Hope this works...
I know this board is focused on sports, but colleges are going to be in a world of hurt if classes don't start in the fall due to revenues collapsing in a much bigger way than the negative impact of no football. Imagine a whole semester of no tuition, no fees, no room and board, ... If your university has a hospital, revenues are way down due to the cancellation of elective surgeries. Every part of a university will have to experience severe cost cuts, including the athletic department. If Harvard, with a $40 billion endowment, is laying off and furloughing employees, I would bet all colleges will need to.At some point, football will have to play...it funds the Title IX sports...
Without funding...the women's sports die along with the non revenue sports..
I know that the Trustees at FSU were told that FSU will be good into the fall...
But..after fall ? Who knows?
"We will be OK going into the fall, I can assure you of that," Thrasher said, before acknowledging that the future could be cloudy if the campus is unable to open the campus to students in the fall.
Michigan's president is forecasting a $400 million to $1 billion loss as a result of COVID-19. They have started furloughs, salary cuts, construction freezes, etc. It's going to be a bloodbath for colleges.What some may have not noted...the uni's got part of that stimulus package...
"According to reports, the University of Central Florida will be receiving the largest amount in Florida’s University System, at $51 million, with $25.5 million for students.
Florida State University will receive $29.3 million, with $14.7 million for students.
FSU President John Thrasher said the university is in sound financial shape and there have been no furloughs or layoffs.
“As far as Florida State University goes, with the federal assistance we’ll get, about $30 million, we’ll be in good shape.”
Its so great the guy on a ridge in North Carolina comes to the UConn football board (of all places) to keep us in yankee country informed on all things Florida State.FSU has a hiring freeze...construction freeze...and has losses from paid covid leave....continueing maintenance, etc How much in the end, who knows?
Its so great the guy on a ridge in North Carolina comes to the UConn football board (of all places) to keep us in yankee country informed on all things Florida State.
Hell...I come here to learn what Michigan is doing re covid...
You never get it.... but whatever - you are a part of our odd little community anywayHell...I come here to learn what Michigan is doing re covid...
You never get it.... but whatever - you are a part of our odd little community anyway
I would imagine a quick turnaround or pushing the start of the season back to mid September. However, the latter would require more work. I think they would just roll into the season with a shortened Summer practice schedule.If they do play in the spring...(I assume it is OK medically)...do they turn right around in August with the regular fall schedule?
Quck turn around...
It depends on where in the curve you are....come spring. Some areas may be pushing prior to spring.
And political will....the President of South Carolina has stated that students will be brought back to the university as soon as the Governor allows it....In Georgia, restaurants open back up Monday...and gyms, barber shops, salons, opened up yesterday.
The Mayor of LA already said you aren’t playing there so there is that. No home games for USC. UCLA actually plays in Pasadena which I think is a separate city but I’m guessing not there either. I also don’t see Oregon or Washington playing.It is possible that it becomes every conference for themselves as COVID-19 has hit different states harder. Thus, colleges in some states may open for the fall and some may be closed. My guess is the universities in the states hardest hit by the virus are the ones most likely to not open for the fall. So which conferences would be most impacted?
Using the NY Times deaths per 100,000 data (in paper 4/22) and analyzing it by each state in a conference:
Big 12 states: average = 2.2 deaths per 100k, median = 2.6 deaths per 100k
Pac 12 states: average = 4.4 deaths per 100k, median = 3.0 deaths per 100k
SEC states: average = 6.1 deaths per 100k, median = 3.8 deaths per 100k
AAC states: average = 7.9 deaths per 100k, median = 4.0 deaths per 100k.
Big 10 states: average = 12.7 deaths per 100k, median = 9.4 deaths per 100k
ACC states + ND: average = 15.0 deaths per 100k, median = 5.7 deaths per 100k
States hardest hit by coronavirus:
1. NY @ 76.2 deaths per 100k: Syracuse (ACC)
2. NJ @ 53.5 deaths per 100k: Rutgers (Big 10)
3. Louisiana @ 30.2 deaths per 100k: LSU (SEC) and Tulane (AAC)
4. Massachusetts @ 28.5 deaths per 100k: BC (ACC)
5. Michigan @ 27 deaths per 100k: Michigan (Big 10) and Michigan St. (Big 10)
6. Pennsylvania @ 12.3 deaths per 100k: Penn St. (Big 10), Pitt (ACC), Temple (AAC)
7. Illinois @ 11.7 deaths per 100k: Illinois (Big 10) and Northwestern (Big 10)
8. Maryland @ 9.7 deaths per 100k: Maryland (Big 10) and Navy (AAC)
9. Indiana @ 9.4 deaths per 100k: Indiana (Big 10), Purdue (Big 10), Notre Dame (ACC)
10. Washington @ 9.0 deaths per 100k: Washington (Pac 12) and Washington St. (Pac 12)
Conference schools in the hardest hit 10 states:
Big 12 = 0
SEC = 1
Pac 12 = 2
AAC = 3
ACC = 4 (including ND)
Big 10 = 9
When I look at the data, I think the Big 12 and SEC could play in the fall. Pac 12 is up in the air, but my guess is it will depend on what the Governor of California decides about allowing universities to open. The AAC has some problem areas. The southern schools in the ACC could probably play, but not the northern schools. Would the ACC do that? Finally, I don't see how the Big 10 plays football this fall.