Well Cambage, Griner, Howard, and Jones play the 5 so they should have at least a 4 as a starter other than the captains.Who do you think she should replace.
Well Cambage, Griner, Howard, and Jones play the 5 so they should have at least a 4 as a starter other than the captains.Who do you think she should replace.
Ahh - got it.It does count 50% towards picking the starters.
The reserves are chosen by the coaches.
Natasha Howard. Seriously, my first thought when I saw Pheesa wasn't included was that maybe they'll select her to replace Howard.Who do you think she should replace.
Be careful Dookie. You're critisizing NAPHEESA COLLIER on a Uconn fan site. Tread softly. Most of us here got our Collier tatoos four years ago and she's never given us any reason to regret it.Who do you think she should replace.
Be careful Dookie. You're critisizing NAPHEESA COLLIER on a Uconn fan site. Tread softly. Most of us here got our Collier tatoos four years ago and she's never given us any reason to regret it.
You're right triad. I meant to say questioning and to just point out that loyalty to Napheesa on this site runs deep. I follow her every game online, watch her when I can, think she may be my favorite alltime Huskie but I can't answer your question. I don't know who she could replace.ain't nobody criticizing nobody.... I just asked the question... Who should she replace? On what planet is that a criticism? Lawd Hammercy
Not enough in my opinion.
You're right triad. I meant to say questioning and to just point out that loyalty to Napheesa on this site runs deep. I follow her every game online, watch her when I can, think she may be my favorite alltime Huskie but I can't answer your question. I don't know who she could replace.
Ok, but I think given the evidence, Collier didn't have many "critics" during her time at UConn.
In fact, I think the main reason she didn't receive even more praise during her college career was because she was classmates with KLS, who also happened to be selected two slots higher than her in the draft.
Uh, probably because she's injured?Still scratch my head at that. KLS is playing the lease less than several 2nd round picks. It's not like she is on a loaded team or anything. She has only played in 4 games thus far. That is pretty low compared to several other picks lower than her.
If selection to the All-Star team as a starter was based upon an efficiency rating, Napheesa would have been a starter. But it is based upon a number of factors. I still think fan voting should be the least important factor since obviously what team you play for and the size of your fan base can make a big difference. Napheesa is a great player, an All-Star, and she has many years of WNBA basketball ahead of her. Not sure what the problem is. Does she deserve to be a starter at her position? Maybe, but let her pay her dues and earn her stripes. She'll be fine.
Still scratch my head at that. KLS is playing the lease less than several 2nd round picks. It's not like she is on a loaded team or anything. She has only played in 4 games thus far. That is pretty low compared to several other picks lower than her.
Not only did she get injured, she got injured at the worst possible time.
She had probably her best minutes of the season in the game where she got injured and with Faulkner still out and Ndour at Eurobasket there would have been more opportunity for playing time.
Now, she's healthy again, but Faulkner and Ndour are back too. James Wade has been rolling with a rotation of Sloot-Quigley-DeShields-Lavender-Dolson (starters) and Williams, Copper, Parker (bench). Chicago isn't loaded but the Sky are fairly deep. KLS needs to play the 3 but she's like the 4th option at that position behind DeShields, Copper, and Williams.
Fair to question why they picked her in the first place because they had depth on the wing. I've been critical of Wade for not playing her enough myself. However, he is under pressure to make the playoffs and the standings are bunched pretty tight right now. It's easy for me to say Lou should play more from section 124.
If selection to the All-Star team as a starter was based upon an efficiency rating, Napheesa would have been a starter. But it is based upon a number of factors. I still think fan voting should be the least important factor since obviously what team you play for and the size of your fan base can make a big difference. Napheesa is a great player, an All-Star, and she has many years of WNBA basketball ahead of her. Not sure what the problem is. Does she deserve to be a starter at her position? Maybe, but let her pay her dues and earn her stripes. She'll be fine.
Great minds think alike.I'd like to see her replace Howard.