College teams should be allowed no more than 2 top 30 rated players | Page 3 | The Boneyard

College teams should be allowed no more than 2 top 30 rated players

RichZ

Fort the ead!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,299
Reaction Score
22,659
It makes a ton of sense and levels the playing ground. Whats going on at Kentucky and Duke is not reasonable and doesnt provide a fair playing ground

Artificially leveling the playing field is the first step toward a mentality that takes down the scoreboards and awards participation trophies.
 

crazyUCfan23

Long live the Civil ConFLiCT
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Messages
1,025
Reaction Score
2,906
The title of this thread is quite honestly one of, if not, the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
 

RayIsTheGOAT

Sticks, to the rafters
Joined
Apr 5, 2015
Messages
2,960
Reaction Score
20,774
When our own program goes to , let's change the rules for everyone else in order to level the playing field for us.

I quite like this idea.

Until we start winning again and get high end recruits then we should probably change it back.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
17,197
Reaction Score
27,546
There's no incentive from a tv ratings perspective to try to address this. The networks are quite happy to show Duke, Kentucky, North Carolina, MSU, and Kansas' every game. Why would they want things to be more balanced? Let them divide up the top 10-15 players every season for their one and done and then move on.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
8,896
Reaction Score
8,431
yep....too many top women play at UConn...right?

This idea just is not a good one,,IMHO
 

Online statistics

Members online
321
Guests online
2,280
Total visitors
2,601

Forum statistics

Threads
161,207
Messages
4,254,658
Members
10,097
Latest member
Hillside


.
Top Bottom