fine to me.
 
I am not arguing. Zoo seems to be the only one arguing here.

Sounds like UConn gets 5-6 million from the Big East and around 600k for FB under the current contract So 6-7 million total. that's not sustainable.
But you think UConn would need 15-20 million to join the B12 in BB? That seems pretty agressive but it might work. That would cover travel and add around 8-10 million extra to the AD.

The Big 12 would be nuts to pay us 15-20M for basketball only. It would be nuts to pay any program that much.

That’s why it’s silly to even entertain such a proposal. If you’re paying that much for basketball you might as well take football too.

Why would you pay UConn $20M when it’s not even getting a quarter of that currently for TV.
 
How did the Big 12’s best do in basketball yesterday? Didn’t they play a Big East school?
 
.-.
So you couldn't name even one thing that I said which you think was not accurate.

Glad we got that straight.


I get the feeling you struggle to have conversations with people who have different opinions than yours.

Only one of us is making points and backing it up with data.

UConn only makes 6-7 million on TV in the current setup. I don't see how that's sustainable for UConn long term.
I think a lot of what you've said makes sense, honestly. But I also think there are a few big problems: most of the fan base will have too much pride to accept a basketball only deal, especially when we've been scheduling quality FB opponents, as some of our posters have mentioned; the dollars might be slightly better, but we've seen what happens when we join a far-flung league that lacks traditional rivals and prevents fans from traveling to opponents and to see conference tournaments. The attendance boost alone has allowed for raised ticket prices, and the brand is as strong as it's ever been since we returned to a league that excites our fan base.

It would also burden the rest of the athletic department with the same travel ridiculousness that is making the ACC consider playing half its schedule (including Olympic sports) without spectators, at neutral venues in the Dallas area.

Really hoping football breaks away sooner than later. I'd be happy with UConn FB existing in some murky gray area between FBS and FCS if the basketball program can still play in the tourney and go up against the P4.
 
I think a lot of what you've said makes sense, honestly. But I also think there are a few big problems: most of the fan base will have too much pride to accept a basketball only deal, especially when we've been scheduling quality FB opponents, as some of our posters have mentioned; the dollars might be slightly better, but we've seen what happens when we join a far-flung league that lacks traditional rivals and prevents fans from traveling to opponents and to see conference tournaments. The attendance boost alone has allowed for raised ticket prices, and the brand is as strong as it's ever been since we returned to a league that excites our fan base.

It would also burden the rest of the athletic department with the same travel ridiculousness that is making the ACC consider playing half its schedule (including Olympic sports) without spectators, at neutral venues in the Dallas area.

Really hoping football breaks away sooner than later. I'd be happy with UConn FB existing in some murky gray area between FBS and FCS if the basketball program can still play in the tourney and go up against the P4.

Big 12 football isn’t in some golden spot either.

There are like 20 teams wrist get meaningful tv ratings. And none of them will be in the Big 12.
 

Temple didn't draw in the Big East, the AAC, or anywhere. What's your point?

Please continue to ignore exactly what everyone has told you about the MAC. This article literally spells it out for you, but you respond with TEMPLE?
 
.-.
The Big 12 would be nuts to pay us 15-20M for basketball only. It would be nuts to pay any program that much.

That’s why it’s silly to even entertain such a proposal. If you’re paying that much for basketball you might as well take football too.

Why would you pay UConn $20M when it’s not even getting a quarter of that currently for TV.
If the Basketball Teams take over the Tourney .
Paying a traditional BB power like UConn or Villanova $20,000,000 will be a no brainer
You can pay for yourself with tourney contributions
 
If the Basketball Teams take over the Tourney .
Paying a traditional BB power like UConn or Villanova $20,000,000 will be a no brainer
You can pay for yourself with tourney contributions

But until that happens…
 
Temple didn't draw in the Big East, the AAC, or anywhere. What's your point?

Please continue to ignore exactly what everyone has told you about the MAC. This article literally spells it out for you, but you respond with TEMPLE?

Huh? Go eat a snickers.

Temple has been a better program for the last dozen years than UConn. And they have been bad this season.

I didn’t ignore what you said about the MAC. I just don’t think the arguments you offer are valid.

But keep on scheduling four automatic losses and wondering out loud why we still suck!
 
If the Basketball Teams take over the Tourney .
Paying a traditional BB power like UConn or Villanova $20,000,000 will be a no brainer
You can pay for yourself with tourney contributions
To pay $20M annually with Tourny contributions you need to average 4 units a year. That’s Elite 8 every year. You get upset in the first round just once and it's impossible to make it up without a final four trip and a championship in the next two seasons (just to get back to that 4 unit a season average).

For context, Kansas who hasn't missed a tournament since 1989, has only 14 Elite Eight appearances in that 33 season span. Averaging 4 units a season is an entirely unrealistic proposition in men's basketball. Until the valuation of basketball TV rights gets larger (unlikely) it’s extraordinarily unlikely that a basketball first add is approaching $10M let alone $20M, given the new paradigm of unequal or unpaid shares for new “junior” members of the club.
 
