Last I heard, it isn't a competition.
What about "extreme sports" like skateboarding, BMX, motocross, inline, etc.?
Why can't competitive dance be considered a sport? Why can't competitive dancers be considered athletes? Have you seen what some of those crazy breakdancers can do?So for you Dancing with the Stars is a sport.
Why can't competitive dance be considered a sport? Why can't competitive dancers be considered athletes? Have you seen what some of those crazy breakdancers can do?
Let's try to work towards one (or start a whole new debate, depending on your answer)
Would you say that those who play sports (however you choose to define "sport") are automatically athletes?
Ah, but Brady and CC do essentially specialize in one area (in their respective sports)! In fact, that specialization is what, in my opinion, makes football the greatest, truest team sport in existence!In technicality, yes. But when I think of an "athlete" I think of somebody who posseses the physical traits that define the term "athlete". As we've pointed out in this thread, there are many professinal athletes who have beer bellies but are able to play sports at the highest level because their positions do not require them to maintain top cardiovascular condition.
Tom Brady is obviously one of the best athletes in the world, but he's not an athlete in the same sense that Michael Vick is an athlete. Some people are able to play professional sports because they have one characteristic that sets them apart from the rest of the field. In the case of Tom Brady, it's the ability to read a defense and deliver a football with precision and velocity in the process of being hammered by three 250 pound men. That's an admirable skill, one that has made him famous. While he has to keep himself in adequate physiccal condition, I doubt he has the type of flexibility, speed, leaping ability, strength, hand-eye coordination, or agility you'd like to see in a prototypical world class athlete.
I don't have the nerve to say Tom Brady or CC Sabathia is not an athlete, because they obviously are in a fundamental sense. But to me, a truly remarkable athlete is a freak of nature, somebody like LeBron James who posseses several of the traits I listed above, and does not simply specialize in one area.
So having physical gifts that you only dream of isn't enough if they don't run in the game they are playing? Hand-eye coordination not important? Mental toughness overrated?
That's in case the offensive coordinatator wants to call a play and discuss how the pins are aligned defensively.I was on board with you on bowlers being athletes until a couple of years ago when I saw a guy bowling in the championship game with a cellphone attached to his belt.
I guess all the alpine skiing events; downhill, slalom, and ski jumping; are all no longer sports, either....
I've looked up formal definitions of (sport) (hobby) (athlete). Do you have to sweat? Must you keep score? This whole argument was focused on the Question.......is a Bowler an athlete?
So are the following Athletes by your standards? WHY???
1. a bowler
2. a golfer
3. a ping pong player
4. a dart player
5. a bocce baller
6. a jockey
7. a Nascar driver
8. a competitive Eater
9. an arm wrestler
10. a cheerleader
We've pretty much already established that relative required physical exertion is not the way to determine if an activity is a sport. If it was, and I assume you would wager that a sport requires some kind of elite physical skill in strength, endurance and/or precision, then one could argue that elite death metal drumming would be not only a sport, but one of the most difficult.I could still compete in these events and not get tired
Sailing? Archery?
You mean facial contortions and mental gymnastics don't count?So I guess ESPN thinks spelling is a sport
Sure. Why not?You mean facial contortions and mental gymnastics don't count?
No, I mean ESPN must consider it some kind of sport if they're featuring all this stuff about it all day.