- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 7,637
- Reaction Score
- 26,210
DePaul didn’t look as ugly as usual and damn was that a fun ending.
The new coach has them playing with terrific energy. Only four guys returned from last year.
Impressive!
DePaul didn’t look as ugly as usual and damn was that a fun ending.
Honestly, Leitao just wan't that good there. They have some solid players.The new coach has them playing with terrific energy. Only four guys returned from last year.
Impressive!
Theorizing where JRs bulk comes from. Ron Sr was/is tall and thin. But I searched around. Found mom online. She's not big at all. Another athlete actually. So not sure where Jr's bulk comes from. Recessive bulk I guess.Why do you say that?
Not sure Depaul is a bad team this year. They've looked solid with a new coach and they are only playing with 7 scholarship players. Big time tranfer from Oregon (Jalen Terry) & a top 100 recruit have yet to play this season because the NCAA hasn't cleared them yet. Another transer from Kansas (Tyon Grant-Foster) didn't play last night either due to a "medical situation".The big surprise of the night was a solid win by Xavier over tOSU. I am not a Travis Steele fan, but this was a very respectable win by the Musketeers.
Rutgers vs. Depaul could have been a 20 point win by either team and it would not have surprised me. Anything is possible when two bad teams play each other.
Come to think of it, me too!I watched more non-UConn Big East hoop this week than I have non-UConn AAC hoop ever.
Lame?! I wasn't voicing opinion. I made a factual statement.Lame! The pro argument is about the potential of a flagship university in the original Big East footprint.
Remember when UCONN was middling AAC team losing to Wagner and Northeastern. Oh those benefits of a conference upgrade.
Must admit I even rooted for Providence.Come to think of it, me too!
And the best part, aside from Providence, I really enjoyed rooting for the Big East teams!
FIFY: Oh those benefits of aLame! The pro argument is about the potential of a flagship university in the original Big East footprint.
Remember when UCONN was middling AAC team losing to Wagner and Northeastern. Oh those benefits of a conference upgrade.
Why are you so desperate for UMass? Their addition brings nothing we can't have already in OCC if we wanted.Lame! The pro argument is about the potential of a flagship university in the original Big East footprint.
Remember when UCONN was middling AAC team losing to Wagner and Northeastern. Oh those benefits of a conference upgrade.
FIFY: Oh those benefits of aconferencecoaching upgrade.
Why are you so desperate for UMass? Their addition brings nothing we can't have already in OCC if we wanted.
No, it is current value and performance otherwise you are asking us to subsidize them. UMass has none. It is unfortunate for them, but true.Not desperate for their inclusion at all. But when people start talking about adding a 12th team i'll give my opinion just like everyone else. UMASS' untapped potential sure beats the hell out of St Louis or Dayton (good grief). Additions should be based on potential not current rankings.
As long as they end up top 50 NET at the end of the season and we win, it'll be Q1.St. Bonny down 10 to clemson at halftime. would stink if theyre not ranked when we play.
the casual fan likes to see little numbers on the schedule next to the teams we play.As long as they end up top 50 NET at the end of the season and we win, it'll be Q1.
UMASS literally paid for their 15 minutes of fame.UMass' time has come and gone
I have a feeling this year is going to be like 2019-20 in the Big East. Almost every conference game was a quad 1 or 2 game, giving everyone plenty of chances to build their resume. If a team has a winning record in the Big East, they will be getting consideration for a bid.