Aneesah Morrow | Page 7 | The Boneyard

Aneesah Morrow

Status
Not open for further replies.
What we can be sure of :
1 . Aneessa is an AA kind of player
2. UCONN should be interrested
3. Doug will tell Geno all he has to know
 
I'm guessing having Morrow to pair up front with AE just might make a 3 guard offense that much more of a viable option.....just my .02.
We don't need Morrow to make a 3 guard offense as long as we have Aubrey, Ice, Ayanna and Jana in the mix. Personally, I see Nika, Paige, Azzi and Aaliyah as the starters...but this is for a later thread(s). :)
 
She's shorter than Caroline. There is a Caroline connection, she gave Caroline one of her first elbows to the head.
OUCH! that rings a bell somewhere in my noggin! Apologies to Caroline!
 
So, do we know if any of the coaches are following Morrow (usually Morgan) on any of the social media apps or if any of our players are linked to Morrow on said social apps since the announcement? That is a telltale sign of strong interest. Without any of that, color me dubious on reports of interest.
South Carolina, Baylor, LSU, Tennessee, Kansas St, and Mississippi coaches among others.......didn't see UConn but I only took a quick look....
 
We don't need Morrow to make a 3 guard offense as long as we have Aubrey, Ice, Ayanna and Jana in the mix. Personally, I see Nika, Paige, Azzi and Aaliyah as the starters...but this is for a later thread(s). :)
Me too! That should be the presumptive starting point for best starting lineup, with or without Morrow or Prince. Until proven otherwise I think we are far more likely to start 2 bigs than 4 guards. I think short of a major portal transfer, either Ice or Jana will start at the 5, but even if they are not yet ready, Aaliyah at the 5 and Aubrey at the 4 would be a good combination.
 
.-.
South Carolina, Baylor, LSU, Tennessee, Kansas St, and Mississippi coaches among others.......didn't see UConn but I only took a quick look....
Again.............. she's not a fit EVERYWHERE, but she's a fit SOMEWHERE. She will find her new home and soon.
 
South Carolina, Baylor, LSU, Tennessee, Kansas St, and Mississippi coaches among others.......didn't see UConn but I only took a quick look....
I can see Morrow as attractive to South Carolina - and vice versa
 
I can see Morrow as attractive to South Carolina - and vice versa
Me too. She can definitely be for Cardozo what Saxton was for Boston, a really active strong partner in the paint. And she packs a much bigger offensive wallop than anyone currently on SC’s roster.

This is also the reason why she probably won’t fit in at LSU. Reese could benefit from having her as a partner, but I doubt she wants the competition.
 
At a UConn game she walked past Bruno when he was trying to talk to her. Respect?
So you know that she disrespects him? Or are you citing one moment out of several months interaction, when it appeared she didn't wish to communicate with him?
 
Morrow is a great player, but Uconn has a 14 player roster with six bigs already ... do we really want to throw a wrench into it by bringing another player on board that is likely to mess with our current freshmen and sophomores development? Maybe we do, but ...
I think we have to define BIG. To me, it is not simply person 6' or taller ( Caroline? Pattrerson?). It is a person whose "natural" position is the post. Typically, an individual will be 6'3" or larger in the women's game. So Edwards , Ice, Jana and Amari all qualify. I don't see Patterson and Caroline as players inclined to those spots. I see them more as wings. But so what? Morrow is a special talent whatever her size, and her talent would be another weapon in UCONN's arsenal. Who, for example, is likely to contribute more in any given game; Morrow or Patterson or DeBerry? But I think you are likely right. That she is not an ideal fit at UCONN. My only argument to the contrary is; We don't know how Ice will perform, in her first year, post surgery; and Jana is more unknown than that. So, we have Edwards and two question marks ( assuming that DeBerry doesn't come back to Storrs as a new version of Tina Charles ). Morrow is not a question mark as a player in the post. She is an extraordinary player. As an aside, I don't see how her presence would impact the playing time of either of the two guards, or the one wing, who arrive next season as freshmen.
 
