B1G | Page 106 | The Boneyard

B1G

Status
Not open for further replies.

pj

Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
8,614
Reaction Score
25,035
IF UMass were to get into the Big Ten, it would be much bigger than UConn getting into the Big East in 1979, but I certainly wouldn't waste time worrying about it if I were you, because that is never happening.

Congress at the Commonwealth level do not support UMass like the State of CT supports UConn. Western Massachusetts might as well be Nebraska or Iowa in the their eyes. On top of the fact that UMass football is only Division 1A by the slimmest of margins. Their own administration does not support football and if the citizenry immediately surrounding the University does not care enough to get a Conference Tournament basketball game in which the institution is a direct participant on TV, exactly how many TV sets does The Big Ten gain?

Massachusetts is like New Jersey, the politicians look at in-state institutions as treasure chests to raid for their friends and family. They put Billy Bulger in charge of the UMass system because he was so good at transferring money to the politicos. But the politicians wake up when an out-of-state entity like the B1G offers to transfer $45 mn a year or so of money into the state. They'll put aside their chiselling for a year or two to make that happen, in hope of supporting a few children and grandchildren off the revenue a decade later.

So New Jersey made Rutgers-to-the-B1G happen, and Massachusetts would be supportive of UMass-to-the-B1G. But the B1G doesn't need two schools in New England, the population base is centralized enough that UConn is within 2 hours of 90% of New England. And UConn is clearly superior to UMass.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,511
Reaction Score
19,487
Your right. I don't know what I was thinking. No doubt that an 11-0 UMass or BC team playing 11-0 Ohio State would leave Gillette
stadium empty but for a few winos and not one of the 14 million televisions sets in New England would be turn on to watch.
In fact all 14 million sets will turned and tuned into a a session of the Congress of the Commonwealth.

I don't know what you are thinking either. Those are some pretty far-out-there hypotheticals.

Since Don Brown, UMass is 21-48 vs. both FCS and FBS competition, with only 5 wins vs. the latter. They have never gone undefeated in their history and have a .502 winning percentage. They are not even close to the Big Ten model. Their home stadium is almost 2 hours away and they averaged 15,000 fans in 2013.

But besides that, UMass is in great shape to meet your criteria for inclusion to the Big Ten.:rolleyes:
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,511
Reaction Score
19,487
Massachusetts is like New Jersey, the politicians look at in-state institutions as treasure chests to raid for their friends and family. They put Billy Bulger in charge of the UMass system because he was so good at transferring money to the politicos. But the politicians wake up when an out-of-state entity like the B1G offers to transfer $45 mn a year or so of money into the state. They'll put aside their chiselling for a year or two to make that happen, in hope of supporting a few children and grandchildren off the revenue a decade later.

So New Jersey made Rutgers-to-the-B1G happen, and Massachusetts would be supportive of UMass-to-the-B1G. But the B1G doesn't need two schools in New England, the population base is centralized enough that UConn is within 2 hours of 90% of New England. And UConn is clearly superior to UMass.

The ground work needs to be laid now...at least in process. That is not the case in Western Massachusetts.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
7,188
Reaction Score
8,765
The Peak of 495 is not Worcester. It is Marlboro/Northborough/Westborough, 10 minutes east of Worcester.

I know; but, the MBTA goes to Worcester. Thus, most Bostonians, not all, reluctantly acknowledge that Worcester is part of Massachusetts.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,459
Reaction Score
4,612
So UCONN in the B1G would be the best outcome.
I don't know about logistical nightmare. Boston can handle it.
When UConn gets to the B1G in 2026, then that will be the end of BC's terrific reputation as New England's team. Boneyarders should not be glorifying BC by saying how wonderful it would be for UConn to play them now or ever. They do not benefit UConn in any way. They are basically an afterthought now, but without a rivalry partner in New England, eventually they will fade away. People are not going to flock to Boston to see them play North Carolina, Virginia, Duke, or FSU in football. UConn's rivals in 2026 will be Rutgers, Michigan, Wisconsin, Penn State, etc. BCU will be a tune up game, if anything and I would make them pay UConn to play them. I only hope that I live long enough to see that day.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,511
Reaction Score
19,487
I know; but, the MBTA goes to Worcester. Thus, most Bostonians, not all, reluctantly acknowledge that Worcester is part of Massachusetts.
The commuter line. Sort of like saying that Milford, CT is part of New York City.:)

P.S. I get what you mean. Just giving you . I grew up around there.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
819
Reaction Score
1,528
The world according to Boston
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    52.4 KB · Views: 144

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,935
Reaction Score
208,637
Joined
Dec 23, 2014
Messages
9
Reaction Score
46
NE can't support two top FB programs. Fortunately for us, NE currently doesn't have one.

