College point shaving indictments | Page 4 | The Boneyard
.-.

College point shaving indictments

That's the insane part.

You're gonna put six figures on props bets involving Tulane basketball?

Just drive yourself to the FBI office.
None of these teams are creme de creme of the NIL department. This has a lot to do with this. Also its not just the players coaches have to be involved given the level of play seen in these vids
 
You have to wonder if the whole team including coaches were involved. If Calhoun had ever seen any of his guys playing as bad as 3 and 10 they'd have splinters in their arses from the bench

When you're nearly a double digit underdog in the first half of a MAC game, playing like ass is sort of a given.
 
I would need a straitjacket after that one. Yikes.*

I lost a live bet on an Under last week because a team fouled intentionally while down 16(!) in the final minute. Makes you wonder if players or even coaches are manipulating spreads or totals.

*Actually, now that I think about this, that did happen to me. I had South Carolina beating the UConn women -4.5 or -5.5, and we cut like a 12 point lead to 4 in the final minute. I should have just bet the moneyline.
Maybe stop betting on CBB?
 
That's the insane part.

You're gonna put six figures on props bets involving Tulane basketball?

Just drive yourself to the FBI office.
These clearly aren't the brightest people. If Vegas put a betting line on Conn College vs. Wesleyan this crew would be rigging that game.
 
All the player prop stuff now is crazy. I never bet that stuff. I would think that would be easier to throw. Like if the player takes an under of 18 pts, when they get to 16, they might pass the ball more the final few mins. Or foul out.
 
.-.
Maybe stop betting on CBB?
I'm up about 24K in 4 years doing this (not only CBB), so, uh

I Dont Think So Captain America GIF by Chris Cimino
 
.-.
I certainly hope we NEVER see UConn players involved in any of this. Would totally suck! Personally I don’t like gambling, never have. I will say I always like when we don’t cover the spread, though. Gambling can make fans into a$&holes.
Almost. Another reason I’m glad Etienne never committed. He’s one of the charged defendants.
 
The Marquette/NC State game in 2024 was one of the fishiest games I can remember. Marquette was a 6.5 point favorite and the over/under was 151.5. This was a really good Marquette team.

Joplin and Mitchell simultaneously had the worst game I think I ever saw either of them have. During the season, Joplin shot 50% from 2 and 35.5% from 3. Mitchell was 63.1% and 26.5%. In that game, Joplin was 2-10 overall, 0-7 from 3, 0-3 from the free throw line. Mitchell was 2-8, 0-4, 4-5. They were a combined 0-11 from 3.

The thing that really stuck out about the game was the passing. They didn't turn the ball over much, but none of their passes were clean. Cam Jones could be wide open on the perimeter, and the pass would be at his knees or 2 feet to his left. Not bad enough to result in a turnover, but it was hard to catch and shoot off a really bad pass. There were probably 10 of those, maybe more. If I was going to fix a game, and I didn't want it to show up in the box score, that is how I would do it. Just be a little off with my passes, and my teammates either wouldn't take their shots or would take a contested one after they gathered it.

I watched the game with a buddy of mine, and we both saw the same thing. And you could hide huge bets on a Sweet 16 game and no one would catch it.

 
The Marquette/NC State game in 2024 was one of the fishiest games I can remember. Marquette was a 6.5 point favorite and the over/under was 151.5. This was a really good Marquette team.

Joplin and Mitchell simultaneously had the worst game I think I ever saw either of them have. During the season, Joplin shot 50% from 2 and 35.5% from 3. Mitchell was 63.1% and 26.5%. In that game, Joplin was 2-10 overall, 0-7 from 3, 0-3 from the free throw line. Mitchell was 2-8, 0-4, 4-5. They were a combined 0-11 from 3.

The thing that really stuck out about the game was the passing. They didn't turn the ball over much, but none of their passes were clean. Cam Jones could be wide open on the perimeter, and the pass would be at his knees or 2 feet to his left. Not bad enough to result in a turnover, but it was hard to catch and shoot off a really bad pass. There were probably 10 of those, maybe more. If I was going to fix a game, and I didn't want it to show up in the box score, that is how I would do it. Just be a little off with my passes, and my teammates either wouldn't take their shots or would take a contested one after they gathered it.

I watched the game with a buddy of mine, and we both saw the same thing. And you could hide huge bets on a Sweet 16 game and no one would catch it.

That was fishy but with those stakes? I'm likely naive.
 
