What I don't get from the "Just hold it crowd" is, then what? UConn had the possession arrow. 10 seconds is a ton of time in a college basketball game. An elite defense like UConn's would swarm him, going for the tie-up if he just held it, which results in the same thing (as a tie-up would effectively be like a turnover) with more time. And you risk being stripped of the ball too. Are players not supposed to use space, move, and use passing angles while advancing?
IMO he actually had the right idea, two Duke players were streaking down court for what would have been the punctuation mark and, at worst, a 1 point win had UConn come back down and buried a 3 as time expired (kind of like what Duke did to make the final score 79-78 in 2004 and I think Kentucky did the same to make it 56-55 in 2011). He had the right idea to advance the ball; it took a freak defensive play from Silas to turn the ball over, but it doesn't change the fact that it is 99% the winning play. Or am I misunderstanding the "hold the ball" crowd, because if what they mean by hold is just to maintain possession, well, duh. I don't think he "made the wrong play", he "poorly executed what should have been the right move 99/100."
Maybe a better basketball mind can explain those ten seconds to me better.
As a side note, he did not lose his team the season; he is the reason they were even way ahead to begin with, and without him, UConn doesn't have the first half woes they did.