- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 16,967
- Reaction Score
- 39,523
YES. YES THEY WERE. IDIOTS WITH FLAMES SHOOTING OUT OF THEIR HEADS. 4 points and 3 rebounds per game? One monster outburst against UCF? People think that we send players to league "because we're UConn and we have some magic secret sauce that makes kids stars whenever they put on the uniform." Look at all of the big men we brought in who went to the league. They were all universally regarded so, so much higher than Brimah ever was. Take a gander at some of the bigs who've entered early the past few years. How many of them only had UConn and La Salle as their only DI offers?
This makes no sense when viewed in context with your comments on Carlton. Low-ranked kids like Brimah are expected to be good as lottery picks, yet Carlton's lack of a spot in the Top 100 is indicative of the sky falling?
You're a smart guy, so I'm disappointed you ignored the nuance of what I was saying.
Brimah was a low-rated recruit, who nonetheless showed flashes (not UCF, which was clearly an outlier) of great potential as a freshman. He was arguably more capable than Thabeet was as a freshman.
NBA draft talk aside, it wasn't unreasonable to evaluate Brimah's freshman year and say "holy s***, if this guy develops over 2-3 years, he's going to be a monster".
And then he never developed. Scarcely any improvement in rebounding, offensive arsenal, feel for the game.
Year 1: Brimah was a pleasant surprise
expectations reasonably re-adjusted
Year 2-4: Brimah was a massive disappointment relative to those more recent expectations based on more information
Why would you evaluate Brimah's years 2-4 based on his recruiting ranking and not based on what he showed in year 1?