I'd definitely vote for UConn over Baylor, and over most others for the ACC. We've gone over the proximity to New York and Boston, supporting ACC presence in NY and a close proximity rival that the BC and UConn fans could get excited about locally in New England. So UConn fits the ACC footprint very well.
Then academically, UConn is top 60 in USN&WR, which fits very well. UConn would be in the middle of the pack within the ACC there. That's a good fit.
Then athletically, the ACC sponsors 25 sports. UConn sponsors varsity teams in 22 of the 25 missing only Men's Lacrosse, Wrestling, and Women's Golf. The athletic department at UConn is healthy and could step into the majority of the sports. It looks like the ACC is going to add Men's & Women's Fencing, which only a handfull sponsor today. It would take the ACC to 27. UConn has ice hockey, and I have to imagine that if the ACC gets a television network, the ACC would strike some kind of deal to show Hockey East games particularly if UConn joins with Notre Dame and Boston College. All are Hockey East.
Football wouldn't be the driver for UConn to the ACC IMO, but it would need to maintain itself as competitive enough to make the games interesting. Some will say that nothing else matters but football. Well not to everyone and certainly not to a conference network. Connecticut has excellent venues for Swimming and Soccer from what I've seen that would fit in very well.
Baylor, on the other hand, is ranked 75 academically. That would work, but it's lower than UConn. And Baylor only sponsors 17 of the ACC's 25 sports. Texas only sponsors 20 of the 25. They should be ashamed with all the money their athletic department makes. That's a lot of missing content for the Long Horn Network.