
She stated she does everything perfectly in drills but when she steps on the court in real games she gets frazzled. It shows how much the mental and emotional make up of a person influence a person's performance. She is confident in practice, but not in real game situations.
I agree with you and VTCW. With Stef on the bench due to foul trouble, no one was able to stop the dribble penetration. Heather may have been able to. I know Geno is averse to putting players into the game if their practice was not effective, but it worked against Baylor. I think he needed to gamble in the situation against N.D. What was the worst that would have happened--a loss?Given that his team was gassed, and given that Heather had shown that she was at least able to defend and rebound, if only to spell a few players for 2-3 minutes at a time, Geno's decision not to use Heather at all in that game will remain one of the few really big question marks in his great career.
The worse that can happen depends on the nature of the player. If Heather has the personality that is afraid of failure, than a bad game can reenforce her fears. So play her in situations in which she has the least chance of making mistakes that are costly to the games outcome. If she has the personality that is fearful of authoritative judgement, then allowing her to play and not take her mistakes to task would help her develop confidence. And if she has fears of both, that is very hard to overcome.I agree with you and VTCW. With Stef on the bench due to foul trouble, no one was able to stop the dribble penetration. Heather may have been able to. I know Geno is averse to putting players into the game if their practice was not effective, but it worked against Baylor. I think he needed to gamble in the situation against N.D. What was the worst that would have happened--a loss?
Yeah, there could have been confidence/psychological harm. On the other hand, if Heather had bailed us out, her confidence could have soared. We'll never know. In terms of the game result, I think we would have fared somewhat better. Enough to pull out a win? Maybe.The worse that can happen depends on the nature of the player. If Heather has the personality that is afraid of failure, than a bad game can reenforce her fears. So play her in situations in which she has the least chance of making mistakes that are costly to the games outcome. If she has the personality that is fearful of authoritative judgement, then allowing her to play and not take her mistakes to task would help her develop confidence. And if she has fears of both, that is very hard to overcome.
If I were to guess, I'd say that Heather doesn't want to let anyone down. Thinking about the shudda cudda of the prior play makes you tentative. She does seem like a good kid, polite and genuine. Her parents seem very nice as well. I hope she has a breakout year as well. I think it a little bit of success could allow her to play to her potential. Can't help but to root for her.this is exactly why I dont think "good in practice" is more helpful than "real-game" situations.
deep down inside you know you're teammates arent you enemies...and its not real (as much as we want to believe Geno practices are) and you dont have 10,000 yelling "shoot the ball Heather".
I totally understand what she's going thru
"]The worse that can happen depends on the nature of the player. If Heather has the personality that is afraid of failure, than a bad game can reenforce her fears. So play her in situations in which she has the least chance of making mistakes that are costly to the games outcome. If she has the personality that is fearful of authoritative judgement, then allowing her to play and not take her mistakes to task would help her develop confidence. And if she has fears of both, that is very hard to overcome."
Isn't the primary goal to win the game, especially in the tournament? If they lose and Heather was ineffective, she still has an off-season to try and improve, and with another year of maturity, the chances of being permanently damaged for good would seem relatively small. Anyway, we will never know and the game was lost and the other players has little rest.
this is exactly why I dont think "good in practice" is more helpful than "real-game" situations.
deep down inside you know you're teammates arent you enemies...and its not real (as much as we want to believe Geno practices are) and you dont have 10,000 yelling "shoot the ball Heather".
I totally understand what she's going thru
"]Isn't the primary goal to win the game, especially in the tournament? If they lose and Heather was ineffective, she still has an off-season to try and improve, and with another year of maturity, the chances of being permanently damaged for good would seem relatively small. Anyway, we will never know and the game was lost and the other players has little rest.
I agree with Scotter up to a point. I think he would use a regular season game--even during or after a 90-game streak--as a teaching moment. I am not sure he would--or should--in a Final Four game.Scotter, a very interesting observation and one worth considering.
And I thought you had ice in your veins. Must be climate change that is getting to you.People yelling shoot the ball Heather doesn't bother me at all. It's when they start yelling shoot the ball Ice that gets to me.
She stated she does everything perfectly in drills but when she steps on the court in real games she gets frazzled. It shows how much the mental and emotional make up of a person influence a person's performance. She is confident in practice, but not in real game situations.
If I have correctly interpreted Geno's intentions I don't necessarily view those intentions as necessarily morally correct. It is moral grey area in my opinion.I agree with Scotter up to a point. I think he would use a regular season game--even during or after a 90-game streak--as a teaching moment. I am not sure he would--or should--in a Final Four game.
I have always thought Heather could be our secret weapon... I hope this is her year of coming out...
I agree... Heather wasnt getting burn against cellar dwellers, in my opinion thats more harmful than trying but failing in a Final Four game.I agree with Scotter up to a point. I think he would use a regular season game--even during or after a 90-game streak--as a teaching moment. I am not sure he would--or should--in a Final Four game.
2 things.
1. Geno definitely wants to win championships. Maybe not any any cost, but his team was exhausted, he had a not exactly totally inept Heather on the bench, and Heather could scarcely get a confidence boost by being nailed to the bench. I do not recollect that during tournament time, she was noted to have been ailing very much.
2. I will never, ever , ever, yell "Shoot Ice, Shoot."
The following comments aren't meant to, in any way, suggest that Coach A isn't outstanding at what he does. And they are most certainly not meant to start a firestorm.
But, IMHO, in the ND game the coach froze at a critical time when the game situation required that he move away from his comfort zone, i.e., not using players who may not have performed well in practice.
Also, wasn't there another important game, it may have been the 89th or 90th in the streak, when an assisntant had to suggest to him that he make a critical substitution that led to a win?
My point is this: IMHO, sometimes during close games Coach A is just too stubborn. He appears to be unwilling to move outside of his comfort zone.
These are, of course, just my opinions.
John Fryer
I can relate. I have played tennis my entire life. When I just hit in practice I look like I could compete quite well. When keeping score becomes involved I tighten up and can't hit some of the shots that seem second nature in practice. Sports are sooooo mental.
Easy solution. Hit a bucket of balls for each shot of your round and play the best one - kind of an individual scramble format. It elevates the mulligan to a totally new level.
I agree... those rules/teachings may have worked in the 90's & early 2000's but these days he need to move out of his comfort zone.