- Joined
- Apr 25, 2014
- Messages
- 5,290
- Reaction Score
- 19,770
No thanks on Sulaimon. Way too much baggage for someone who doesn't fill a clear need.
Yup. And he thinks he's Kobe - plays hero ball at every opportunity.No thanks on Sulaimon. Way too much baggage for someone who doesn't fill a clear need.
The idea of adding Miller at the 4 would be the equivalent of looking at Jessica Alba nude 2 years ago for the first time. That would be very exciting indeed.
When Sulaimon graduates in June I recommend doing the unthinkable and going hard after him as a grad transfer. I know this would put me in the .0000009% of fans that want this kid at UConn but in my most humble of opinions RASHEED is a guy I desperately want. With the addition of Rasheed and "Big Lanky" we go from playing a home first round NIT game against VCU...to all of a sudden thinking about buying tickets to the NRG Arena next April. The last place I want to see this kid end up is at Memphis or Gonzaga. He was addition by subtraction at Duke. At UConn it could be the Rodney & Rasheed Show. Just call it the R & R Show.
http://espn.go.com/college-sports/basketball/recruiting/player/_/id/67405/rasheed-sulaimon
No thanks on Sulaimon. Way too much baggage for someone who doesn't fill a clear need.
Even if we ignore the multiple sexual assault allegations (you can't), I don't think it's a coincidence that Duke was instantly better immediately after he got the boot. And I'm not talking a little bit better; they looked like a different team.
Sulaimon has too many red flags and not enough upside.
Pass.
It is still all "he said...she said" (without going into a diatribe on these types of cases). Considering the culture surrounding the University mentioned by other posters relating to these sexual assault type issues on campus...logic would dictate we would take a pass on RS. Everything though is analogous to the Mike Dixon situation. It is hard for me to respect the logic though using the "first and only player in Coach K's tenure...ect ect... as the main reason for not having interest." There are red flags all over the place at Duke that don't relate to the RS case that directly or indirectly involve coaches and administrators.On Sulaimon, being the first and only player in Coach K's tenure at Duke to be kicked off the team is a pretty big red flag. I'll pass too.
No kids with sexual assault issues on the team please. We can find similar production without the baggage.
I'm not necessarily accusing him of anything, and you're right, at this point it is all "he said she said". But Duke still felt it was necessary to kick the kid off the team, and the direct quote was that RS “repeatedly struggled to meet the necessary obligations.” This wasn't just a situation where he had one singular issue and the team kicked him off. The kid apparently had a history of issues at Duke, and Coach K felt it was necessary to make RS the first of over 200 players he coached at Duke to be dismissed from the program. That's all one big red flag to me.It is still all "he said...she said" (without going into a diatribe on these types of cases). Considering the culture surrounding the University mentioned by other posters relating to these sexual assault type issues on campus...logic would dictate we would take a pass on RS. Everything though is analogous to the Mike Dixon situation. It is hard for me to respect the logic though using the "first and only player in Coach K's tenure...ect ect... as the main reason for not having interest." There are red flags all over the place at Duke that don't relate to the RS case that directly or indirectly involve coaches and administrators.
No kids with sexual assault issues on the team please. We can find similar production without the baggage.
Depending on how things shake out on the recruiting/transfer trail from now until the start of next year...a very good case can be made that this roster as assembled is bound for the NIT again. There are pretty good teams that simply are not good enough to make the cut due to many factors. In my opinion (which is usually bullish) there is serious cause for concern with our roster. I talked to a friend yesterday though who told me he would feel fine just rolling with what we have. This guy usually can't see through his blue goggles and always believes players will naturally develop over time. Miller seems like a MUST get to me.
I'm not necessarily accusing him of anything, and you're right, at this point it is all "he said she said". But Duke still felt it was necessary to kick the kid off the team, and the direct quote was that RS “repeatedly struggled to meet the necessary obligations.” This wasn't just a situation where he had one singular issue and the team kicked him off. The kid apparently had a history of issues at Duke, and Coach K felt it was necessary to make RS the first of over 200 players he coached at Duke to be dismissed from the program. That's all one big red flag to me.
Also, I respect that you are a major proponent for second chances, but that Ben Gordon hypothetical is kind of ridiculous.
Why is the hypothetical ridiculous? It was an assault BG was arrested for. If it were a player of lesser talent like EW things would have been different right? My point simply is BG was a a mega talent that was indispensable to the team winning games. K did not need this 5 star McDonald's AA to win it all. He had 4 or 5 others. The point of the hypo was to bring to your attention what would constitute a reg flag (for you) for the purposes of a transfer. We are talking about character here. A punch in the face with a bloody lip in which an arrest was made vs. the RS situation. There are always players that may not fit perfectly into a system for various reasons or make mistakes which can be part of a growth process. What the question was really trying to gauge was what YOU think may raise a red flag with a transfer. If Gordon were kicked off the team for the offense he would have transferred somewhere. That is why is was a hypothetical. I am assuming there would have been a red flag on BG also from your perspective based on what Calhoun could have done. We all know how BG responded to this incident. He was arguably 1 of the best ever at UConn and my fav player of all time.
As @CallMeBruce points out, that's kind of the reason why I don't see the Ben Gordon hypothetical relating the RS situation. In fact, I don't know if there are any other transfer/dismissal situations that can relate to Rasheed Sulaimon.Why is the hypothetical ridiculous? It was an assault BG was arrested for. If it were a player of lesser talent like EW things would have been different right? My point simply is BG was a a mega talent that was indispensable to the team winning games. K did not need this 5 star McDonald's AA to win it all. He had 4 or 5 others. The point of the hypo was to bring to your attention what would constitute a reg flag (for you) for the purposes of a transfer. We are talking about character here. A punch in the face with a bloody lip in which an arrest was made vs. the RS situation. There are always players that may not fit perfectly into a system for various reasons or make mistakes which can be part of a growth process. What the question was really trying to gauge was what YOU think may raise a red flag with a transfer. If Gordon were kicked off the team for the offense he would have transferred somewhere. That is why is was a hypothetical. I am assuming there would have been a red flag on BG also from your perspective based on what Calhoun could have done. We all know how BG responded to this incident. He was arguably 1 of the best ever at UConn and my fav player of all time.
As I've said before, the reasons that this specific transfer situation is a major red flag:What the question was really trying to gauge was what YOU think may raise a red flag with a transfer.