Creighton Scouting Report | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Creighton Scouting Report

None of these posts conform to haiku syllable counting.

Either score more points than Creighton does, or hold them to fewer points than the offense scores. I'm okay with either of these scenarios. And I don't bet.

Go Huskies.
 
Coach Mac knows he has a short bench. Needs his top 7 to be available. Guessing he's saying.. Let them get their points. We'll outscore them. We can't afford foul trouble.
48 points might outscore Virginia or Wisconsin, but not UConn. :)
 
Alright, time for the rematch, this time in Omaha where UConn has been winless since rejoining the Big East.

Creighton has been 6-2 since our last matchup, scoring a minimum of 78 points in every game after scoring just 48 in the first matchup.

Here are some changes to rankings, etc:
  • 11th in KenPom (up from 15)
  • 19th in offensive efficiency (up from 23)
  • 24th in defensive efficiency (down from 15)
Screen Shot 2024-02-18 at 12.21.05 PM.jpg


Again, Creighton is very good, but super top heavy as Greg McDermott basically has a six-man rotation with Kalkbrenner playing 38+ minutes in each of the last five games and Farabello playing basically starter's minutes off the bench playing both the 1 and 2.

Screen Shot 2024-02-18 at 12.25.29 PM.jpg


That chart above, to me, is simply absurd. Two lineups make up nearly 80% of all minutes played.

That being said, we didn't have Clingan in the starting lineup last matchup, so it wouldn't surprise me if Kalkbrenner would need a little more rest facing a healthy Clingan.
 
Alright, time for the rematch, this time in Omaha where UConn has been winless since rejoining the Big East.

Creighton has been 6-2 since our last matchup, scoring a minimum of 78 points in every game after scoring just 48 in the first matchup.

Here are some changes to rankings, etc:
  • 11th in KenPom (up from 15)
  • 19th in offensive efficiency (up from 23)
  • 24th in defensive efficiency (down from 15)
View attachment 96613

Again, Creighton is very good, but super top heavy as Greg McDermott basically has a six-man rotation with Kalkbrenner playing 38+ minutes in each of the last five games and Farabello playing basically starter's minutes off the bench playing both the 1 and 2.

View attachment 96615

That chart above, to me, is simply absurd. Two lineups make up nearly 80% of all minutes played.

That being said, we didn't have Clingan in the starting lineup last matchup, so it wouldn't surprise me if Kalkbrenner would need a little more rest facing a healthy Clingan.
I like how we match up with them this year. We have two players in Castle and AK who can cover their best scorer Scheierman. Last game they started Miller so Castle covered Baylor to start. Our defensive intensity was really starting to show in that game. But their house is one of the most difficult places to win in the country.
 
Wow, started reading without looking at the dates and was very confused. Didn't realize same scouting report used for both games!!

Call if a trap game or whatever you want, this one is going to be a bear. How can we not flatten a little bit from Marquette? That being said, Karaban and Castle coming into game with an axe to grind. 12 point win, but a hard fought close game!!

And as always, DOOMED!
 
.-.
Alright, time for the rematch, this time in Omaha where UConn has been winless since rejoining the Big East.

Creighton has been 6-2 since our last matchup, scoring a minimum of 78 points in every game after scoring just 48 in the first matchup.

Here are some changes to rankings, etc:
  • 11th in KenPom (up from 15)
  • 19th in offensive efficiency (up from 23)
  • 24th in defensive efficiency (down from 15)
View attachment 96613

Again, Creighton is very good, but super top heavy as Greg McDermott basically has a six-man rotation with Kalkbrenner playing 38+ minutes in each of the last five games and Farabello playing basically starter's minutes off the bench playing both the 1 and 2.

View attachment 96615

That chart above, to me, is simply absurd. Two lineups make up nearly 80% of all minutes played.

That being said, we didn't have Clingan in the starting lineup last matchup, so it wouldn't surprise me if Kalkbrenner would need a little more rest facing a healthy Clingan.
Whatever happened to Fred King? That kid showed a lot of promise spelling Kalk last year but he seems to be getting less run this season.
 
This is not a trap game. This is a game against what will be a top 15 team, on the road where they are 11-2 this year. This will be a very difficult game

Keep Clingan on the floor, make your threes, and we should win. Trey and Scheierman shot 7-23 last time and 2-10 on threes. That won’t happen again, have to stay glued to them all game
 
This is not a trap game. This is a game against what will be a top 15 team, on the road where they are 11-2 this year. This will be a very difficult game

Keep Clingan on the floor, make your threes, and we should win. Trey and Scheierman shot 7-23 last time and 2-10 on threes. That won’t happen again, have to stay glued to them all game
It might.

We don’t allow threes.

What makes us elite is with Clingan we don’t allow layups either

Teams having bad shooting nights against us is not by accident
 
After the Marquette beatdown, Creighton has trap game written all over it. I hope our guys stay focused.

