RedStickHusky
formerly SeoulHuskyFan
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 4,826
- Reaction Score
- 19,639
My first use of ignore. I feel pretty good about it.
Not when you play your home football games.... all of them.... off campus.. in Hartford, CT.
hmnnn... I don't know about this. The lawsuit seemed to imply that Uconn upgraded their football program with ( according to Uconn ) assurances from Miami, Syracuse, BC that they they were committed to the BE. These schools say they never gave Uconn that impression, but Uconn , from their position, seemed to imply that they had such assurance. Ergo, the motivation behind the lawsuit that these 3 schools ( others to follow ) were fraudulent in their intentions in the BE as it related to Uconn.Ah, no.
Les wanted to upgrade because he knew the split was coming between the football schools and non-football schools.
Huh ? Lets not get started on any comparison between Boston and Hartford, ok ? Just don't go there. Its a non starter, ok ? Forget your initiating insults on the City of Boston, as you do not enter such comparisons advantageously, in the least. Not when you play your home football games.... all of them.... off campus.. in Hartford, CT. Both Hartford and Boston are both fine cities, and lets just leave it at that, fair enough ?
Huh ? Lets not get started on any comparison between Boston and Hartford, ok ? Just don't go there. Its a non starter, ok ? Forget your initiating insults on the City of Boston, as you do not enter such comparisons advantageously, in the least. Not when you play your home football games.... all of them.... off campus.. in Hartford, CT. Both Hartford and Boston are both fine cities, and lets just leave it at that, fair enough ?
Incidentally, to this very day, there is no love lost between Perkins & Blumenthal. Blumenthal was blindsided he told me once when he found out in a court depo that Perkins had secretly contacted the ACC ( Swofford has confirming records of the contact ) to get into the ACC. However, Blumenthal was told diferently he said from Perkins himself when he was putting together the lawsuit. Perkins as you know, then skeedattled 2,000 miles away to leave the AD job at Uconn and take the one out in Kansas. Blumenthal told me he might have taken a diffrent strategy had Perkins been more forthcoming with him. But thats Blumenthals side of the story. Perkins simply said " I won't comment on the lawsuit " to me.
hmnnn... I don't know about this. The lawsuit seemed to imply that Uconn upgraded their football program with ( according to Uconn ) assurances from Miami, Syracuse, BC that they they were committed to the BE. These schools say they never gave Uconn that impression, but Uconn , from their position, seemed to imply that they had such assurance. Ergo, the motivation behind the lawsuit that these 3 schools ( others to follow ) were fraudulent in their intentions in the BE as it related to Uconn.
Of course it does BL..it's Yawkey spewing his nonsense on here again..LOLThat makes no sense. The lawsuits was years after UConn committed to upgrade. Your counter argument has absolutely zero to do with the argument you responded to.
Of course it does BL..it's Yawkey spewing his nonsense on here again..LOL
We've suddenly become Rice.
This is absurd. I'm not one of the BC haters here, but one short year ago, UConn went to a bowl game and BC was one of the worst teams in all of FBS. They set the bar for futility in conference games. UConn in 2015 would wipe the floor with the dirty dishrag that was BC football. So your "high horse" is about an inch off the ground. It might be time to step down. Next year, there is no reason to expect that BC will be any better than UConn. We do not acknowledge or accept in any way shape or form the "superiority" of BC football. I am glad to see us playing again because we should be regional rivals. But those games must be either all neutral site or home and home. I would never accept a skewed arrangement with BC, as I might with say, Alabama.
Now, my take on the game has changed. Given that it is clearly a UConn home game, and we get the money and BC gets nothing, and we get most of the tickets, my current take is that the state of BC football in Boston is so bad, that UConn can play a home game on their turf.
How is it possible that the Beagles get absolutely nothing? The home team always pays the visitors something. If the game were played at PAWS-ARF we would have had to pay them something. Has anybody factored that into this supposed huge windfall profit we think we're going to make on this game?
Are you kidding ? Uconn's whole quest in upgrading their football program was to someday replace BC as the dominent college football program in all of New England... and once having attained that benchmark, to outrecruit BC in football, solidify that superior position in Football in N.E., and then branch out from there on the East Coast. Uconn has never beaten BC in football... ever. If Uconn was ever to beat BC in football, it would be a watershed moment for the football program, particularly as it relates to BC, that on the whole has dominated N.E. College football for half a century now. I don't even think the majority of Uconn football fans share your view that beating BC in football at some future day would " not generate plaudits ". Of course it would.
D. Blumenthal did not have a a " client- lawyer " relationship with Perkins, as Perkins had already left for Kansas, the lawsuit was settled by this time, and so Blumenthal felt free to tell me his thoughts. Blumenthal is often criticised, with BC folks for certain, but even within the Uconn fan base for his lawsuit. I can only tell you that from his perspective he acted upon the info he had at the time, and it appears that he found out some things at the deposition and discovery phases, that he wished he knew earlier, as he may have taken a different strategy course. But D. Blumenthal did not violate any client- attorney confidentiality. Dick Blumenthal is smart, saavy, ethical ( imo ) and would not do such a thing. I do not know the man really all that well to say this with 100% certainty, but I do know a few people that have worked with him, including a handful of attorneys, that do know him well. He is political, ( often heard criticism in some quarters with him ) but he protects client confidentiality at all costs.Yes. Because lawyers of Dick Blumenthal's level ignore client-lawyer confidentiality and just tell people bad things about their clients all the time.
