Yes. It will cut down on the turnovers and add more offenseI def expect her to carry some of the PG load. As she did before she got injured.
Yes. It will cut down on the turnovers and add more offenseI def expect her to carry some of the PG load. As she did before she got injured.
I'm with you about Azzi, oldhuskie, and your overall post, and I'm certainly sorry to see Caroline struggle so much during the St. John's game.Yes she is back, but if it is this year's version of Caroline vs. lasts year's it may not make enough of a difference. Remember she was a pretty mediocre player before the concussion this year, apparently having more challenges recovering from the offseason hip surgery than we thought.

I imagine that hypothetically, an athlete can look out for his or her own best interest if they have a good NIL package. Yes the scholarship money helps, but the athlete may not feel like they are at the mercy of the coach anymore (again, assuming the NIL package is good enough).I am impressed with the fact that Azzi felt comfortable telling her coach that "I'll be ready when I'm ready." I have to believe that there are a lot of programs where a player would feel that she was taking her scholarship in her hands if she said something like that to her head coach.
A 100 percent Azzi next season is better than an ???? Azzi now.
Personally, I think most of it is mental fatigue! They have basically spent most of the season playing in games where, not only do they know there’s no help, but also knowing that if even one of them gets in serious foul trouble or, even worse, fouls out, that is a loss! Couple that with the physical fatigue of facing increased physical play from teams that are attacking an obvious weakness (as they should) and you have what we are seeing on court. It’s one thing to be pushed to your limits physically. Most top athletes in really good shape can deal with that but when you start adding all this mental stress and worry it can become too much for anyone.You misunderstand the fatigue problem completely. It’s not the minutes tiring them out. It’s the insane travel schedule paired with close and hard games due to our best players being injured.
I have no idea IF or WHEN Azzi will return. As I mentioned in an earlier thread, I don't look for, or anticipate when Azzi will return. She'll be back when I see her on the court in a game. I'm only concerned about the players that dress. THOSE are the players that will help us win games.It’s just basketball, not life or death. Maybe it will be good for the team to get knock out of the tournament early, get an extended vacation and some rest before next season. The team will come back motivated, realizing that making the final four isn’t a given and requires a lot of hard work.


According to the best shooter on the planet, Fudd is the third best shooter on the planet. Do you think Connecticut couldn't score eight more points with Fudd than without?Well, that's interesting thinking. However, you are assuming that each of those eight points would be replacing missed baskets and that's not realistic!
I agree with your statement. If Fudd only scored 8 points in our last two losses, we would of won those games, and we would of beaten South Carolina too.According to the best shooter on the planet, Fudd is the third best shooter on the planet. Do you think Connecticut couldn't score eight more points with Fudd than without?
Is there any evidence whatsoever that Geno...now, intends to give any meaningful minutes to the last named three?
When his philosophy in important games has always been to shorten the roster rather than expand...
I previously noted the NCAA's of 2011 where he played one sub, Lorin Dixon, had two youngsters on the bench...Laura Englen and Michala Johnson, neither of whom got off the bench until the last minute, not dissimilar to his methodology of this season.
What I neglected to mention in that post is that both of those young woman
went on to respectable college careers (in other programs)...not necessarily all-stars, but at least competent, useful performers.
Would not a few competent, useful performers be of great use, this season?
_____________
Edit: I mistakenly forgot that Heather Buck was also on that squad and played 5 minutes: sorry
Your definition of "competent useful performers" is completely different than "Championship competent, useful performers." How many times have you seen transfers that were "competent, useful performers" flop when they go to other bigger/more successful schools?Is there any evidence whatsoever that Geno...now, intends to give any meaningful minutes to the last named three?
When his philosophy in important games has always been to shorten the roster rather than expand...
I previously noted the NCAA's of 2011 where he played one sub, Lorin Dixon, had two youngsters on the bench...Laura Englen and Michala Johnson, neither of whom got off the bench until the last minute, not dissimilar to his methodology of this season.
What I neglected to mention in that post is that both of those young woman
went on to respectable college careers (in other programs)...not necessarily all-stars, but at least competent, useful performers.
Would not a few competent, useful performers be of great use, this season?
_____________
Edit: I mistakenly forgot that Heather Buck was also on that squad and played 5 minutes: sorry
You are missing the point entirely! And, you are now changing the scenario of your story. Now you are questioning if UConn couldn't score eight more points with Fudd than without her? That clearly wasn't your original statement. Regardless, Fudd would replace someone in the lineup. That someone (most likely Griffin) would have at least some scoring production. So if Fudd scored eight points, you would have to subtract the points that would have been scored by the player she replaced.According to the best shooter on the planet, Fudd is the third best shooter on the planet. Do you think Connecticut couldn't score eight more points with Fudd than without?