A road game against a ranked team with a weaker team at home on the other side does not meet any conventional definition of "trap game." What it is is a very quick turnaround to travel to a gym that will be loud for a team that's very good and has given us issues in the past and just smoked Butler on their court.

In my opinion, it would be the most impressive thing this team has done this year if they fly out to Omaha two days after playing Marquette and get a win.
 
.-.
This is not a trap game. This is a game against what will be a top 15 team, on the road where they are 11-2 this year. This will be a very difficult game

Keep Clingan on the floor, make your threes, and we should win. Trey and Scheierman shot 7-23 last time and 2-10 on threes. That won’t happen again, have to stay glued to them all game
DC needs to just play with his hands up and not worry about how many shots he blocks but instead worry about how many he changes just by staying in the lineup. He did that yesterday and we were better for that reason.
Kalk made 3 threes yesterday let’s see if he does that again!

Another fun game which to me is house money.
 
DC needs to just play with his hands up and not worry about how many shots he blocks but instead worry about how many he changes just by staying in the lineup. He did that yesterday and we were better for that reason.
Kalk made 3 threes yesterday let’s see if he does that again!

Another fun game which to me is house money.
Our position now has definitely changed the stress level of these last two big road games. But it’s tough not to get greedy.
 
Creighton (13-4)
#15 in KenPom
35h in minutes continuity (62.6%)

23rd in Offensive efficiency
  • 3rd w/ a 61.4 2P%
  • 7th in 3PA/FGA (48.8%); 71th w/ a 36 3P%
  • 47th in A/FGM (57.4%)
  • 52nd w/ a 75.4 FT%, but just 331st in FTA/FGM
  • 96th in turnover prevention
  • 181st in offensive tempo
  • 192nd in offensive rebounding rate

15th in Defensive efficiency
  • 1st in FTA/FGM prevention
  • 4th in 3PA/FGA prevention (27%); 39th in opp. 3P% (30.2%)
  • 5th in A/FGM prevention (37.9%)
  • 12th in defensive rebounding rate
  • 25th in opp. 2P% (44.6%)
  • Opponents spend 17.8 seconds/possession (283rd in tempo)
  • 362nd in turnovers caused rate

Results from first Big East games
  • OTL to Villanova 66-68
  • 67-72 L to Marquette
  • Four straight wins against Georgetown, Providence, DePaul and St. John’s
  • Non-conference losses to Colorado State
  • Non-conference wins to Iowa, Nebraska, Oklahoma State and Alabama
  • Non-conference schedule ranked 66th hardest
View attachment 95177

PROJECTED STARTING LINEUP:

Steven Ashworth 6’1 170 senior transfer from Utah State

Trey Alexander 6’4 190 junior
  • 209th in usage rate
  • Team’s third highest rated defender

Baylor Scheierman 6’7 205 fifth-year returnee
  • 237th in usage rate; 395th in national offensive efficiency
  • Teams second highest rated defender

Mason Miller 6’9 190 sophomore
  • 6th nationally in offensive efficiency

Ryan Kalbrenner 7’1 270 senior
  • 71st nationally in offensive efficiency
  • Team’s highest rated defender
View attachment 95176
FREQUENTLY USED BENCH PIECES - 22.0% minutes (345th in nation)
  • Since the start of Big East play, Farabello is the only bench piece who has played 6+ minutes in consecutive conference games.
Francisco Farabello 6’3 180 fifth-year returnee
  • 426th nationally in offensive efficiency

UConn’s first half-dozen Big East opponents entered this season facing major roster facelifts while Creighton is one of the few teams in the conference with most of its key roster returning.

The biggest change has been Ryan Nembhard transferring to Gonzaga and Utah State senior Steven Ashworth taking his place in the starting lineup. After a 21.6% usage rate at Utah State, Ashworth’s rate has dipped to 16.9% at Creighton, who, along with Arthur Kaluma replacement Mason Miller, performs most of his scoring from the perimeter while opening up space for Kalkbrenner and Trey Alexander to generate most of their offensive from the inside.

Ashworth is still the team’s point guard, but, like UConn, the team shares the ball very well with Scheierman and Alexander actually posting higher assist rates than Ashworth. Simply put, Mason Miller is an elite spacer with size, but an ultra-low usage guy, so much of Creighton’s offense is based on a three-man game between Alexander/Kalkbrenner/Scheierman.

Speaking of their usage rate, the trio all played 38+ minutes in their last game against St. John’s, which features six players playing 22+ minutes, one with six (redshirt freshman forward Isaac Traudt) and two other forwards playing one minute. Like last year, elite spacer Francisco Farabello returns in his role off the bench and is playing even more this year. Considering his low usage rate, he and Ashworth almost never share the floor together, but when they do, Creighton basically turns their offensive strategy into a two-man game with Kalkbrenner and Alexander along with three spacers: Farabello, Ashworth and Miler.

