I wonder how often Nebrich thinks about the prophetic BC coach who recruited him last year?
It was a waste because you can always use a kid, even if you originally planned to redshirt him, if you need him later in the season. And it isn't like he's had all this experience. A few plays here and there. If we need to use him, he'll pick up a comparable amount of experience in his first couple of series. Here's the thing. If he ahd been redshirted, then its likely Box stays around and we have McEntee backed up by Box and McCummings. Nebrich learns the system, gets acclamated to the college game and is ready to take over next year andwe have a starter for the next 4 years if he turns out to be what everyone thought he might be. In my view, the way the quarterback situation was handled may actually have hurt his development,aand even if it didn't, it likely wasted a year. As I said in August, and I stand by it, barring an injury, Nebrich should only have seen the field this year if he was clearly superior to the other alternatives. 99% of the time, a quarterback is far more valuable as a 5th year senior than as a true freshman. At this point in the season it is pretty clear that the coaching staff was not convinced that Nebrich was the best option. He was clearly NOT superior to the others. Every effort should have been made to allow him to redshirt.
Carl,You're saying a lot in there that I don't think you've got really anything to go on beside whatever your own thought process is.
These coaches went through their red shirt determinations a long time ago and Nebrich didn't fit a red shirt, and he still doesn't. The only way Nebrich would have had a shirt this year is if Endres was still on the roster, and when Box left (which clearly means that Nebrich was better than at least one of the four QB's on the roster) any shot of a red shirt left with him.
Are you seriously advocating going through a 12 game college football season with 2 QB's in McEntee and McCummings, and Driscoll?
You think that guys like Pasqualoni, DeLeone, and Brown are rookies at making red shirt determinations? Do you know when you actually do that kind of thing during the course of football year?
If there's anything you can be confident about when it comes to this coachign staff right now, it's in their ability to recruit for a football program sitting in the middle of Connecticut, and their ability to determine if a player is capable and ready to compete at te level necessary to play against the opponents we've got lined up.
Nebrich worked hard enough, and improved enough from January to August 2011 not to wear a red shirt. How in the hell is this hurting his development as a QB?
P.S. Have you seen what Edsall is doing to the QB's in Maryland?
Carl,
I didn't say any of that. I said that Nebrich should have redshirted this year. he clearly isn't the best quarterback and now he's wasted a whole year in order to prove what the coaches knew by the first Saturday in Sedptember, because if they thought he was the best, he, not McEntee would have played most of the Fordham game and most of the Vandy and every other game. It was a waste of a season if all he gets used is a handful of series this year. Now deciding to redshirt him doesn't mean that in case of an injury he won't get into a game if you need him. Saying you want to redshirt a player doesn't mean you can't change your mind midway through the season. But this is a player that many think could be the future of the program. He has played something like 15 plays in 3 games. so now he has 3 years remaining. Assuming he earns the starting job next year, and turns out as good as some think he will, we've wasted an entire season so he could get 15 plays from scrimmage. to me, it was a foolish decision by Pasqualoni and DeLeone and one they should have known better than to have made. I can think of no good reason why they would waste a whole year of eligibility on 15 plays. As I said back in August, a 5th year senior quarterback is of more value than the same player as a true freshman. They SHOULD have gone into the season with MacEntee as the starter, backed up by McCummings and if MacEntee didn't cut it, or got hurt you can always re-visit the Nebrich redshirt issue. Let the kid learn in practice and holding a clipboard until you need him. If things go well, you never need him. And you have 4 full seasons of play from your most important player.
I'm at a loss as to what Edsall and maryland have to do with this decision, for what it is worth.
Didn't Coach P CLEARLY state that if you're 1st on the depth chart, even if you are a walk on, you automatically get a scholly?i may be wrong, but i dont think he has a scholly.