You are normally more credible than this.
Good observation.. and was noted by a few other people off this board as well incidentally.There could be a real concern with the FP field. Brown, Dartmouth play on 11-10, UMass Maine on 11-11 and BC UCONN on 11-18. That is three games at Fenway in 9 days.
Are you kidding ? Uconn's whole quest in upgrading their football program was to someday replace BC as the dominent college football program in all of New England... and once having attained that benchmark, to outrecruit BC in football, solidify that superior position in Football in N.E., and then branch out from there on the East Coast. Uconn has never beaten BC in football... ever. If Uconn was ever to beat BC in football, it would be a watershed moment for the football program, particularly as it relates to BC, that on the whole has dominated N.E. College football for half a century now. I don't even think the majority of Uconn football fans share your view that beating BC in football at some future day would " not generate plaudits ". Of course it would.
I don't feel " much pride " about beating Uconn all the time. I really don't. I only get a kick out of beating the Eye Rash. Nothing compares to beating those arrogant prix for me. Most of my family, alum friends just want to see Uconn play BC in a close game these days now, and go from there. I'm on board with that sentiment. Last years shut out rout of Uconn did not even generate a polite golf clap at Alumni among most BC fans in attendance. No juice in the stands at the game at all. Uconn fans at the game will confirm this for you too. BC fans gets no " pride " infusion from beating a team at the bottom of the AAC these days. Me neither. I want to see competitive games... close games.Dominated New England football as the only school playing D1 until UConn upgraded. That's pretty much a trophy for participation if I've ever seen one. And yes you won a few games head to head against that brand new D1 team. The pride you must feel.
Maybe he expressed his remarks more candidly when we met, knowing your antipathy toward BC, and did not share what he told me, with you. Thats possible. The lawsuit by Blumenthal, )whom I also met at a wedding reception in CT and spoke with also on this), also demonstrates quite clearly Uconn's concerns with getting to the level of BC as a major, major driving force for Uconn football's goal and what drove them.
Huh ? Lets not get started on any comparison between Boston and Hartford, ok ? Just don't go there. Its a non starter, ok ? Forget your initiating insults on the City of Boston, as you do not enter such comparisons advantageously, in the least. Not when you play your home football games.... all of them.... off campus.. in Hartford, CT. Both Hartford and Boston are both fine cities, and lets just leave it at that, fair enough ?
So what you're saying is you know everything, everyone, and what? Lived everywhere, as well? We get it, you think you're better than everyone who posts on this board and we should be apologizing 24/7 for daring to breathe the same air as you.
No.. I don't presume to know everything, everyone, etc..Thats a misreading of my comments on this thread.So what you're saying is you know everything, everyone,
D. Blumenthal did not have a a " client- lawyer " relationship with Perkins, as Perkins had already left for Kansas, the lawsuit was settled by this time, and so Blumenthal felt free to tell me his thoughts. Blumenthal is often criticised, with BC folks for certain, but even within the Uconn fan base for his lawsuit. I can only tell you that from his perspective he acted upon the info he had at the time, and it appears that he found out some things at the deposition and discovery phases, that he wished he knew earlier, as he may have taken a different strategy course. But D. Blumenthal did not violate any client- attorney confidentiality. Dick Blumenthal is smart, saavy, ethical ( imo ) and would not do such a thing. I do not know the man really all that well to say this with 100% certainty, but I do know a few people that have worked with him, including a handful of attorneys, that do know him well. He is political, ( often heard criticism in some quarters with him ) but he protects client confidentiality at all costs.
Fan message boards are not where to go to find the typical fans of either BC or Uconn, imo. I really don't know too many BC fans and alums that act like too many of the imbeciles on BC 's fan message boards... plus, I know for a fact a few if them pose as BC alums/ fans there, but are in fact alums and fans of other schools, but post there. Also, to be honest, I know far more Uconn football fans/ alums that are much more civil to me than what I sometimes encounter on here. Fan message boards should not be where you draw your primary impressions of a school's fan base, alum base, imo. The best football fans I've met in away games believe it or not, are in the south. I know thats hard to believe, but thats been my experience the last 50 years of following BC football, anyway. Very hospitable, gracious, most of 'em... even in defeat. ( WVU, the exception )Old money elitists. All BC fans are like that. I've seen the comments sections of some BC Interruption articles, they think public school graduates are literal animals.
No.. I don't presume to know everything, everyone, etc..Thats a misreading of my comments on this thread.
And the problem for you that I live in retirement in Florida ( or anyplace else for that matter ) is what again ?Especially since your arrogant, condescending behind lives in Florida.
Ok... I'll take a break from posting here for awhile, as its clear now, that a few posters are not reading my posts properly it would appear ( I clearly stated above how much I knew Blumenthal, ie " not much " and said as much in my post above). I did speak to them very briefly at separate social gatherings however and relayed my ever so brief conversations with them as a criticism of me as to " what world do I live in "... I made no comments to any intended impressions that I know these people well. Thats a misread of my relationships to either of them, and what I actually said above. ) But I can see things can get a bit testy, so I 'll back off, and leave the board to allow the quarrel and / or discussion among Uconn fans themselves if this game with BC November at Fenway is a good negotiated deal for Uconn or not. Take care Uconn fans.Actually that is an accurate reading of your posts. I mean, you claim to know and have talked to Lew Perkins and Richard Blumenthal. .