Big East TV Deal with FOX, TNT, and NBC | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Big East TV Deal with FOX, TNT, and NBC

Drew said:
They do, that wasn’t what got you to buy it. And you cancelled for 2025 already.
Expand ...
Edited my post to state the Olympics. That was worth it for me. I've got a brain and know what year it is.
 
Peacock is awful. Living in B1G country and had absolutely no idea when any B1G team was playing on Peacock and I know a number of others felt the same, even with the teams they follow. At least flipping channels on TV I'd find a random watchable game on BTN once and a while.

Turner is buying up a lot of stuff with the money they don't have to spend for the NBA so will be interesting how much they put across TNT, TBS, and TRU and not bury stuff on streaming...maybe even people will know TRU exists outside of NCAA opening weekend...

I'll probably feel different about Fox though once they put their streaming games behind a paywall...
 
king conn said:
Putting games on Peacock and Max is a ticket to oblivion

You can get away with this if you are a well established league, sport or national team

The Big East is not that
Expand ...
That's where we are headed for ALL tv/sports. Like it or not (and I'm not saying I like it). I "cut the cord" years ago. The only reason I still have YouTubeTV for live tv is that I want the sports and news channels. I'm paying way too much for that and would love to cancel, but I'm not ready for that yet. My son will watch sports on YTTV, but he doesn't flip around. He puts on a specific game. So sometimes he's on Peacock or ESPN+ for soccer games, sometimes on YTTV. To him, it's all the same. My daughter has never used her YTTV log in. They are going to college next year. I was curious what college kids do for tv. They literally didn't care. They figured they have netflix, MAX, Peacock, etc. and don't care about live tv.

I'd actually be more worried if we were on some crappy network that didn't have a streaming option. I don't know how much we're getting for this deal, but that's more important than where it's televised.
 
.-.
Chuck said:
That's where we are headed for ALL tv/sports. Like it or not (and I'm not saying I like it). I "cut the cord" years ago. The only reason I still have YouTubeTV for live tv is that I want the sports and news channels. I'm paying way too much for that. My son will watch sports on YTTV, but he doesn't flip around. He puts on a specific game. So sometimes he's on Peacock or ESPN+ for soccer games, sometimes on YTTV. To him, it's all the same. My daughter has never used her YTTV log in. They are going to college next year. I was curious what college kids do for tv. They literally didn't care. They figured them have netflix, MAX, Peacock, etc. and don't care about live tv.

I'd actually be more worried if we were on some crappy network that didn't have a streaming option. I don't know how much we're getting for this deal, but that's more important than where it's televised.
Expand ...

Check the TV ratings

The more mainstream, the more eyes are watching

The Big East needs eyeballs for reasons too numerous to mention
 
They're really trying to have us sign up for Venu or whatever it's called huh
 
Only 2 more years to go..;).."So basically the fear is that UConn will jump ship again, but to a P(4) so it has a home for football, and if it does, UConn will have to pay through the nose: $30M if it departs within the first six years, $15M for years seven through nine, and $10M at year 10 and after."
 
My read is that FOX will continue to broadcast most the best games on its main channel and delegate a portion of its FS1 games to Turner. The remaining games - or the ones that aired on FS2 under the old deal - will likely be relegated to streaming. In other words, I'd wait to see how it plays out before buying the streaming service just to see UConn.

(Also, I'm surprised anyone pays the Cincy troll any mind. It'd be one thing if he brought any fresh material, but he doesn't.)
 
gwhuskyfan said:
Peacock on sale right now -- $19.99 for the YEAR. Great price... and you can take advantage of being able to catch all of the Olympic events if that's up your alley
Expand ...
I also find it great for Tour de France. Used to have to record live action during day to watch at night with having to speed through ads. Now can just select either full watch or recap show in the evening both without ads.
 
.-.
king conn said:
Read what I said

To repeat, if you are a well established league, you can get away with it

In addition, they are getting paid probably 10 times what we will get for this
Expand ...
If your point is that more popular things are more popular, well okay. Why does this new arrangement change that in any way?

What is the Big Ten "getting away with" here? Not "getting a ticket to oblivion"? I don't see how having our games on the same networks and streaming platforms as "well established leagues" means we're on the way to death.