I don't see how anyone can think it would make sense to try and redshirt your QB2 -- if he gets called into action in week 8 or 9 and hasn't played a down, you'd all be calling that stupid coaching.... it's clear the staff does not see mccummings as an everydown qb so redshirting nebrich was off the table when box left...
I agree completely. I think the concept that nebrich didnt' get a non-medical redshirt, given our depth chart after 2010 going into 2011, and then after the way things worked out from January to August 2011, it's just ridiculous and is a product of 12 years of Randy Edsall's football program, and it speaks to not really understanding that these coaches are doing everything they possibly can to develop this roster and win games.
Lamenting the loss of the luxury of the non-medical redshirt for Nebrich is fine. I do. He might not have a 5th year in his career, and you know what? I hope he doesn't earn a 5th year, because if he doesn't earn a 5th year at this point, it will mean that he'll finish his career in 4 years, with a degree, and having had productive and healthy career at the QB position. But to think that not using the shirt this year, is somehow going to regress the kid is plain wrong, and all I need to do is look at the big picture when it comes to the QB position and what's happened around it since 1984.
We're going to get that position on the field back to the level it needs to be. It's a pretty important thing, to a top notch football team, to have a productive QB on the field.
He's one snap away from being the starter and being the guy.
Again, if you decide to redshirt a player in September, it doesn't mean you can't change your mind in mid-October if circumstances warrant it. Redshirting is ALWAYS discretionary. So if Mac gets knocked out on Saturday, it is completely within the rules to bring Nebrich off the bench even though he was planning to redshirt. That is what UCONN did with Brown in 2005 or 2006 when both Bones and DJ Hernandez got banged up. Up tot hat point, the plan was that Brown would redshirt. You could do the same with Nebrich. And I seriously question the whole concept that he got all that much benefit from his 20 plays. I think he had 1 drive that lasted more than 3 or 4 plays. If he needs to play in the future, he is still completely inexperieinced. He'll see more action in the first half than he did in 5 games he played. Beyond that, lots of quarterbacks last a full season and lots of backups seldom if ever see the field. You have a competent guy who could handle a few plays in McCummings. If you have an injury and you need someone to take over full time for a game or a few games, you can revisit the redshirt matter. Nebrich didn't get those 20 plays because we needed him. He got them because this highly experienced coaching staff couldn't make a decision on who would be the quarterback or because they knew what the choice should be but didn't want to make it.Do you even know how many straight posts you've mentioned Randy Edsall? I'm defending P on this, but do you not realize that you are not defending the coaches but killing them every time you bring Edsall up in this discussion? P needs to be judged on what he does and does not do. Edsall has nothing to do with it, and your getting to pathetic need to mention him in every damn post makes it look like you're unwilling to simply defend P for making a choice based on what he inherited.
I wonder how often Nebrich thinks about the prophetic BC coach who recruited him last year?
Again, if you decide to redshirt a player in September, it doesn't mean you can't change your mind in mid-October if circumstances warrant it. Redshirting is ALWAYS discretionary. So if Mac gets knocked out on Saturday, it is completely within the rules to bring Nebrich off the bench even though he was planning to redshirt. That is what UCONN did with Brown in 2005 or 2006 when both Bones and DJ Hernandez got banged up. Up tot hat point, the plan was that Brown would redshirt. You could do the same with Nebrich. And I seriously question the whole concept that he got all that much benefit from his 20 plays. I think he had 1 drive that lasted more than 3 or 4 plays. If he needs to play in the future, he is still completely inexperieinced. He'll see more action in the first half than he did in 5 games he played. Beyond that, lots of quarterbacks last a full season and lots of backups seldom if ever see the field. You have a competent guy who could handle a few plays in McCummings. If you have an injury and you need someone to take over full time for a game or a few games, you can revisit the redshirt matter. Nebrich didn't get those 20 plays because we needed him. He got them because this highly experienced coaching staff couldn't make a decision on who would be the quarterback or because they knew what the choice should be but didn't want to make it.