Why was the loss so puzzling? Kansas has the better overall record and had already beaten Kansas St. by 22 points last month.Kansas St. with a puzzling home loss to Kansas today. KU has climbed up into the utter mediocrity in the middle of the conference.
A lot of oddities in the Big12.Why was the loss so puzzling? Kansas has the better overall record and had already beaten Kansas St. by 22 points last month.
K State had a better conference record. I didn't remember the previous lop sided score between them.Why was the loss so puzzling? Kansas has the better overall record and had already beaten Kansas St. by 22 points last month.
The first half of the Arizona / Houston game was the worst 2 quarters of basketball I have watched in a very long time. Years ago a very elderly ex-coach was hosting (i.e. serving as a local contact for one of the teams participating in an in-season tourney) and commented about the team that "they are nice girls that don't play basketball very good". That described both teams in the first half of the game.Watching Colorado and Utah. Pregame, at the quarter break, and now at halftime they're talking about the postseason prospects for these two teams.
I'm sitting here having watched ASU beat both of these teams and in fact swept Utah. To me it's inconceivable that ASU is not in the conversation. The announcers are talking about quad 1 wins.... Colorado has one and Utah has two. I can't help but thinking ASU has beaten these two teams that have quad one wins.
And while this incessant statistical focus on quad one continues I'm still bedeviled by the fact that a 10 conference loss Mississippi State team gets to dance while a 10 win ASU team doesn't.
This time of year is exquisitely, agonizingly tremendous.
Oh, and down in the dirty t looks like the kitties are going to be able to defend their home court against bottom feeder Houston.
The first half of the Arizona / Houston game was the worst 2 quarters of basketball I have watched in a very long time. Years ago a very elderly ex-coach was hosting (i.e. serving as a local contact for one of the teams participating in an in-season tourney) and commented about the team that "they are nice girls that don't play basketball very good". That described both teams in the first half of the game.
As I have said, Arizona always plays hard and has some individual scoring talent. Teams took and largely hit a lot of free throws, that was a good thing. I think there were somewhere around 8 video reviews which didn't help make the game pleasant.
Incidentally, FWIW, Houston's new coach this season is former Kentucky head guy Mathew Mitchell. I had forgotten, but he retired in 2020 due to on-going issues from a concussion suffered in an accident. He is only in his 50's.
This is the frustration that ACC and Big 12 teams face. Can anyone say, with certainty, that Arizona State, Oklahoma State, Colorado, and Utah or Clemson, Virginia Tech, Syracuse, and UVA are noticeably worse than Illinois, Oregon, Washington, and Nebraska? No, they can't say that. If they say that they can, they're lying. We have metrics that people refuse to use because either they don't fully understand them, don't know how the committee will interpret them, or want to push a narrative.Watching Colorado and Utah. Pregame, at the quarter break, and now at halftime they're talking about the postseason prospects for these two teams.
I'm sitting here having watched ASU beat both of these teams and in fact swept Utah. To me it's inconceivable that ASU is not in the conversation. The announcers are talking about quad 1 wins.... Colorado has one and Utah has two. I can't help but thinking ASU has beaten these two teams that have quad one wins.
Did it? Because they're still well under 0.500 in the conference (and can't get there) and are still 1-10 in Q1 games (which isn't good).The Nebraska win over Washington I think sealed the deal. (Talk about mixed emotions)
What I meant was Nebraska is currently in given their victory over Washington and the Sun Devils are out given their victory over Houston.Did it? Because they're still well under 0.500 in the conference (and can't get there) and are still 1-10 in Q1 games (which isn't good).
Really appreciate this analysis. I largely agree.- Colorado is so similar to ASU it's scary. Both are defense first teams that at times struggle and lack three-point efficiency.This is the frustration that ACC and Big 12 teams face. Can anyone say, with certainty, that Arizona State, Oklahoma State, Colorado, and Utah or Clemson, Virginia Tech, Syracuse, and UVA are noticeably worse than Illinois, Oregon, Washington, and Nebraska? No, they can't say that. If they say that they can, they're lying. We have metrics that people refuse to use because either they don't fully understand them, don't know how the committee will interpret them, or want to push a narrative.
Also, the sensationalism generated around a single "big win" has to stop. I still remember when Mississippi State beat LSU (the defending champs) and everyone and their mamas thought that they'd sealed their tournament fate (that they were in no matter what). They made the WBIT, largely because they slumped hard after that one data point. Colorado's win over Texas Tech on Saturday was nice, but now we see a Q2 loss to a reeling Utah team. So they're still on the bubble because they negated a nice Q2 win over TT with that mess against Utah. The Clemson (Duke) and Virginia (@ Louisville) wins are the talk of the town right now, but they won't mean much if those teams don't win out (and I would be surprised if Clemson wins out because they're making their California trip, and only four teams in two seasons have swept the California teams in California: UNC last year and Duke, Louisville, and Virginia Tech this year).
Nebraska just snapped a six-game losing streak in February. They're "in" because people are overreacting to a one-point win over a Washington team that is okay. I can't imagine that a team being five games UNDER 0.500 and coming off a 6-game losing streak (with at least four of those games being blowouts) will have its entire fortunes decided by a one-point win over a team that most bubble teams could beat. Stanford beat Washington and isn't likely to go dancing this season because they took a pounding in the ACC (the conference that everyone likes to dump on).What I meant was Nebraska is currently in given their victory over Washington and the Sun Devils are out given their victory over Houston.
I do have my fingers crossed that someone in the committee will have some sense of perspective and look holistically at the Sun Devils. I also understand the vast limitations of Charlie Creme and the futility of looking at bracketology tea leaves before the conference tournaments.
What's that said and listening to the noise out there at this point it would appear is Nebraska is in an ASU is out. It is certainly my hope that Nebraska gets to stay in as a Husker fan but it is my dream that the Sun Devils dance with Molly this year
Having gone through this dark Valley of despair for 3 years I feel your pain.The Big 12 is beyond predicting. In TCU I trust, except when I don't. Arizona losing is the only relative constant.