The Marquette/NC State game in 2024 was one of the fishiest games I can remember. Marquette was a 6.5 point favorite and the over/under was 151.5. This was a really good Marquette team.

Joplin and Mitchell simultaneously had the worst game I think I ever saw either of them have. During the season, Joplin shot 50% from 2 and 35.5% from 3. Mitchell was 63.1% and 26.5%. In that game, Joplin was 2-10 overall, 0-7 from 3, 0-3 from the free throw line. Mitchell was 2-8, 0-4, 4-5. They were a combined 0-11 from 3.

The thing that really stuck out about the game was the passing. They didn't turn the ball over much, but none of their passes were clean. Cam Jones could be wide open on the perimeter, and the pass would be at his knees or 2 feet to his left. Not bad enough to result in a turnover, but it was hard to catch and shoot off a really bad pass. There were probably 10 of those, maybe more. If I was going to fix a game, and I didn't want it to show up in the box score, that is how I would do it. Just be a little off with my passes, and my teammates either wouldn't take their shots or would take a contested one after they gathered it.

I watched the game with a buddy of mine, and we both saw the same thing. And you could hide huge bets on a Sweet 16 game and no one would catch it.

Nobody is throwing a Sweet 16 game.
 
.-.
The Marquette/NC State game in 2024 was one of the fishiest games I can remember. Marquette was a 6.5 point favorite and the over/under was 151.5. This was a really good Marquette team.

Joplin and Mitchell simultaneously had the worst game I think I ever saw either of them have. During the season, Joplin shot 50% from 2 and 35.5% from 3. Mitchell was 63.1% and 26.5%. In that game, Joplin was 2-10 overall, 0-7 from 3, 0-3 from the free throw line. Mitchell was 2-8, 0-4, 4-5. They were a combined 0-11 from 3.

The thing that really stuck out about the game was the passing. They didn't turn the ball over much, but none of their passes were clean. Cam Jones could be wide open on the perimeter, and the pass would be at his knees or 2 feet to his left. Not bad enough to result in a turnover, but it was hard to catch and shoot off a really bad pass. There were probably 10 of those, maybe more. If I was going to fix a game, and I didn't want it to show up in the box score, that is how I would do it. Just be a little off with my passes, and my teammates either wouldn't take their shots or would take a contested one after they gathered it.

I watched the game with a buddy of mine, and we both saw the same thing. And you could hide huge bets on a Sweet 16 game and no one would catch it.

You really think they were throwing a sweet 16 game? Come on, those guys want to be pros and they had a chance at a national championship. I watched the game and the team was awful but Joplin was only a 35.5% three point shooter and Mitchell 26.5%. Sometimes horrible nights just happen for players and teams. We've seen it with our own team/players and other teams and players.
 
Newsflash: College sports is crooked. Always has been, always will be.

You can go back 50 years to players getting bags of money, girls, cars, etc. NIL helped with some of that, but I'm sure there is squishy NIL and non-NIL situations nowadays. You have recruiting violations, contacting players outside the rules. Coaches in cahoots with scumbag sneaker reps and agents. Players committing serious legal crimes (drunk driving, sexual allegations, etc) and somehow that getting swept under the rug.

The marketing of college sports is great with the yeah-rah-rah good ol' fashioned Americana playing to the masses...but make no mistake, it's always been and always will have a slimy undercurrent.
True. There is no industry in the world, especially when billions of dollars are involved, where shady stuff doesnt continuously go down.
Even in the Vatican....for God's sake.
 

They recruited players at the following schools to fix point spreads for the first halves or entire games: Nicholls State, Tulane, Northwestern (La.) State, Saint Louis, La Salle, Fordham, Buffalo, DePaul, Robert Morris, Southern Mississippi, North Carolina A&T, Kennesaw State, Coppin State, New Orleans, Abilene Christian, Eastern Michigan and Alabama State.
Paying a DePaul player to throw a game seems redundant.
 
Paying a DePaul player to throw a game seems redundant.
It would be kind of like paying people in northeast Mass to avoid BC games. You're buying something that you could get for free.
 
.-.
Too bad we've already played DePaul twice. It would be a fun in-game contest to see who can identify the point shavers!
They aren't talking about this years DePaul team. I saw them live vs UConn and they played extremely hard. Twice.
 

Online statistics

Members online
87
Guests online
2,844
Total visitors
2,931

Forum statistics

Threads
166,448
Messages
4,479,859
Members
10,353
Latest member
tomasito


Top Bottom