Borges article on candidates | Page 8 | The Boneyard

Borges article on candidates

As much as I want Crean. I think its Hurley, I think DB already has a likely candidate close to lock up. Hurley will bring his recruits. This with hopefully Gilbert n Vital returning. We might be a 500 team next yr
Best I could tell Hurley's recruits are pretty much 2 stars but I may have read it wrong.
 
Special duke buyout clause.

Yes, a Duke buyout clause would be an excellent idea. Either they pay us 500 million, or see to it that we are immediately admitted to the ACC.
 
Special duke buyout clause.

Wrong Hurley. Dan played at Seton Hall. Bobby played at Duke and just renewed at Arizona State.
 
Wrong Hurley. Dan played at Seton Hall. Bobby played at Duke and just renewed at Arizona State.

I don't care who the coach is...i still want a duke buyout clause. :)
 
Yes, a Duke buyout clause would be an excellent idea. Either they pay us 500 million, or see to it that we are immediately admitted to the ACC.

I'll trade Hurley getting us back on the right track for 3 years and leaving for Puke if we got an ACC bid.
 
If we’re talking about poaching coaches anyway, Matt Painter should be on that list. Coach at Purdue, has won their conference and conference tourney, and made it to the Sweet 16 multiple times. Really strong winning percentage (over 650%). The only issue with grabbing him is that he’s a Purdue alum so he might not want to leave what is home for him - but he might like coming to a school committed to winning.

The chances of getting Painter to leave his alma mater and the B10 for an AAC job are none and less than none.
 
.-.
Is CB McGrath too raw?

Same with Oltzenberger?

They both have reps as good recruiters though.
 
Because the people running things are a bunch of gutless wonders that don't want to take the blame when things go south. Look at the Ollie situation. Only the people in charge can be blamed. No search firm to deflect the blame.

I thought maybe we learned our lesson on search firms. The candidates are known. Just pick up the damn phone. In fact, the first call is 55.2 miles from Storrs. They complain about money but think nothing of paying a 300k contingency fee to validate the obvious.
 
I thought maybe we learned our lesson on search firms. The candidates are known. Just pick up the damn phone. In fact, the first call is 55.2 miles from Storrs. They complain about money but think nothing of paying a 300k contingency fee to validate the obvious.

Yes, it's not like they give you a money back guarantee if their hired candidate is a flop.
 
I thought maybe we learned our lesson on search firms. The candidates are known. Just pick up the damn phone. In fact, the first call is 55.2 miles from Storrs. They complain about money but think nothing of paying a 300k contingency fee to validate the obvious.

I'm hoping this means the 2 guys i mentioned above are getting more of a look.
 
It's so that when AD Dave or Herbst wants to go somewhere else, the search firm will recommend them

That's how the game is played.
It does, however, also give UConn plausible deniability regarding soliciting currently employed candidates as to any interest they might have without having to worry about being charged with tampering.
 
That's how the game is played.
It does, however, also give UConn plausible deniability regarding soliciting currently employed candidates as to any interest they might have without having to worry about being charged with tampering.

I was gonna ask about this myself.

That seems to be the obvious answer why a non-athletics expert would be solicited for this.
 
.-.
My call on the possible staff if Calhoun happens. Tom Moore, Howie Dickerman, Blaney's kid, and Donyell Marshall as his latest coach in training as his future replacement, but Burrell is possible here as well. I would think that Miller would stay and run the St. Joe's program.

How's this for fun we trade Ollie to OKC for Donovan (essentially Donovan got that job initially in part because KO re-upped at UConn)

Cooley would be a shot across the bow to PU.

And as much as I like the job Hurley has done and his pedigree I'd hate to be the stop-over for the possible replacement for Coach K at hated Duke.
You've got the wrong brother, Danny has no connection to Duke, your thinking of Bobby Hurley.
 
Got to agree somewhat. Rhody came apart on O and went into an iso-hero ball mode down the stretch, but they still moved the ball 100% more than KO offense and also actually work the ball into the interior. Their key big man was completely gassed in the end with no legs. But, their D is tenacious and kept them in a position to win. I did like his use of TOs to keep thins under control at key moments....not something Ollie ever had a feel for.

Remember, they were playing Davidson.
 
Is CB McGrath too raw?

Same with Oltzenberger?

They both have reps as good recruiters though.

