- Joined
- Dec 14, 2015
- Messages
- 10,161
- Reaction Score
- 67,620
You’re not breaking anything to me. You’re just wrong. Go take a look at the top 10 scoring list. WHEN AK gets there try justify not calling him one of our greatest players.So you’re talking cumulative stats, and wanting to reward him for longevity. Kicker there is most great players leave before 4 years so it’s not all that fair. Steph was so much more fun to watch, will represent UConn in the NBA and helped win us a title.
What would AK be if he left after 2024 like he likely should have?
I kind of think of great as having key impact to titles, or immense talent you wanted to watch.
He’s not an all time great, sorry to break it to you.
Idc who was more “fun” to watch. AK objectively had a better UConn career than most guys. Yes when judging greatness of UConn players longevity goes into it. That matters. He stayed here. He won. A lot.
It’s gone make yall sick when they put him on that wall.