committee top 16

[Bald Husky]

WHAT is your question? Is there one?

You really don't have to play a conference tournament game for it to count?

 

[browns]

Oh really? Let's see how they actually fare against SC first given their Top 25 wins are really wins against 13-25 teams and 2 of them are way out of top 25 contention-MSU and Texas. Look at their other wins, all are by paltry scores. I am not sold on this team even as a #2 seed as I think Baylor is better, UCLA, Arizona and probably Oregon and Maryland. The whole 7-0 vs. Top 25 without a top 10 team in the bunch is not a great discussion. I would be very comfortable having them in our side of the bracket.

I've only seen the Pac 12 teams a couple of times but hav watched L'ville ,NC state and A&M numerous times and just by the eye test see A&M as a final 4 team ahead of the ACC teams but your right let's see how they do against SC the last day of the regular season

 

[Bald Husky]

Because the PAC-12 is a tough conference where each team has played a tougher schedule than say...UConn.

How do we judge how good they really are if they don't play UCONN, Baylor,SC, NC State, ETC. I guess we'll find out in the tournament.

 

[Bald Husky]

Yep, Kim Barnes Arico is building Michigan into a power just as she did St Johns. Strong coach. Making her way into the top ranks of top coaches.

When was St Johns a power?

 

[visitingcock]

One week later and several losses in this 16. Anybody fall out?

 

[visitingcock]

Massey has Stanford, UConn, SC and Baylor as the Top four. My amateur eye test can’t disagree.

Look at Massey’s strength of schedule. Compare the records and SOS of Baylor and Maryland. Why should Baylor be ranked above Maryland?

I hate that the NET does not show its SOS . Too me, that should be one of the most important factors in the algorithm.

 

[Vowelguy]

Look at Massey’s strength of schedule. Compare the records and SOS of Baylor and Maryland. Why should Baylor be ranked above Maryland?

I hate that the NET does not show its SOS . Too me, that should be one of the most important factors in the algorithm.

Sos shown here

The NET Nitty Gritty Report for NCAA Women's College Basketball | WarrenNolan.com

The NET Nitty Gritty Report for 2021 NCAA Womens College Basketball. This Is a Duplication of the Report Used by the Tournament Selection Committee to Determine At-Large Teams with Quadrants

warrennolan.com

 

[visitingcock]

Sos shown here

The NET Nitty Gritty Report for NCAA Women's College Basketball | WarrenNolan.com

The NET Nitty Gritty Report for 2021 NCAA Womens College Basketball. This Is a Duplication of the Report Used by the Tournament Selection Committee to Determine At-Large Teams with Quadrants

warrennolan.com

Thanks and WOW!

The difference in NET SoS and Massey's is incredible. NET really treats the PAC schedule like crap and favors the SEC tams' SoS. I felt like Massey gave too much credit to the PAC's "closed system" in SoS. I gotta say it looks like the NET undervalues their schedule too much.

UCLA with the 125th ranked schedule? Texas A&M ranked 30th best schedule? WOW.

i'm and SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC guy all the way, but WOW! Just WOW!