NJ pop. 9 M
PA pop. 13 M
NE pop. 14 M

Remove the outskirts of ME, NH, and VT, factor in the relative lack of CFB fans and you have space for exactly one flagship program. That would be us.

So, it's a no brainer to add UConn, but a fool's errand to take another. Only BC as a Pitt to our Penn State would make any sense. And we know the B1G has no interest in schools like Pitt.
So let's just make it UConn and Kansas and call it a conference.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,935
Reaction Score
208,637
Massachusetts is like New Jersey, the politicians look at in-state institutions as treasure chests to raid for their friends and family. They put Billy Bulger in charge of the UMass system because he was so good at transferring money to the politicos. But the politicians wake up when an out-of-state entity like the B1G offers to transfer $45 mn a year or so of money into the state. They'll put aside their chiselling for a year or two to make that happen, in hope of supporting a few children and grandchildren off the revenue a decade later.

So New Jersey made Rutgers-to-the-B1G happen, and Massachusetts would be supportive of UMass-to-the-B1G. But the B1G doesn't need two schools in New England, the population base is centralized enough that UConn is within 2 hours of 90% of New England. And UConn is clearly superior to UMass.
pencil-choosing-disagree-5552958.jpg

The NJ legislature supports the state U, not like UConn but it does. The UMass legislature seems contemptuous of Amherst, at least it terms of their unwillingness to invest in it.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
7,188
Reaction Score
8,765
pencil-choosing-disagree-5552958.jpg

The NJ legislature supports the state U, not like UConn but it does. The UMass legislature seems contemptuous of Amherst, at least it terms of their unwillingness to invest in it.

Most of Beacon Hill does not even know that UMass Amherst is even in the Commonwealt of Massachusetts. They just did pass a $1 Billion funding package; but, that is for the entire UMass system and a lot is going to UMass Lowell, whose President is very well connected politically, and UMass Boston, which is building its first on-campus residential complex that will serve as the athlete's village for the proposed 2024 Boston Olympics. Massachusetts is basically setting itself up to have a mini SUNY with several university hubs (Amherst, Lowell, Boston, Worcester/Medical) instead of a large, single flagship.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,321
Reaction Score
46,496
Most of Beacon Hill does not even know that UMass Amherst is even in the Commonwealt of Massachusetts. They just did pass a $1 Billion funding package; but, that is for the entire UMass system and a lot is going to UMass Lowell, whose President is very well connected politically, and UMass Boston, which is building its first on-campus residential complex that will serve as the athlete's village for the proposed 2024 Boston Olympics. Massachusetts is basically setting itself up to have a mini SUNY with several university hubs (Amherst, Lowell, Boston, Worcester/Medical) instead of a large, single flagship.

That's going to be near impossible to accomplish. You're talking about a state with 6 million residents. 50k students to go around. I can see 2 schools in that set becoming research universities, but definitely not more than that. Just not enough students to go around.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
7,188
Reaction Score
8,765
That's going to be near impossible to accomplish. You're talking about a state with 6 million residents. 50k students to go around. I can see 2 schools in that set becoming research universities, but definitely not more than that. Just not enough students to go around.

Agree, was staying a SUNY like system in terms of structure, i.e. no central flagship university. I can see UMass Lowell approaching UMass Amherst in terms of research dollars and UMass Boston approaching UMass Amherst in enrollment numbers simply because it is based in Boston and its a heck of a lot cheaper than the other universities in the area (Harvard, MIT, BU, BC, Northeastern, Suffolk, Emerson, etc.)
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,321
Reaction Score
46,496
Agree, was staying a SUNY like system in terms of structure, i.e. no central flagship university. I can see UMass Lowell approaching UMass Amherst in terms of research dollars and UMass Boston approaching UMass Amherst in enrollment numbers simply because it is based in Boston and its a heck of a lot cheaper than the other universities in the area (Harvard, MIT, BU, BC, Northeastern, Suffolk, Emerson, etc.)

UMass's advantage of course is that it has space, which UMass-Boston can't build into. A lot of schools that are already built have huge advantages.

When you look at a school like SUNY-Buffalo, for instance, it's double the size of a Binghamton, and it has 6x as much research funding as Stony Brook. It was built in a hideous swamp during the late 60s, early 70s. There is still a ton of space to build it downtown, but the move is absolutely prohibitive. This goes to show how unlikely if not impossible it is to build a research center from scratch.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
4,616
Reaction Score
13,770
Someone please tell me we will find a way to rent the suite right next to the B1G's for today's games. Herbst can tell Delany she is reviewing the B1G product in case we are interested some day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
738
Guests online
3,525
Total visitors
4,263

Forum statistics

Threads
156,968
Messages
4,074,431
Members
9,962
Latest member
Boatbro


Top Bottom