Jackrabbits rule. I'll be watching closely as they play this week. They were fun to watch last year.
 
.-.
Please share with us the details of his salary and buyout clause.

I just saw the salary is between $550,000 to $600,000 per year.

not sure on the buyout.
 
You've got the wrong brother, Danny has no connection to Duke, your thinking of Bobby Hurley.
You're right, I thought they both went to Duke at first.
 
The chances of getting Painter to leave his alma mater and the B10 for an AAC job are none and less than none.

I know that’s the tough one... but I don’t know if he’s going to clear the hurdle at Purdue to get to a Final Four. I’m not sure that Purdue as a school is committed to it like we are. So it could be an interesting job for someone with great skills. I also want someone who can coach more broadly than NE. We’re going to need some of these middle of the country people to compete in the AAC. It could also help us come the next round of realignment.

He’s a great coach with none of the baggage some of these others have. He should pop on anyone’s list. Let him tell us he’s not moving. Who wouldn’t want to come in and rebuild one of the best programs in the country?
 
.-.
Yes, he really distinguished himself with the mishandling of the Corey Edsall situation.
That was thrust upon him. AD and UConn has stood behind Corey and the deal they made with REv2.
 
That was thrust upon him. AD and UConn has stood behind Corey and the deal they made with REv2.

Thrust upon him by Randy, yes, but he agreed to it and then absolutely botched everything afterward. They pulled the mysterioso hypothetical with the committee, and then they've got e-mails documenting communications back and forth between him and Edsall regarding suggested startng salary. Yeah, they thought at that point the committee had cleared it based on the hypothetical, but they should have been up front about the whole thing with the committee from the start. That's what pissed off the ethics board and why it turned into a three ring circus. That's on Benedict.

I will say the AD was walking a fine line with Edsall if it were put to him as a deal killer if he couldn't get it done, but I believe that's an unknown.
 
Thrust upon him by Randy, yes, but he agreed to it and then absolutely botched everything afterward. They pulled the mysterioso hypothetical with the committee, and then they've got e-mails documenting communications back and forth between him and Edsall regarding suggested startng salary. Yeah, they thought at that point the committee had cleared it based on the hypothetical, but they should have been up front about the whole thing with the committee from the start. That's what pissed off the ethics board and why it turned into a three ring circus. That's on Benedict.

I will say the AD was walking a fine line with Edsall if it were put to him as a deal killer if he couldn't get it done, but I believe that's an unknown.
You misunderstood me. What was thrust upon AD Dave was the State advisory committee creating two fictions: 1) that the start date was earlier that the stated contractual start date and 2) that Randy manage's Corey even though his contract states otherwise. Without those two "recharactorization" of the actual terms there is no conflict with CT's ethics rules. The rest of what you wrote is moot.

Eventually Corey and UConn will prevail. The university and AD have stood with Randy and Corey, appropriately in my view.
 
UConn is a Blue Blood that fell off the map and happens to be in the AAC. If we get back to a top 10 program, our Blue Blood status will come back. I’m not giving up all our prestige because of a few bad seasons and it would be nice if the rest of our fans didn’t either. UNC and IU were laughing stocks when the the wheels fell off. People questioned if UNC was done as a Blue Blood. Don’t accept the narrative, it’s embarrassing and unfair to Calhoun’s legacy to let it go so easily.

If we get a great coach and go to Final Fours, we are unlikely to lose our coach to another school. They will say he is making Final Fours, partially, because he’s at a Blue Blood like UConn.
 
Last edited:
No matter who we end up hiring if i were preparing the Next Coaches contract it would have massive incentives to reward success with a $0.00 school buyout clause.

Well, then you won't attract anyone good. But at least you'll be able to fire him when he inevitably sucks.
 
Please share with us the details of his salary and buyout clause.

This is all I got, but it's something:

He's extended 5 years at approx $600k. Both Hurley's and Nate's previous contracts had buyouts of half the remainder of the deal. Figure that's a baseline. So at minimum, it's going to be about $1.5m. I'm guessing they bumped it up a bit but idrk.

From what I've read, it sounds like he wants to stay at Buffalo for awhile anyway. Wife has cancer and has been treating in Buffalo, so that's probably a factor.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,339
Messages
4,565,617
Members
10,467
Latest member
Eil Rule


Top Bottom