- Joined
- Sep 16, 2015
- Messages
- 310
- Reaction Score
- 1,688
seriously? They got a 200-300% increase? That does bode well for usThe MAC's new deal is $2-2.5 million (up from $800,000) and all they did was add UMass. Seems like a good sign for us.
seriously? They got a 200-300% increase? That does bode well for usThe MAC's new deal is $2-2.5 million (up from $800,000) and all they did was add UMass. Seems like a good sign for us.
Hope not. That would be a disaster for the football program.Hopefully the MAC’s deal includes UConn football
Hope not. That would be a disaster for the football program
We play a higher profile of schools as an independent.It’s better then being independent and making $500,000 a year
Because why would the league want to give its most recognized and respected team more than DePaul? Or Georgetown. I mean they were a big deal 40 years ago. I’m not sure the internet won’t just crash when those 2 giants meet on peacock.Not arrogant. It would be flat out stupid.
What's our leverage?Because why would the league want to give its most recognized and respected team more than DePaul? Or Georgetown. I mean they were a big deal 40 years ago. I’m not sure the internet won’t just crash when those 2 giants meet on peacock.
stupid if we did or stupid if we didnt?Not arrogant. It would be flat out stupid.
Proceeds to argue non-stop for 3 more pages
If someone wants to engage and continue conversation should I ignore them? YESThe thread police shut in again
If someone wants to engage and continue conversation, should I ignore them?
Ask for your permission to continue?
Find something productive to do.
I get that but the school would make more $$$ and they would have access to more bowl games/conference championshipWe play a higher profile of schools as an independent.
I agree.. we would have something to play forI get that but the school would make more $$$ and they would have access to more bowl games/conference championship
Its got all the old wrestling!Peacock gets a bad rap but it has some decent content. Old shows, originals, and sports. Use the app more than some of the other "bigger" named apps.
The MAC's new deal is $2-2.5 million (up from $800,000) and all they did was add UMass. Seems like a good sign for us.
It's clear the football schools are holding the NCAA hostage NOT because football is that much more popular, but because they can.I have no expectations. It's just shocking how much more football is valued than basketball. I look forward to football season more each year, though I am big into basketball, too. It's shocking to see what even mediocre football can bring an athletic program money-wise and viewer-wise over legendary basketball programs.
Remember, there are a ton of non-directional smaller schools like Wayne State, Saginaw State, Grand Valley St, Lake Superior St, Ferris St, UMich Dearborn, Mich Tech, U Mich Flint, Oakland U.That is amazing, since aren't several of the MAC schools on death watch over the next 10 years? How many directional schools does a rapidly aging state like Michigan need?
Yep.It's clear the football schools are holding the NCAA hostage NOT because football is that much more popular, but because they can.
It's the power dynamic.
They've not only forced the NCAA into funding itself exclusively with basketball tournament revenue, but they are taking the money from the men's and women's tournament and using it to pay top football players demanding NIL money from the distant past.
If basketball didn't have to pay the bills for ALL NCAA sports, it would be worth a heckuva lot more.
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma - Wikipedia I believe this is part of the answer to your question...Plus in 1990 CBS signed a $1B/7yr deal for the NCAA Tournament TV rights, and as far as I can tell, the NCAA never owned the Bowls, and there was no playoff so therefore no mega TV rights for the NCAA to sell.Yep.
Why was basketball funding NCAA sports all along? I've never seen anyone do a deep dive on the history of this.
$6,000,000 is just a COLA in 2012 vs 2024 $.’s Anytjing more would be a home run .And what would be deemed a good deal ? Would $6 Million a team, $8 Million a team or $10 Million a team per year be considered a good deal ?
But it's not even "jealous little brother". It's more like annoying little next door neighbor who is too uncoordinated to play sports but sits in the crowd and tries to make fun of everyone on the field through his nightime retainer that he has to wear 24/7I appreciate you @kobe. You really help us appreciate the fact we're fans of a winning team, rather than some school riding the coattails of their significantly more successful conference peers. We don't get many BC, Cuse, or Rutgers fans here anymore, but you help fill the "jealous little brother" void they left.
Exactly what leverage do we have? We just got passed by again in realignment. And everyone knows we would leave for any P4 offer. What is our negotiating stance, "give us more money or we jump to the A10?stupid if we did or stupid if we didnt?
what are the teams that get less revenue gonna do about it? leave for the A10?
But it wouldn’t be stupid to tryExactly what leverage do we have? We just got passed by again in realignment. And everyone knows we would leave for any P4 offer. What is our negotiating stance, "give us more money or we jump to the A10?
Now, if the conference is dumb enough to offer more, of course we take it. Why they would make such and offer is beyond me.
But it wouldn’t be stupid to try
WTF! You’re bringing common sense and rationale thought to the BY!Feels kinda like we should wait for, oh, any details on the actual deal before deciding on how good or bad it really is, but what do I know!