Yes and no. For kids? We have wiped out kids with this approach. They weren't at risk and now they anxiety and depression among young people is at crazy levels. Would probably have been better to let them all get the disease and then go about their lives normally.
My own experience with people suffering from Alzheimer's has been that we effectively killed them via isolation. Isolation is more deadly to them than the disease. I also believe that the measures we took benefitted those who can work from home (like me) at the expense of those who can't. The essential workers out there bore the brunt of this. Was GBD the right answer? I don't know. I am 100% that what we did wasn't the right answer either.
The ramifications of shutting down the economy of, basically, the entire world for a year was never really considered or not enough.
The psychological impact of lockdowns and restrictions that are eased and tightened ad nausea still hasn't been adequately addressed.
Social isolation is hard on most people. What should have happened was doctors meeting with psychologists, economists, and sociologists to flesh out a multifaceted plan to navigate Covid that considers local and national economies as well as people's mental well-being. Right now we are one year into the new ABnormal and people's personal well-being has taken a back seat.
Experts, like doctors, are extremely useful to form policy but they NOT infallible, otherwise there wouldn't be such a large group of respected experts joining the GBD. More experts from more fields (and even average people) should have been consulted to come up with better ideas and plans on how to navigate these weird, strange times that take into account, not just health but mental, social, emotional components as well as local and global economics.