Last I heard it was to open in April....that still a realistic target?
Maybe just in time for the visits of Asia Durr and Katie Samuelson...et al?
- My impression is, the limitation of this terrific design never seemed to be “fore-thought,” but their commitment to realistically stay within their $32M budget. Does your concept do that? If not, how long would you have had us delay, in the hope of raising more funds,... someday,... maybe?I wish the building committee had a little fore-thought and built a NEW Gampel on the FB field and transformed the present Gampel into the training facility! They could have had seating for 15,000 fans all real seats, no bleacher seats! An Arena like the PSU Bryce Jordan Center, Mohegan Sun Arena (5,000 more seats), L'ville KFC YUM Center,.. $ talks...
Good points.The issue with Uconn is the campus is a small town campus. It is not a city campus nor even a large town campus. Access to campus is bad, not terrible but not great and traffic/parking for a 10,000 seat facility is a pain - add 50% more and it will be 100% worse. So what ever facility they might build on campus is not likely to increase capacity, nor is it going to be able to genera additional revenue as a multi-purpose venue. And having food courts or retail outlets is a non-starter because there will be no walk-thru traffic on non-event days.
There is a reason the football stadium is not on campus and that Uconn BB plays at off campus facilities. If they were to upgrade significantly it would probably be in Hartford or Manchester which definitely creates a different vibe for students. And spending a boat load on Gampel is what my old design teacher used to call 'tying a ribbon on an udder'. The process of trying to upgrade even by taking out tons of concrete just to add chair backs would be very expensive, and you would still have an old, dated facility. It really is a 'tear-down' and rebuild and that sends the costs way up. And as everyone says - football drives the bus and if B1G is really a possibility, the money that would be required to upgrade the football stadium to B1G minimums will take all the financial resources available.
Have to admit those are great points - and I agree it's unlikely that Gampel will ever be torn down and rebuilt. I also agree that the University will likely put most, or all, of it's resources in upgrading the football facility. IIRC, the facility was designed to add 10-15,000 seats fairly easily, and maybe with the new HC and hopefully new direction of the FB program, that will come sooner rather than later.The issue with Uconn is the campus is a small town campus. It is not a city campus nor even a large town campus. Access to campus is bad, not terrible but not great and traffic/parking for a 10,000 seat facility is a pain - add 50% more and it will be 100% worse. So what ever facility they might build on campus is not likely to increase capacity, nor is it going to be able to genera additional revenue as a multi-purpose venue. And having food courts or retail outlets is a non-starter because there will be no walk-thru traffic on non-event days.
There is a reason the football stadium is not on campus and that Uconn BB plays at off campus facilities. If they were to upgrade significantly it would probably be in Hartford or Manchester which definitely creates a different vibe for students. And spending a boat load on Gampel is what my old design teacher used to call 'tying a ribbon on an udder'. The process of trying to upgrade even by taking out tons of concrete just to add chair backs would be very expensive, and you would still have an old, dated facility. It really is a 'tear-down' and rebuild and that sends the costs way up. And as everyone says - football drives the bus and if B1G is really a possibility, the money that would be required to upgrade the football stadium to B1G minimums will take all the financial resources available.
Good point - a cushion upgrade would be incredibly easy and quite cost efficient. Most people want chair backs and that is much more complicated because in order to accommodate any current design they would probably need to take 4-6" of concrete off of each seating level.Have to admit those are great points - and I agree it's unlikely that Gampel will ever be torn down and rebuilt. I also agree that the University will likely put most, or all, of it's resources in upgrading the football facility. IIRC, the facility was designed to add 10-15,000 seats fairly easily, and maybe with the new HC and hopefully new direction of the FB program, that will come sooner rather than later.
BUT for the time being, I think at the very least, an easy fix would be to put nice cushions on the concrete benches - I can't imagine that it would cost any more than say $25,000 to make those "seats" way more comfortable.
UCONN would have had to transform Gampel to whatever they are doing with the training facility! It couldn't be used as it now is set up! But a new Gampel really is a necessity now, have you seen the condition of the roof?Not sure how Gampel would have served as a practice facility if the goal was two complete facilities serving men and women.
There is not enough room where Gampel is located to do that.UCONN would have had to transform Gampel to whatever they are doing with the training facility! It couldn't be used as it now is set up! But a new Gampel really is a necessity now, have you seen the condition of the roof?