It's of course the payout that is the real problem, but that's a separate issue that relates a lot more to football than streaming platforms.
 
kobe said:
the irony of this is hysterical!

our new (power conference) tv deal starting next year is what’s booting the church league off of fox/fs1.

you can’t make this up!
Expand ...
You can't make this up!
Screenshot_20240324_003101_Chrome.jpg
 
navery12 said:
I highly doubt it'll affect UConn men's basketball much at all, we'll be the top draw and I'd be shocked if we're not on FS1 for nearly every game. This is likely replacing the CBSSN games if I had to guess
Expand ...
My prediction is, since we are the big brand, we will be top half of the league in terms of number of games on streaming to drive the subscribers. But in return we will probably get a ton of national FOX games as well.
 
.-.
Drew said:
I’ll say this.. really hope we avoid the “stick most popular team behind a paywall because their fans will pay for it” situation with Max and Peacock. Would really be unfortunate.

Granted, we also get by FAR the best ratings on FOX/FS1, how this shakes out starting in 2025 will be interesting to monitor
Expand ...
You need to remember that the BE contract is for BOTH men's and women's basketball games. And, when games are on TNT, they normally show them on both TNT and MAX. Peacock is becoming more mainstream as they had about 35 Big 10 basketball games on last year as well as the first day of the Big 10 tournament. Nine Big 10 football games will be exclusively on Peacock. All Notre Dame home football games will stream on Peacock with one game exclusively on Peacock. All conferences need a streaming component as part of their media rights.

It's now clear that the holdup with the Big East media contract was the resolution of the NBA TV rights.
 
aburks41 said:
I can stomach it if it means the TV deal is between $12M-$15M per year for UConn. We need the cash. Otherwise it’s a huge middle finger to the fans by Commissioner Val
Expand ...
Is there any indication that is what UConn could get? Would be a massive bump from the current AAV.
 
.-.
auror said:
If your point is that more popular things are more popular, well okay. Why does this new arrangement change that in llarany way?

What is the Big Ten "getting away with" here? Not "getting a ticket to oblivion"? I don't see how having our games on the same networks and streaming platforms as "well established leagues" means we're on the way to death.

It's of course the payout that is the real problem, but that's a separate issue that relates a lot more to football than streaming platforms.
Expand ...

The "new" arrangement should try and use all means to improve popularity. I don't think I am breaking ground here.

Yes, the Big 10 doesn't need to worry about tickets to oblivion. They are the gorilla that has a huge following, along with college fans in general, that will follow them anywhere. The Big East doesn't have that. To get followers of any type, you need exposure.

The Big East is basketball and the payout will be for basketball. You can't separate it because it's not football, that's flat out ridiculous. Our teams survive on this payout. If you are asking the league to hide games on low watched streaming platforms like these, the financial considerations better blow us out of the water. Since we don't know the terms as yet, I will refrain until we see them.
 
king conn said:
The "new" arrangement should try and use all means to improve popularity. I don't think I am breaking ground here.

Yes, the Big 10 doesn't need to worry about tickets to oblivion. They are the gorilla that has a huge following, along with college fans in general, that will follow them anywhere. The Big East doesn't have that. To get followers of any type, you need exposure.

The Big East is basketball and the payout will be for basketball. You can't separate it because it's not football, that's flat out ridiculous. Our teams survive on this payout. If you are asking the league to hide games on low watched streaming platforms like these, the financial considerations better blow us out of the water. Since we don't know the terms as yet, I will refrain until we see them.
Expand ...
You do realize this deal is for BOTH men's and women's basketball? The vast majority of men's basketball games will be on linear TV and in the past TNT has put games on both linear TV and MAX. Peacock is new, but the Big 10 had 35 men's basketball games and will have 9 football games exclusively on Peacock. More and more, sports are going streaming so all conferences have to have some streaming component to prepare. Last year, 17 women's basketball games were on SNY and not easily available to the rest of the country. Maybe some games will be on Peacock or Max which has wider distribution.

I can just imagine the-boneyard back when ESPN started to broadcast Big East games. People would have complained the games weren't on CBS or a local TV channel like Channel 3.
 
GoConn said:
Fanta is on twitter spaces saying that he can't give numbers but Big East schools are going to be happy with the $$$ from the deal.
Expand ...
Big East schools, with their $1 billion endowment funds, will be happy with just about anything from the media deal lmao. What I want to know is will UConn be happy (given the circumstances)
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,181
Messages
4,555,950
Members
10,441
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom