Clemson @ Notre Dame - 12/29/19 | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Clemson @ Notre Dame - 12/29/19

Who will win this game?

  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .
Shades said:
Doubt it, unless there’s a player deserving of minutes not getting them. That’s hard to imagine with how bad this team is playing.

What’s ND’s 2020 class looking like?
Expand ...
Highest ranked player is # 23 coming in. They do have 4 out of the top 100 i believe.
 
Instead of pumping the brakes, CLEM should be letting Spray shoot for that three pt record. ;)
 
.-.
Sorry to hijack this thread, but I couldn’t find anywhere else to post a comment about the Villanova-Providence game. Watched this game for a quarter. Neither one of these teams will be a threat (in the next two years) to UConn when they join the NBE next year. These two programs would fit “comfortably” and seamlessly into the AAC.
 
Last edited:
Our walkons were better than ND's walkons. :)
 
As bad as ND looked with Sniezek on the floor, they looked even worse without her in there to flop on every defensive possession :cool:

I just feel so sorry for Notre Dame. It's hard to find the words to express my sorrow, so I'll have to use nonverbal communication


chair dance 2.gif
 
Last edited:
Besides Spray, that kid Thorton really lit up the mid range. Strong release and smooth stroke. .
 
.-.
71-55 CLEM final

Spray 24 pts (8-14 from three)
Thornton 23 pts, 6 reb
 
DefenseBB said:
I can’t find Marta on the bench either

there was flow with her?
Expand ...
Point taken. Maybe with her there is a semblance of flow.... there was absolutely none today.
 
Clemson is not as bad as their record. They played some good teams Alabama, Penn State, South Carolina, Maryland, Iowa, Florida state...

Still, a pretty dreadful loss for ND. Not a NCAA team this year. To bad, so sad... (NOT!)...
 
EricLA said:
Clemson is not as bad as their record. They played some good teams Alabama, Penn State, South Carolina, Maryland, Iowa, Florida state...

Still, a pretty dreadful loss for ND. Not a NCAA team this year. To bad, so sad... (NOT!)...
Expand ...
Well, I'm gonna wait at least a few more weeks before making funeral arrangements. They were missing Sniezek here, which I believe did matter in this game.
 
.-.
Looked as if Clemson tried to give the game away in the fourth quarter, especially the tall player who kept making bad passes into the post. ND had Vaughn playing today but it made little difference.
 
Plebe said:
As bad as ND looked with Sniezek on the floor, they looked even worse without her in there to flop on every defensive possession :cool:

I just feel so sorry for Notre Dame. It's hard to find the words to express my sorrow, so I'll have to use nonverbal communication


View attachment 49498
Expand ...
You nailed it - Stanford fans aren't missing her, but Sniezek is great at taking a charge and while she's offensively challenged at everything but trying to drive in the lane and hope for something to happen (foul or layup), she is a great passer, relatively stable ball-handler, and has a high basketball IQ, so she makes the players around her look better. In the case of ND, it's shocking to realize that they could, and did, look substantially worse without her...
 
Clemson played way better than they did in the Maryland game. They actually shut out Thornton in that game.
 
.-.
EricLA said:
Clemson is not as bad as their record. They played some good teams Alabama, Penn State, South Carolina, Maryland, Iowa, Florida state...

Still, a pretty dreadful loss for ND. Not a NCAA team this year. To bad, so sad... (NOT!)...
Expand ...
SC beat Clemson by 36 - at Clemson - and Dawn Staley called off the dogs in the 4th quarter. Clemson may have played some tough teams, but they weren't competitive. ND must be awful.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,331
Messages
4,564,759
Members
10,464
Latest member
Rollskies27


Top Bottom