You all are a tough crowd. AD David Benedict's statement was a respectful way of saying no. Consider:
- This was an unsolicited phone call from the CUSA to UConn
- AD David Benedict only acknowledged that the phone call occurred
- AD David Benedict disagreed with the characterization that there were any "negotiations"
- CUSA approaching UConn is not them approaching a B1G AD who would laugh them off the phone and have the authorization from their school to give a unilateral no over the phone
- CUSA is desperate for any positive press
Here's what almost surely happened:
- CUSA commissioner cold-called, AD David Benedict took the phone call.
- There were some theoretical and peripheral discussions about UConn's potential interest joining as football only.
- AD David Benedict, not being in a position to unilaterally turn down an advance from the CUSA over the phone on a cold call, agreed to think about it and talk to some folks. Perhaps there was an acknowledgement of speaking again soon.
- After the phone call, AD David Benedict does not consider it a realistic option and tables it for now. CUSA runs to The Athletic and claims they're in "negotiations" with us in an attempt to get a positive headline.
- AD David Benedict contacts Mike Anthony and, again not in a position to unilaterally turn down an invite and to maintain a positive public image, tells CUSA "thanks but no thanks" in a respectful manner. This is likely the reason for the "exploratory" language and the line about "if we were going to think about this, we'd want to know a lot more." His statement is not posturing for future negotiations. He was clearly distancing the school from this article, this story, and this conference.
He clearly and convincingly said this ain't a thing.