As an objective fan, I would say OK had more than luck. They played hard, made some big threes, and got some key rebounds. I think they’re in trouble when Brown comes back, though.OU was lucky for two things. Foul trouble and cold shooting.
As an objective fan, I would say OK had more than luck. They played hard, made some big threes, and got some big rebounds. I think they’re in trouble when Brown comes back, though.
The swinging of elbows above shoulder height was a point of emphasis last year so refs are still pretty aware of them. That wasn’t luck on the part of OK either.
Not trying to be argumentative but OK took the shots that Baylor allowed and to their credit, they made them. When Baylor changed up the defense, OK didn’t get those shots.It was luck that it has happened. Kalani has only really been in foul trouble once. OK is not as good on daily basis that they are playing. They were shooting well above what they typically do. Notice the 2-12 shooting to close out the half. That is OK shooting on a daily basis. Not saying they aren't playing well, but let's be real if Baylor was shooting well like they do on the regular it would be a little different score.
Not trying to be argumentative but OK took the shots that Baylor allowed and to their credit, they made them. When Baylor changed up the defense, OK didn’t get those shots.
I would think you’d prefer to beat a good team than a bad one but I guess you guys are rivals?
Not trying to be argumentative but OK took the shots that Baylor allowed and to their credit, they made them. When Baylor changed up the defense, OK didn’t get those shots.
Oklahoma shot 40.3% against UConn and are making 44.1% this season so I don’t think they’re nearly as bad as you believe.
I would think you’d prefer to beat a good team than a bad one but I guess you guys are rivals?
Natalie Chou is a heck of a shooter
I was going to mention her demeanor -very calmAnd she plays very much in control. Very calm.