- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,292
- Reaction Score
- 35,180
What a take.But I am watching an offense today that isn’t any more sophisticated than UConns. That I do know.
What a take.But I am watching an offense today that isn’t any more sophisticated than UConns. That I do know.
Seriously. Do people think all offense should be backdoor cuts and sets from Hoosiers?Every big trip URI generates either an open 3 or a shot in the paint. They're having trouble finishing, but looking at where they're shooting from and when in the clock tells me this offense is pretty good.
No "dribble it down, then take a long, step-back 2 with 1 second left" to be seen.
This is so false. This URI offense has more passing and cutting than UConn. Don't watch the ball watch the guys off ball then go watch any UConn game. There is no way these offenses are similar.
Seriously. Do people think all offense should be backdoor cuts and sets from Hoosiers?
Maybe, this is the first full game I’ve watched them.
But I am watching an offense today that isn’t any more sophisticated than UConns. That I do know.
The difference is they appear to have players who can make threes.
That's pretty much a basketball offense, not hero ball. They also have run pick and rolls effectively, though the OU size has bothered the URI guards and led to some turnovers.Drive, dish, get open shots.
That's pretty much a basketball offense, not hero ball. They also have run pick and rolls effectively, though the OU size has bothered the URI guards and led to some turnovers.
UConn's offense barely starts until there are 10 seconds left in the clock. It all ends up being long 2s as the clock expires. URI's offense is generating good looks.
The movement is quicker. Expected when you have five smaller players on the team and the team has played together for a while. The limitation for UConn was having a combo guard run things, relatively poor 3 pt shooters, and bigs that are still learning or will never develop into decent players.This is so false. This URI offense has more passing and cutting than UConn. Don't watch the ball watch the guys off ball then go watch any UConn game. There is no way these offenses are similar.
Hopefully uri survives. The usually gag here.
Last 2 possessions have looked like UConn. Matthews bailed them out with the +1 and then Terrell jacked up a long-range 3 that was destined to brick.
Not great.
The announcers keep saying it, and usually it means they're wrong. But they aren't: URI is out of gas. They don't have the quality depth outside of their top 6 or so to compete with OU. Not a problem if he were at UConn (unlike what KO did in running JA down).Last 2 possessions have looked like UConn. Matthews bailed them out with the +1 and then Terrell jacked up a long-range 3 that was destined to brick.
Not great.
Sorry. Thought you were making the silly take others have been.I'm agreeing with them being a good offense, nothing like UConn's. Drive, dish and getting open shots is exactly what a good offense does. My point was for 3 straight possessions when OU was starting to pull away (up 8 I think), the ball stopped when each player touched it. They were frustrated with the length of OU and for 3 straight possessions, they played one on one into a turnover or bad shot. The difference between UConn and URI is that URI understands how to overcome that type of play. Coaching has a lot to do with it. Like I said, the very next possession was a great drive and dish to a missed wide open dunk. UConn would have kept giving it to Larrier for a step back air ball fade away.
No, I was totally serious about that. URI's run really good offense pretty much all game until the last two possessions. That long 3 from Terrell after 8 seconds of stand-still dribbling with 2 seconds left on the clock is the first page in KO's playbook.This can't be serious. Every team in the country has hero ball possessions. It happens but it isn't offense unlike UConn.
Yeah I mostly agree with this. Also.... kids are kids. Even if you coach them they'll sometimes be dumb.The announcers keep saying it, and usually it means they're wrong. But they aren't: URI is out of gas. They don't have the quality depth outside of their top 6 or so to compete with OU.