Ugh. She needs to be there. Unless she knows by tonight, knows, not thinks, that it's a done deal. And, if it is a done deal, it should be announced so our partners can plan accordingly.
Forde says UConn is scheduled to attend. So they've been invited.
1. The article said they didn't if she will be there or not - nothing more
2. I think she is operating in the best interest of UConn, as she should
3. She is showing integrity by not hanging up the phone with the ACC and heading off to dinner with the BE. She has admitted a state of flux and she is acting appropriately whether she goes to dinner or not by the statements she has made
4. I'm not concerned about being left out of a merged Big 12 / BE because she does not attend a dinner where there are so many uncertainities that nothing will be accomplished anywhere, besides perhaps a pledge of faith from those with no better options.
yep, get off a plane, quick limo ride, dinner, discussion, quick limo ride, get on plane. Heck it may even take place at JFK.
I would think it would be rude to talk during the dinner, so I assume the logical step would be to hang up the phone first.As to your third point, maybe it would make sense for the University to get her a cell phone then so the choice isn't so stark.
she seems to be the only President that is being transparent.
Question is, if Herbst gets a call from the ACC while in the middle of dinner, does she take it?

I don't think Herbst or McCormick should go. Remember the scene with DeNiro and the baseball bat in Untouchables?Forde says UConn is scheduled to attend. So they've been invited.
What does Herbst do if everyone in the room agrees to the Big 12/ Big East merger and they put down a contact/agreement in which everyone must sign that has a $25MM buyout and you lock in your TV rights for 10 years. If you sign it, you are in the conference. If you don't sign it, then you are not in the conference. Everyone else at the table signs it and it gets to Herbst....what does she do?
Not sure how likely that is....but what the hell does Herbst do in that situation?!
defer to your BOT, or dont bring a lawyer and say your counsel must read the document first.
If Geno and JC are involved I'd say we're gone from the Big East.There was also this report: "According to the source, UConn officials led by Herbst do not see remaining in a weakened Big East as a viable option."
http://www.theuconnblog.com/2011/9/19/2436873/acc-uconn-realignment-big-east-president
If you ask me, she's going to receive a hell of a lot of heat if she ends up going.
On the other hand, WVU will be that girl who just goes to a party and cries and cries about how she just got screwed by two boys that she thought she liked and trying to get sympathy from the other party-goers, only to realize that none of them give a .
No president can make a deal like that without consulting the board of Trustees. Nor would anyone expect them to make such a deal. The other option here is for Herbst to beg off, she already has a meeting with the Governor or the Chairman of the Board of Trustees or some such, and send a high ranking Vice President to represent her. That gets you out of having to make any commitment, since no VP wouild have that authority even if the President did. It isn't an insult to anyone...you can't blow off your BOT chair or the Governor of your state, but it also isn't a full fledged committment. Happens all the time in politics...the Congressman can't meet you but he sends his Cheif of staff (you're getting a fair hearing) or his assistant CoS (you still have a chance) or an intern (you might as well save your breadth, you ain't getting his support).
Sure they can, but Herbst hasn't. At least it hasn't been reported that she has.they can receive authorization beforehand, like UT and OU did yesterday
UConn may not be attending, per this article. Either Herbst has the ACC invitation in the bag, or she is taking a huge risk here.
http://espn.go.com/college-football...st-big-12-talking-possible-merger-sources-say
The article made it appear to be only the football schools were attending. Who is supposedly representing the interest of the bb schools?This meeting is about one thing and one thing only. The football schools need to know what the basketball schools would allow by way of new members so they know if staying in the Big East is a possibility or if they need to leave as a group?
Would the basketball schools allow the addition of the Big XII remnants (assuming Texas and Oklahoma are gone)? If so, that is a possibility. If not, then that alliance would have to be done in the Big XII.
Would the basketball schools allow replacements for Syracuse and Pitt from a list of Temple, UMass, ECU, Memphis and UCF? That's a closer call? I think if UConn is staying, the basketball schools would probably be o.k. with that. They don't worry about their status as a major basketball conference if UConn is still there. If UConn and RU are out, however, it's a closer call -- one that I could see going any way.
This is the purpose of the meeting -- to figure out if the flexibility that the Catholics would allow is sufficient for the football schools to stay, or whether the Big East as a football league is dead.
He doesn't have a big mouth. He's entitled to speculate and is making no illusions otherwise. We have the choice to have big or small ears in deciding if we should take his word as more than anything other than speculation.Boeheim's got a big mouth speculating UConn to the ACC. Just raises everyone's expectations even more and I don't think he knows squat about what is going on.
The article made it appear to be only the football schools were attending. Who is supposedly representing the interest of the bb schools?