A downside of Kaluma and Nembhard transferring out: more of their scoring emphasis is on Kalkbrenner/Scheierman/Alexander – they are responsible for 62.8% of the team’s scoring while last year, the trio scored 55.4% of the team’s total.

The good news: they’re even better this year. Kalkbrenner is still an elite two-way center, but he’s even more willing to let it rip from three (17% of FGAs are from three, compared to 6% last year). Alexander is still an excellent offensive creator, but he’s increased his efficiency inside the arc and is now truly an all-around guard thanks to his increased assist rate (23.8% compared to 15.1% last year. Scheierman is still one of the most underheralded excellent wings in the nation – he’s a tough, savvy two-way star who has managed to so far increase his usage rate and his efficiency ratings. He’s even been able to foul even less despite his aggressive style of play.

In terms of matchup, obviously the biggest concern is Kalkbrenner. He rarely sits and this is the smallest squad we’ve played against Creighton with Kalkbrenner in the lineup. There are some parallels between Kalkbrenner and Soriano and UConn was able to hold Soriano to just 14 points back in December. However, Soriano is not surrounded with teammates as talented as Alexander and Scheierman and also, he doesn’t play in a system that spaces as well as Creighton. I have trouble picturing UConn defending him effectively without fouling a lot. Singare’s got five fouls to give, right?

In terms of stylistic matchups, there are plenty of intriguing mixes to explore: UConn moves the ball beautifully, but Creighton is elite at defending assist opportunities. Creighton is also the best team in the nation at preventing free throw opportunities, so it’ll be tough for Newton and Castle to break down the defense and get to the bucket. Creighton shoots a ton of threes, and UConn does a nice job preventing perimeter opportunities. UConn is an elite offensive rebounding team; Creighton is an elite defensive rebounding team. Creighton is also excellent at defending the perimeter, but Miller is one of their weakest defenders, so it’ll be interesting to see how Karaban plays against him when he’s at the power forward spot.

I’m not going to lie, with Clingan still out, this is easily the toughest matchup UConn has faced since the Kansas game. However, if Clingan can play…verrrrrry different story.
You are missing loss to unlv. Creighton is pretty much responsible for making mountain west a 5-6 bid league
 
It’s a conference road game against a really good team, so it’ll be tough, but I still feel really good about this matchup. Castle really got to Scheierman last time and I’d expect we see no change in the game plan there. And we’re still an elite PnR defense, which really takes a bite out of Kalk’s value on the offensive end. We’re just an awful matchup for this Creighton squad.
 
I don't think the guys are afraid of any road games at this point. I think they've tasted their own blood and are just getting to the point where they are playing with their prey before devouring it. Let's have a meal in Omaha
 
.-.
Creighton has only played five teams with a top 35 Kenpom defense.

#33 (n) Colorado State (0-1). 69-48
#18 (home win) PC (1-1). 69-60 win, (78-78 regulation) 91-87 OT loss - both teams had a 45+ second half.
#17 @Marquette (0-1) 72-67
#19 Nova (0-1). 68-66
#11 @ UConn (0-1). 62-48

Of note, PC (127) is by far the worst offense by Kenpom of those five teams, followed by Nova (66).

Yes, I know this basically says Creighton loses to good teams but they did beat Alabama, Iowa and Nebraska. Who are very good to decent teams.

They have only two wins where they have scored fewer than 70 points (PC and SJU). Three of their last five come against Marquette, UConn and @Nova. It will be interesting to see if they can win those games because they haven't shown the ability to yet. Even in the one win (PC) they only put up 69 points.
 
After the Marquette beatdown, Creighton has trap game written all over it. I hope our guys stay focused.
We call this specific type a "let-down game" crossed with a "game of their season". Short rest window traveling to the Midwest midweek and changing time zones to play a good team with a great crowd. Now, it seems like Hurley so far has done a good job avoiding these pitfall games (other than SHU) and has talked about it endlessly. We're not going to be overlooking them like a typical trap game, but we'll see what kind of energy the team has after that emotional win.

But whatever the spread ends up being (guessing opens -2 and bet up to -3.5), I'll probably take the points.
 
When was the last top 25 road win that we had? Could this be the first in the Hurley era if we win?
 
.-.
Not sure a conference road game against a soon-to-be a top 15 team where UConn hasn't won since rejoining the Big East is a trap game.
It will be a tough test.
My intuitive nature says that we may be subconciously fighting a letdown after the tremendous Winn over Marquette. This at least in the first part of the first half( once counted as quarters). Practically speaking for us to win out the regular season, take the whole thing in MSG, and the championship game is a lot to ask for.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,306
Messages
4,562,413
Members
10,458
Latest member
caw2


Top Bottom