Bryant Sheriff's best game ever, and the D was better | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Bryant Sheriff's best game ever, and the D was better

WingU-Conn said:
We know what we have with Bryant.

He’s not a D1 QB.

Tough to win when you don’t have a QB.

time to build for the future. Pindell should start.
Expand ...
to be fair, the staff thought Pindell should start at one point, too. Next years QB battle will be very strong with Pindell, Washington, Krajewski and McAfee.
 
noeynox said:
They played great for 55 minutes. Don't know what the hell has happened to Summers. Kid has regressed a ton, maybe he's nicked up.

Got great pressure from the DL today. Foley and Ormsby I think had 2 sacks each and even Luke finished one off instead of just barely missing. Britton, Joseph, Brayden, Diggs, and Terry all had impressive tackles near the LOS un run plays.

It looks like it's starting to come together in spite of today's ending.
Expand ...

Not saying much given his play, but I thought Summers played his best game of the season thus far.
 
.-.
JMick said:
to be fair, the staff thought Pindell should start at one point, too. Next years QB battle will be very strong with Pindell, Washington, Krajewski and McAfee.
Expand ...
To be fair. Most of the comments like this were made before Pindell was on the roster.
 
On Tulsa's last drive seeing two players get behind our defenders, Summers and Coyle, setting up the last play was just mind boggling. Giving up the short throw was not a problem there, giving up chunks and with the second to last play a better throw might have been a score.Head bang Should not have come down to that as Bryant said. Offense in the 4th Q not being able to run the ball and going 3 and out, after not getting a TD earlier at first and goal from a yard out set up a nerve wracking ending. Offense has to be able to put more points up. Nice to get this win though. Sets up next week as a big game for us and that did not look to be the case 3 weeks ago.
 
.-.
JMick said:
to be fair, the staff thought Pindell should start at one point, too. Next years QB battle will be very strong with Pindell, Washington, Krajewski and McAfee.
Expand ...

I'm a few beers in. I read that as McEntee and looked around my living room, assessed space and time, made several powerful arguments for Scott McCummings, and then reread your post.

Imagine my disappointment in realizing the 5-7 2011 UConn Huskies are only nostalgia!
 
Jax Husky said:
Summers almost cost us the game. How you let a guy get behind you with a minute left is inexcusable
Expand ...

You could also argue that he won us the game with his coverage on the final play.
 
Dogged said:
Shirreffs was very good today. He is a tough kid and brings leadership. The D was terrific until 4th quarter. We became less aggressive and didn’t blitz as much. If you send 4 on rush in 3-3-5 is that blitzing?
Expand ...
WingU-Conn said:
NC State pegged him as a FB so that’s obviously where he should play. Our coaches know nothing.
Expand ...

He was only among the 12th best QB in CFB on Pass Rating at 163...very disappointing. We need to find some talent.
 
We should have buried Tulsa in the first half, and then the defense fell apart at the end. Whatever. We really needed the win yesterday given the rest of our schedule, so I am not going to complain about anything that happened. I will take a win any way we can get it.
 
jdb50 said:
On Tulsa's last drive seeing two players get behind our defenders, Summers and Coyle, setting up the last play was just mind boggling. Giving up the short throw was not a problem there, giving up chunks and with the second to last play a better throw might have been a score.Head bang Should not have come down to that as Bryant said. Offense in the 4th Q not being able to run the ball and going 3 and out, after not getting a TD earlier at first and goal from a yard out set up a nerve wracking ending. Offense has to be able to put more points up. Nice to get this win though. Sets up next week as a big game for us and that did not look to be the case 3 weeks ago.
Expand ...

The fact that this is being said after a game where we scored 20 tells you a lot about the 2017 vs 2016 seasons.
 
.-.
Overall I agree it was as well as he has played as a Husky.

Sherriff went to secondary receivers yesterday. Great, I just wish it didn't take him five years to do it. And I'm sure Edsall was also pleased he didn't put the ball in danger very often. Great to have a no INT game. His throw to a wide open Davis that would have made it 24-0 was bad. Right into the dirt. Still, it was a very good performance especially since we provided no running game to help him.
 
Palatine said:
Overall I agree it was as well as he has played as a Husky.

Sherriff went to secondary receivers yesterday. Great, I just wish it didn't take him five years to do it. And I'm sure Edsall was also pleased he didn't put the ball in danger very often. Great to have a no INT game. His throw to a wide open Davis that would have made it 24-0 was bad. Right into the dirt. Still, it was a very good performance especially since we provided no running game to help him.
Expand ...

Wasn't that more in the receiver? Kinda looked like he attempted to stretch the ball over the goal line, then lost it. I agree it could have been thrown better, but it was in his hands.
 
TheDrifter75 said:
Wasn't that more in the receiver? Kinda looked like he attempted to stretch the ball over the goal line, then lost it. I agree it could have been thrown better, but it was in his hands.
Expand ...
Even if he caught it, I think he would have fallen to the ground before the goal line. It was a rare poor pass.
 
Agree for the most part on the O except for the fourth quarter when they were slow to start working the clock. That last series that Tulsa ran should never have even happened. The time left on the clock was a gift.
 
That was a very well coached game with excellent play calling. And also excellent execution. The O-line is our most glaring weakness.
 
.-.
Butch said:
That was a very well coached game with excellent play calling. And also excellent execution. The O-line is our most glaring weakness.
Expand ...
Definitely need to find a way to get a push on short yardage. Too many chances to come up empty. The pass protection is not shabby. The run blocking still sucks for the most part.

But, it's 10x better than it was last year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,259
Messages
4,560,165
Members
10,448
Latest member
MillerLitEd


Top Bottom