- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,162
- Reaction Score
- 27,182
I guess, the question is why? Is it because it hurts our feelings? Is it because we want to change the public narrative? I don't know that we can address every idiot poster on every big 12 board. I do think that there is some utility in commenting to the bigger players. I see zero utility in calling people "hayseeds" or questioning their sophistication or refinement. I think that is the worst of UConn Twitter.
On the other hand, if someone with a smattering a Ave following says that Connecticut will need to upgrade their facilities, posting a link to our facilities might have some value.
Most of the stuff is just noise from idiots. It's not worth trying to address. There's zero point in being drawn into a mudslinging contest.
JMO
Maybe the tweet about the Social Content position will address some of it.
IMO you want to get in front of the false propaganda, otherwise it becomes entrenched and people see it fact. I think this has already happened and it can hurt our chances.
