Ricky's performance the national championship was the stuff of legend. We had a bit of slow start and he kept us in it in the first half. Talk about a guy in a zone he was literally saying "can't guard me" but he didn't need to. Everyone knew. Then in the second half his defense was lock down, especially on the final two plays. It was just an amazing performance.Technically Kemba came before Bazz, but regardless it's not a problem and certainly not a bad problem to have. Shouldn't the goal be to bring in superior athletes and basketball players year after year? Don't you want to bring in better talent than the program has ever seen? Kemba is a UConn legend. At the PG spot, I don't think anyone outshines him and I'm a Ricky Moore homer. Moore will always be my favorite husky.
He shouldn’t start any of these games. Starting a freshman who’s been suspended is how you lose ur team. Hurley playing it the right way. He works his way back. Maybe he’s sixth man for the year who knows but he’s going to play 25 plus minutes a game.
Debates like these are dumb. Like you said, he's going to get burn. Hurley knows more about the team than us, so until he proves he can't coach, maybe we should chill on worrying about who starts a game.He shouldn’t start any of these games. Starting a freshman who’s been suspended is how you lose ur team. Hurley playing it the right way. He works his way back. Maybe he’s sixth man for the year who knows but he’s going to play 25 plus minutes a game.
My thoughts exactly, it's the reason why Hurley will not start Bouknight until next year. If Bouknight has two or three 30 point games, he could be one and done, and Hurley is not dumb enough to allow that to happen. His defense also still leaves alot to be desired, needs work.Don’t want him to be that great that quick. Guys that are that great tend to get picked high in nba draft quickly
I don't think DH would ever do that to a kid...You WANT kids leaving early if they are lottery picks....He is too much of a player's coach to ever put his own interest above a player's future IMO.My thoughts exactly, it's the reason why Hurley will not start Bouknight until next year. If Bouknight has two or three 30 point games, he could be one and done, and Hurley is not dumb enough to allow that to happen. His defense also still leaves alot to be desired, needs work.
I see you’ve begun posting again. Must be finished with your project.Debates like these are dumb. Like you said, he's going to get burn. Hurley knows more about the team than us, so until he proves he can't coach, maybe we should chill on worrying about who starts a game.
Coaches do that all the time, Boeheim did it for years, as did koach krap, and even Calhoun with certain players. Their mission is to win basketball games and Championships, and advise kids about getting their degree vs trying out for the NBA too soon, not to put kids in the NBA with no clue about what defense is and risk washing out, and ending up with nothing.I don't think DH would ever do that to a kid...You WANT kids leaving early if they are lottery picks....He is too much of a player's coach to ever put his own interest above a player's future IMO.
Polley is not as multi-dimensional a player as Bouk and needs a better supporting cast. On the first unit, he's our sniper. I think Bouk is better off the bench than Polley because he's a more complete player and can do more on his own. this makes the second team better and makes the team better overall.
During the Xavier game Bouknight had a really nice drive and dish to Whaley where he did a little hesitation move at the top of the key to freeze the defender before blowing by him. I thought to myself at the time I know I’ve seen him do that move before. It just dawned on me that that was the move he and Springs were practicing in that random workout video on YouTube. Check the video @1:35
Starting is overrated, quality time is important
AG is our best PG, and I'm trusting coach to make those decisions anyhow
Coaches do that all the time, Boeheim did it for years, as did koach krap, and even Calhoun with certain players. Their mission is to win basketball games and Championships, not to put kids in the NBA with no clue about what defense is.
Ricky's performance the national championship was the stuff of legend. We had a bit of slow start and he kept us in it in the first half. Talk about a guy in a zone he was literally saying "can't guard me" but he didn't need to. Everyone knew. Then in the second half his defense was lock down, especially on the final two plays. It was just an amazing performance.
We were up three; and don't forget Rashamel gave a lot of pressure on that last possession, too.For those too young to have lived through the 99 season, Ricky Moore's D was not lock down in the second half of the championship game. It was lock down pretty much every minute of every game all year long. Still the best defensive performance over the course of a year that I've ever seen.
Up 1 and Duke having the ball for the last full possession, you could have banked the W the moment it was clear K's idea was to let Langdon try to take Ricky Moore one on one. If you had paid attention to the season, there was close to a zero chance that that was going to result in Langdon getting a good shot.
We were up three; and don't forget Rashamel gave a lot of pressure on that last possession, too.
I'm almost positive he's talking about the possession where Duke had it and K had Langdon go at Moore one-on-one. The "TAKE HIM, TRAJAN!" moment.
Ok, I understand what you mean now; I'm just not familiar with your concept of "full possession" in contrast to what you would consider having the ball with six seconds left. Is there a term for the latter? If so, at what point--and on what basis--does it become distinct from what you are referring to as "full possession"?Thank you. I said last full possession. That's not having six seconds to go the length of the court needing a 3 to tie.
Playing them less to keep their point totals down and playing them less to keep them from improving their games are two different things, and I've got some news for you, players improve their games in practice. DuhWho are the players Calhoun played less to keep them from being good enough for the NBA too soon?
Ok, I understand what you mean now; I'm just not familiar with your concept of "full possession" in contrast to what you would consider having the ball with six seconds left. Is there a term for the latter? If so, at what point--and on what basis--does it become distinct from what you are referring to as "full possession"?
Playing them less to keep their point totals down and playing them less to keep them from improving their games are two different things, and I've got some news for you, players improve their games in practice. Duh
Oh horse s h it, you show me where a coach doesn't take a kid out (especially a frosh) after he scores 9 points in five minutes, and the crowd goes wild in giving the kid a hand as he sits down. a holeCoaches don't keep kids on the bench to prevent them from scoring too many points. Coaches, generally speaking, like scoring points.