.-.
That’s a question for UMass. There is zero evidence that the UConn admin is actively pursuing this.
No, we are talking with the MAC, but need a partner. How much evidence was there before the new Big East move was announced?
 
Honestly it’s pretty pathetic at this point. 2 independent FBS teams left in the entire country and were one of them? Hell even Delaware found a home and they don’t even play FBS football yet!

It’s absurd that we thought it wasn’t possible to be good at basketball or football in the American. You can be good at sports in mediocre conferences - BYU, SDSU, UCF, Cinci, JMU, Houston all did it along with countless others. Now we’re stuck without a home for the one sport that drives college athletics. AD Dave, his predecessors, and this entire administration have single handedly screwed us thanks to a decade of absolutely atrocious decisions.

Anyone smart would be looking to find us a home for football so that we can eventually upgrade to a Power conference in the next round of realignment. Anything besides that is malpractice. MAC, Sun Belt, MWC i don’t care but find us a home and do it quick. And regionally is dead so it really doesn’t matter which one we go to.
 
Honestly it’s pretty pathetic at this point. 2 independent FBS teams left in the entire country and were one of them? Hell even Delaware found a home and they don’t even play FBS football yet!

It’s absurd that we thought it wasn’t possible to be good at basketball or football in the American. You can be good at sports in mediocre conferences - BYU, SDSU, UCF, Cinci, JMU, Houston all did it along with countless others. Now we’re stuck without a home for the one sport that drives college athletics. AD Dave, his predecessors, and this entire administration have single handedly screwed us thanks to a decade of absolutely atrocious decisions.

Anyone smart would be looking to find us a home for football so that we can eventually upgrade to a Power conference in the next round of realignment. Anything besides that is malpractice. MAC, Sun Belt, MWC i don’t care but find us a home and do it quick. And regionally is dead so it really doesn’t matter which one we go to.
My guy, it takes two to tango. I'm sure AD Dave would love for us to be in a conference for football only, but how many conferences do you see actively pursuing us?
 
Honestly it’s pretty pathetic at this point. 2 independent FBS teams left in the entire country and were one of them? Hell even Delaware found a home and they don’t even play FBS football yet!

It’s absurd that we thought it wasn’t possible to be good at basketball or football in the American. You can be good at sports in mediocre conferences - BYU, SDSU, UCF, Cinci, JMU, Houston all did it along with countless others. Now we’re stuck without a home for the one sport that drives college athletics. AD Dave, his predecessors, and this entire administration have single handedly screwed us thanks to a decade of absolutely atrocious decisions.

Anyone smart would be looking to find us a home for football so that we can eventually upgrade to a Power conference in the next round of realignment. Anything besides that is malpractice. MAC, Sun Belt, MWC i don’t care but find us a home and do it quick. And regionally is dead so it really doesn’t matter which one we go to.
So if we join the MAC we automatically get invited to a P-Star conference in the next burst of conference realignment? Is that how that works?
 
.-.
My guy, it takes two to tango. I'm sure AD Dave would love for us to be in a conference for football only, but how many conferences do you see actively pursuing us?
Actually, in the case of the Sun Belt, MAC, or CUSA, he would not.
 
My guy, it takes two to tango. I'm sure AD Dave would love for us to be in a conference for football only, but how many conferences do you see actively pursuing us?

Pretty CUSA would say “you had us at hello”.

They already tried it on with us once.
 
So if we join the MAC we automatically get invited to a P-Star conference in the next burst of conference realignment? Is that how that works?
No you’re right - we should stay an independent in football, go 3-9 every year, have 8k people in the stands, not bowl tie-ins, no schedule consistency, and no permanent home. Oh and then we can play 8 tiny catholic schools in basketball! That seems like the path towards long term athletic success and relevance.
 
No you’re right - we should stay an independent in football, go 3-9 every year, have 8k people in the stands, not bowl tie-ins, no schedule consistency, and no permanent home. Oh and then we can play 8 tiny catholic schools in basketball! That seems like the path towards long term athletic success and relevance.
You do know our schedule is set for at least the next 3 years or so? We can go 3-9 in the MAC in front of even less people than now. Also, not sure if youve noticed, but we won a national championship and are a top 5 team this year playing those 8 tiny Catholic schools.
 
No you’re right - we should stay an independent in football, go 3-9 every year, have 8k people in the stands, not bowl tie-ins, no schedule consistency, and no permanent home. Oh and then we can play 8 tiny catholic schools in basketball! That seems like the path towards long term athletic success and relevance.
So just curious, why is it important for you to identify the other Big East schools as Catholic schools? How does that advanced your argument? If you were just arguing against playing a small private schools, why not just say that?

In any event, you realize that posting imaginary records and imaginary attendance isn't actually an argument, right? It's just you playing make-believe, which is fine if that's what you're into, but it really isn't an intelligent or informed discussion of the issue.
 
Last edited:
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,359
Messages
4,567,528
Members
10,469
Latest member
xxBlueChips


Top Bottom