YESShould the coaching staff consider having Azzi wear a significant knee brace while she begins to workout and play
No. The coaching staff is not qualified to make that decision. Only Azzi’s MD, who is cognizant of her injury and if a brace would suitable for that injury can make that decision.Should the coaching staff consider having Azzi wear a significant knee brace while she begins to workout and play
My concern is if Azzi comes back that she will be forced to do way to much with the ball in her hands just to get a shot off. Again we don’t have a PG that can create open shots for other guards in a half court by attacking and kicking it out. Just look at what Lou has to go thru to get an open look do we really want Azzi to go thru the same gauntlet. IMO Azzi just needs to shut it down this year and come back physically and mentally healthy with PB and KK breaking down defenses next year.
Don’t forget this young woman. There will be quality depth at guard next year.My concern is if Azzi comes back that she will be forced to do way to much with the ball in her hands just to get a shot off. Again we don’t have a PG that can create open shots for other guards in a half court by attacking and kicking it out. Just look at what Lou has to go thru to get an open look do we really want Azzi to go thru the same gauntlet. IMO Azzi just needs to shut it down this year and come back physically and mentally healthy with PB and KK breaking down defenses next year.
Good enough for me -
Don’t forget this young woman. There will be quality depth at guard next year.
Good enough for me -
I'm not sure how to say this w/o being offensive...Don’t forget this young woman. There will be quality depth at guard next year.
Geno never said she said that. It’s a misquote.This is likely to get a lot of thumbs done. First let me say we don't know anything about the situation with Azzi. We don't know if she's having any pain, how she feels after a workout, etc. There has to be a good reason why she is not playing.
But, if I was on a team that was really struggling and our star player said "I'll be ready when I'm ready" that would diminish that person in my eyes. Hopefully that statement was taken out of context or just poorly worded. Also hopefully the other players, who do know something about the situation agree with Azzi and are not miffed that she isn't playing. I have to assume that is the case.
I'm guessing that she was referring to available guard depth.I'm not sure how to say this w/o being offensive...
Are we sure we don't have (at least pretty good) depth at guard, this year?
So was II'm guessing that she was referring to available guard depth.
She was sick not injured, there's a difference.Remember Azzi in the NC game.? ................ We are there again...... Wait until next season!!! She'll be ready then!!
Your definition of "competent useful performers" is completely different than "Championship competent, useful performers." How many times have you seen transfers that were "competent, useful performers" flop when they go to other bigger/more successful schools?
A player that is a scorer for example may be pretty good at a school that is elated to just get into the NCAA, and/or maybe win a round. In comparison vs a team with title aspirations projected to lose maximum two games a year, if that. Then this scorer who is not as good as other scorers on the elite team has to be productive in other things such as becoming a better passer or defender or rebounder etc. What if she can't? You are going to play her anyway? So yeah these great kids went on to other schools but it doesn't mean that they would then have been a success/competent at UCONN vs their other teammates. At a school that doesn't win nearly as much that player can have several games in which she goes 5-14 vs other non-title contending teams. Prior to UCONN's rash of injuries, that has been/is rarely the case at UCONN.
? The OP said that if Azzi played and provided 8 points per game (extremely likely) we would have won four out of five of our losses. How is that wrong? You say she would be replacing another players points but she Azzi would be coming off the bench ( for a while, at least) so that doesn’t make much sense. According to that reasoning, you could/should never be able to play anyone unless the bench player were better than the starter!You are missing the point entirely! And, you are now changing the scenario of your story. Now you are questioning if UConn couldn't score eight more points with Fudd than without her? That clearly wasn't your original statement. Regardless, Fudd would replace someone in the lineup. That someone (most likely Griffin) would have at least some scoring production. So if Fudd scored eight points, you would have to subtract the points that would have been scored by the player she replaced.
We have fabulous guards, two of whom have been on the bench injured and one who’s a freshman adjusting to college, a new country, and the demands of a top Division I team. I was responding to someone’s comment about next year’s guards. Heaven forbid someone is sick or injured, there will be more guards to play to see who “has it” today. Right now, everyone needs to be excellent all the time - it’s exhaustingI'm not sure how to say this w/o being offensive...
Are we sure we don't have (at least pretty good) depth at guard, this year?