SCGamecock
Carolina Sandlapper
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2015
- Messages
- 3,205
- Reaction Score
- 11,928
and now a feel good moment for those of you that think Baylor's WBB team are just a bunch of tough girls:
LOVE this. Special.
and now a feel good moment for those of you that think Baylor's WBB team are just a bunch of tough girls:
Well we lost Pat (RIP) to that terrible disease. We still have Geno , Dawn & Muffet-must be a Philly thing -they will scrap with anyone, anywhere ...... Texas had a brutal OC schedule last year so throw in Karen Aston. UCLA's Cori Close really seems to get it and is willing. Scott Rueck at Oregon St. seems willing but without the horses. As much as it pains me to say it Holly and TN are also among the willing. This coalition of the willing is not enough, especially when you have teams like Duke, Baylor, Maryland & Stanford with perennially top 10 recruiting classes that are among the unwilling.Whatever happened to "anyone, anywhere , anytime"
and now a feel good moment for those of you that think Baylor's WBB team are just a bunch of tough girls:

Well stated, although I might refer to Stanford as "almost willing," as the Cardinal will play just about anyone not named UConn.Well we lost Pat (RIP) to that terrible disease. We still have Geno , Dawn & Muffet-must be a Philly thing -they will scrap with anyone, anywhere . Texas had a brutal OC schedule last year so throw in Karen Aston. UCLA's Cori Close really seems to get it and is willing. Scott Rueck at Oregon St. seems willing but without the horses. As much as it pains me to say it Holly and TN are also among the willing. This coalition of the willing is not enough, especially when you have teams like Duke, Baylor, Maryland & Stanford with perennially top 10 recruiting classes that are among the unwilling.
Well stated, although I might refer to Stanford as "almost willing," as the Cardinal will play just about anyone not named UConn.
And you know, neighbor, it's not about the wins as much as it is about the championships.That's kind of funny but I can't imagine that she really thinks this. Geno is 991-135 - .880 winning %. Kim is at 506-96 - .841%.
The fastest coach to reach 600 wins is Nancy Fahey, current head coach of the Illinois Fighting Illini, who reached the mark in her 706th game as coach of the Division III Washington (MO) Bears. Nancy was 600-106. Kim would have to go 94-10 over the next 3 years or so - certainly possible, but not likely as I would expect 3-4 losses each year plus another one in the NCAA's.
I don't think any coach will come close to Geno's all time winning %. Kim, for example, would need to go 485-39 over the next 14 years averaging less than 3 losses per year during that time frame. Highly unlikely...
Only the second most notable Italian EF behind Enzo Ferrari--who also knew a thing or two about energy, heat, and light--and was much more fun at parties.I don't know that it would be a wise move for a player to quote Einstein to Geno. If you have the temerity to quote any physicist to Geno, at least quote an Italian like Enrico Fermi.
Doesn't Danger get the keys to the Ferrari this year?Only the second most notable Italian EF behind Enzo Ferrari--who also knew a thing or two about energy, heat, and light--and was much more fun at parties.

Sonny -
Please read what you wrote on CHOICES.
"In life you are defined by not by your abilities, but by your choices. Neither Baylor nor UCONN has a choice of conference opponents. UCONN WCBB isn't in the AAC by choice either."
Convoluted sentence ??leading your paragraph ---led to my believing you said the reverse of what you intended??-- sorry every time I read it comes out the same way- did you mean-YOU ARE DEFINED BY YOUR CHOICES. YES!
I replied: If everyone was only defined by their choices--we'd have no hero's or leaders' TRUISM!
I write many convoluted sentences--and try to not get angry when someone reads them as written.
- but with my response --I didn't expect anyone to take your tact--on a truism.
If you wrote that in the manner it was written you'd get my response again --you'd get the same response.
Adding now: EVERY person who ever lived on this or any other planet--at times makes BAD Choices.
Argue -a truism ---