Things like this are why it’s hard to believe this team is a 5-seed… we are SO much better than we were last year when we were a 5Longest streak since the 2010-11 season. View attachment 84276
Things like this are why it’s hard to believe this team is a 5-seed… we are SO much better than we were last year when we were a 5Longest streak since the 2010-11 season. View attachment 84276
It’s because we’re much better, and the people whining are babies. This team won’t be a 5 seed by tournament time.Things like this are why it’s hard to believe this team is a 5-seed… we are SO much better than we were last year when we were a 5
I sure hope so!It’s because we’re much better, and the people whining are babies. This team won’t be a 5 seed by tournament time.
If we lose on Wednesday we’re going to be a 5 seed no matter what. We basically gotta win out and advance further in the BET than any of the teams currently on the 4 seed line advance in their respective conference tournaments.It’s because we’re much better, and the people whining are babies. This team won’t be a 5 seed by tournament time.
So, not no matter what?If we lose on Wednesday we’re going to be a 5 seed no matter what. We basically gotta win out and advance further in the BET than any of the teams currently on the 4 seed line advance in their respective conference tournaments.
Still think we could sneak up to the last 2 seed though if we win out and win the BET. Our seed range is very wide right now
Really no chance of that 2 unless everyone else just loses all their games. Not sure that can happen since many play each other. But a 3 is possible if we win out and even then we may need help.If we lose on Wednesday we’re going to be a 5 seed no matter what. We basically gotta win out and advance further in the BET than any of the teams currently on the 4 seed line advance in their respective conference tournaments.
Still think we could sneak up to the last 2 seed though if we win out and win the BET. Our seed range is very wide right now
It’s because we’re much better, and the people whining are babies. This team won’t be a 5 seed by tournament time.
If we win the BET that would mean likely beating 3 of PC, Xavier, Marquette, or Creighton. I think we could get there. It would definitely be a 3 seed worthy resumeReally no chance of that 2 unless everyone else just loses all their games. Not sure that can happen since many play each other. But a 3 is possible if we win out and even then we may need help.
I‘m more worried bout reaching the sweet 16 than being seeded to do it.
There is no last 5 seed. The list was given in alphabetical order: Creighton, Miami, St. Mary’s, and UConn.I mean the committee just revealed that not only are we a 5 seed, we are (somehow) the last 5 seed, and it looks like none of our last 4 games are Q1 opportunities. I agree we are a lot better but it looks like we could definitely be a 5.
There is no last 5 seed. The list was given in alphabetical order: Creighton, Miami, St. Mary’s, and UConn.
That’s what I read too. I think we were last. Connecticut would be first alphabeticallyok i was going by this quote from an article...thanks
"It's razor thin," Reynolds said of Creighton just narrowly missing the top 16. "We spent countless hours talking about Creighton. They could have easily been in the 16 spot. In order: Creighton, Miami, Saint Mary's and UConn narrowly missed the top 16."
Each year there is a different mix of different strengths in the hunt. It is relative.Things like this are why it’s hard to believe this team is a 5-seed… we are SO much better than we were last year when we were a 5
We're not a program who rates ourselves by AP poll rankings, but this is the sort of thing that's a decent benchmark for the trajectory of the program. Big picture: we're going in the right direction.Longest streak since the 2010-11 season. View attachment 84276
It’s recency bias. If we started off 9-7/and were on a14-0 run we’d be in the top 16…prob top 12. Instead we‘re on a 9-7 run with a clunker thrown in.I mean the committee just revealed that not only are we a 5 seed, we are (somehow) the last 5 seed, and it looks like none of our last 4 games are Q1 opportunities. I agree we are a lot better but it looks like we could definitely be a 5.
Agreed, Which is why it’s not the quality of the wins down the stretch rather than the importance of putting the slide behind us.It’s recency bias. If we started off 9-7/and were on a14-0 run we’d be in the top 16…prob top 12. Instead we‘re on a 9-7 run with a clunker thrown in.
I would agree a 2 seed is out of range. We're a 5 now with 4 games left, win those I would say a 4 seed no problem. But considering that no BE team was higher than a 4 seed in the first bracket the ceiling for the BE might be a 3 seed at this point.Really no chance of that 2 unless everyone else just loses all their games. Not sure that can happen since many play each other. But a 3 is possible if we win out and even then we may need help.
I‘m more worried bout reaching the sweet 16 than being seeded to do it.
And if we are a 4 in that scenario, you can bet it will be in Houston’s region if they are a 1.Agreed, Which is why it’s not the quality of the wins down the stretch rather than the importance of putting the slide behind us.
If you’re 8-2 in your last 10 say, which would be the case if we go 3-1 down the stretch and win the BET and your resume is now back on par with teams in the 2-3-4 seed line the “what have you done for me lately” takes over and the committee will move us to the three line because it will be about protecting their 1 seeds.
Which is incredibly stupid, because they explicitly discarded the "last 10 games" criterion over a decade ago.It’s recency bias. If we started off 9-7/and were on a14-0 run we’d be in the top 16…prob top 12. Instead we‘re on a 9-7 run with a clunker thrown in.
Really? Didn’t know that. How do u disregard the last 10 games? That’s 40% of the seasonWhich is incredibly stupid, because they explicitly discarded the "last 10 games" criterion over a decade ago.
Sorry, should have been clearer.Really? Didn’t know that. How do u disregard the last 10 games? That’s 40% of the season
Makes sense...and I have no knowledge, it just seems like it's hard to overcome recency bias in a subjective poll IMO.Sorry, should have been clearer.
What they eliminated was giving extra weight to the last 10 games, i.e. did you get hot down the stretch. There was an explicit push to consider the entire body of work over the whole season.
Borges is weird.
Creighton is 18-9 with 4 losses to unranked Texas Tech, Nebraska, BYU, and Arizona St.
UConn is 20-7 with losses to unranked St Johns and Seton Hall.
Creighton has no ranked wins outside the BE, UConn has 2, including one over Alabama.
Creighton has 3 ranked BE wins, UConn has 2.