- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,460
- Reaction Score
- 35,980
I mean, Hurley is his own beast and I don't think it's a reasonable comparison to Miller, for instance.Finding the big name isn’t as important as finding the right guy. Established doesn’t always mean being established at a big school in my opinion. Hurley was coming up a level in competition to us and I would argue we are a better job than indiana.
1. He built 2 different programs up from a bottom and from weaker conferences (and he signed on when we were in the American)
2. He was in our backyard and familiar with the recruiting grounds, being from NJ and coaching in NY and RI
3. He comes from a storied basketball family.
Compare that to Archie, who played at NC State, coached as an Assistant at Arizona, and then took over Dayton. Dayton wasn't a rebuild at all. Before he showed up, they won:
2007: 19
2008: 23
2009: 27
2010: 25
2011: 22
In other words, he took over a successful program and kept it humming.
If Indiana had a guy who was up and coming and how turned around two programs in the area, then I think we're playing a different game.