Please don't elaborate on how much less you could care.
Five assuming Creighton can get to 19 wins. If one of Seton Hall or St. John's gets hot, just maybe we will see six but I doubt it.
Looks like the drugs are kicking in, and you're starting to shizzle.
That early season games count as much as late ones is pretty ridiculous. Teams change, sometimes dramatically over the course of a season. Look at, we’ll us this year. Teams get better too. Look at Creighton. I’d happily have played them in December. Not so excited to play them now. To equate a win over us or Creighton now vs December is foolishness. Honestly all these “scientific” systems are just as much pseudo science as phenology was.
^ And then there's this.
Do you even know what thread you are in?
This post doesn't relate to the Subject, any other posts, or any other posters.
You label things, with nothing at all to back them up, "pretty ridiculous" and "foolishness," as though anybody would go on nothing more than your say so.
And you drive home a non-point with a sloppy, "Look at, we'll us this year," because you don't even respect yourself enough to look over your work before posting it.
We know you're not serious when you open your final paragraph with, "Honestly..." Don't you think we instantly consider if anything before that was been honest? You contrast "science" and pseudo science with the same lack of substance as your other empty claims, all to set up your misspelled attempt at a mic drop. Phrenomenal! Bavo!
Just go back to your coaching candidate profiles.
