- Joined
- Dec 6, 2014
- Messages
- 1,178
- Reaction Score
- 4,510
NOOOOO!That is a name that keeps popping up.
NOOOOO!That is a name that keeps popping up.
Why would Geno do anything to "exclude" Jen? This makes it sound like he wouldn't want to hire her. The job description has nothing whatsoever to do with Jen Rizzotti.I believe that the 2 P5 requirement was put in to exclude some candidates including Rizzotti. For Rizzotti, 1 P5 would have sufficed. So there must be someone else Geno wanted to exclude.
If Geno wanted to hire Rizzotti for this post, he would not put any P5 requirement in.Why would Geno do anything to "exclude" Jen? This makes it sound like he wouldn't want to hire her. The job description has nothing whatsoever to do with Jen Rizzotti.
Jen is not a candidate for the job. She does not want the job. The job description has nothing to do with Jen. She does not need to be excluded.If Geno wanted to hire Rizzotti for this post, he would not put any P5 requirement in.
I do not know the reason why. You have to ask him.
I agree. This job posting has minimum and desired qualifications. Not everyone who applies for the job meet either or both, and not everyone who applies that do meet either/both are going to get either an interview or the job. If the posting was written for one or more people in which they are interested, it may be both legalese and the whole wheat and chaff situation.I don't think it was written to exclude anyone. I think it was tailored to precisely match the person they intend to hire, and was only posted because they had to by rule.
I agree with you. Rizzotti may not want this job and the 2 P5 was not meant to exclude her.Jen is not a candidate for the job. She does not want the job. The job description has nothing to do with Jen. She does not need to be excluded.
Jen is not a candidate for the job. She does not want the job. The job description has nothing to do with Jen. She does not need to be excluded.
I have had decades of dealing with CT State Human Resource rules and policies. They would call their policy inclusive but it could also be seen as exclusionary.I don't think it was written to exclude anyone. I think it was tailored to precisely match the person they intend to hire, and was only posted because they had to by rule.
sorry..............couldn't resist.................what are the odds that any ND coach would even consider working for UConn? I can't even imagine the backlash from ND fans..........Glad you and @UcMiami got a chuckle on this one ; however, neither Niele or Muffet would qualify. Both have only coached at one P5 conference.
If you wanted a Domer coach, there is one in South Bend that qualifies: Coquese Washington (HC in B1G (Penn State), Asst. coach in ACC (ND, two stints), Big12 (Oklahoma)). The jury is largely still out on Round 2 of her stays in ND (primarily because she was hired during and performed during a pandemic).
If the “right” person comes along, then any of the job posting qualifications will simplify be waved to hire her.
I agree with others that think the job listing was posted to meet state requirements and that the best available person has already been selected..........just waiting for the announcement any day now......
I believe that Sheri came directly from coaching high school to college and was recommended by Geno to the OK AD.I actually went through every post of this thread. This is very entertaining. It looks like the stage has been set and this pick is filled with lots of DRAMA! Who could this be?
Muffet McGraw, Kim Mulkey, Rick Pitino, ...Brenda Freese, Dawn Staley.......Gail Gostinkers,........Sheri Coale, ...Trumpets please.......the pick is.........(fill in the blanks).
If I were a betting man, my money would be on MorganI hope that it is Morgan Valley, just watched a Youtube video "Who is Morgan Valley part 1". She talks about getting into coaching, practicing against BT and DT, originally wanting to go to Tennessee and adversity. Impressive and great insight into the program.
Question for you. IYO, if GA decides he's had enough and retires, is there any possibility that CD would like to take the job to cap off her career as a HC?Jen is not a candidate for the job. She does not want the job. The job description has nothing to do with Jen. She does not need to be excluded.
one scenario is having CD take over for a few years and having a younger coach brought in to be groomed.........of course if Diana Taurasi or Sue Bird had an interest that would be a possibility too.....Question for you. IYO, if GA decides he's had enough and retires, is there any possibility that CD would like to take the job to cap off her career as a HC?
I don't know. If it were a few years ago I'd say yes. In a few years when Geno does retire? Depends on if there is a plan for a younger coach to take over. CD is 5-6 years younger than Geno.Question for you. IYO, if GA decides he's had enough and retires, is there any possibility that CD would like to take the job to cap off her career as a HC?
Question for you. IYO, if GA decides he's had enough and retires, is there any possibility that CD would like to take the job to cap off her career as a HC?
From the interviews I've read about CD, she's completely secure in being the "1A", and not sure she'd want to be the HC, but perhaps in a temp role to assist in the transition. Or, she would stay as the 1A for the new coach for continuity sake. And no idea why this keeps popping in my head, but in either of these scenarios, I see the future HC in waiting to be Carla Berube. Just something about her trajectory and success at Tufts and Princeton.one scenario is having CD take over for a few years and having a younger coach brought in to be groomed.........of course if Diana Taurasi or Sue Bird had an interest that would be a possibility too.....