.-.
So, do we know if any of the coaches are following Morrow (usually Morgan) on any of the social media apps or if any of our players are linked to Morrow on said social apps since the announcement? That is a telltale sign of strong interest. Without any of that, color me dubious on reports of interest.
Aneesa isn’t following UConn or any UConn players. There are several current and former LSU players, though
 
I think we have to define BIG. To me, it is not simply person 6' or taller ( Caroline? Pattrerson?). It is a person whose "natural" position is the post. Typically, an individual will be 6'3" or larger in the women's game. So Edwards , Ice, Jana and Amari all qualify. I don't see Patterson and Caroline as players inclined to those spots. I see them more as wings. But so what? Morrow is a special talent whatever her size, and her talent would be another weapon in UCONN's arsenal. Who, for example, is likely to contribute more in any given game; Morrow or Patterson or DeBerry? But I think you are likely right. That she is not an ideal fit at UCONN. My only argument to the contrary is; We don't know how Ice will perform, in her first year, post surgery; and Jana is more unknown than that. So, we have Edwards and two question marks ( assuming that DeBerry doesn't come back to Storrs as a new version of Tina Charles ). Morrow is not a question mark as a player in the post. She is an extraordinary player. As an aside, I don't see how her presence would impact the playing time of either of the two guards, or the one wing, who arrive next season as freshmen.
I think the jury is out (as it should be on a single year player) whether Patterson is a wing or a 'big' - she doesn't shoot from anywhere beyond 10' and is to date a rebounder and paint player offensively. Caroline is certainly a wing, and Aubrey is trying to develop her outside shot to expand her game out of the paint.

I think DeBerry is the Dorka replacement in the lineup in terms of size and general deployment. And while we fans do not know about Ice and Jana, I am pretty sure the coaches have a pretty good handle on them. Geno made his comments about next year being the strongest team since 2016 before Prince or Morrow, or any notable Bigs were in the portal, so he seems pretty confident with the current lineup.

Every fans likes a stacked roster, but sometimes less is more - adding any player is going to have an impact on the team, but chemistry can be fragile. Taking a player used to 35 minutes and 24 shot attempts per game and playing them 25 minute and limiting their shots to 15/game may not make for a happy camper. And playing them 35 min and allowing the 24 shots may not make for a happy roster. That is a discussion Geno is going to need to have with any portal player. Lou is a perfect example based on the recent articles - he told her she wouldn't start and she wasn't going to get a lot of minutes, but if she was OK with that then he wanted her on the team - turned out he was wrong as injures started before the end of summer, but not everyone in the portal is going to jump at 'reduced role' just to play at Uconn.
 
but not everyone in the portal is going to jump at 'reduced role' just to play at Uconn.
I think any player in the portal that expects to improve their play to get to the WNBA knows that only a few coaches can help get them there, with Geno being an almost sure thing. Just show them how Lou and Dorka did.
 
Is there room enough on LSU for both Reese and Morrow?;)
Of course. When you have a great coach and a willing kid, you can make anything work. Geno could as well. But what about Morrow? What is her nature? What is her goal? The most interesting aspect in all of this is that UCONN really isn't looking. Last year, they
were ( due to injuries). So we don't need to scheme or grovel. We just need to see which kids, if any, are interested.
 
I think the jury is out (as it should be on a single year player) whether Patterson is a wing or a 'big' - she doesn't shoot from anywhere beyond 10' and is to date a rebounder and paint player offensively. Caroline is certainly a wing, and Aubrey is trying to develop her outside shot to expand her game out of the paint.

I think DeBerry is the Dorka replacement in the lineup in terms of size and general deployment. And while we fans do not know about Ice and Jana, I am pretty sure the coaches have a pretty good handle on them. Geno made his comments about next year being the strongest team since 2016 before Prince or Morrow, or any notable Bigs were in the portal, so he seems pretty confident with the current lineup.

Every fans likes a stacked roster, but sometimes less is more - adding any player is going to have an impact on the team, but chemistry can be fragile. Taking a player used to 35 minutes and 24 shot attempts per game and playing them 25 minute and limiting their shots to 15/game may not make for a happy camper. And playing them 35 min and allowing the 24 shots may not make for a happy roster. That is a discussion Geno is going to need to have with any portal player. Lou is a perfect example based on the recent articles - he told her she wouldn't start and she wasn't going to get a lot of minutes, but if she was OK with that then he wanted her on the team - turned out he was wrong as injures started before the end of summer, but not everyone in the portal is going to jump at 'reduced role' just to play at Uconn.
there are no similarities between Dorka and anyone currently on the roster except in one case height.
 
.-.
there are no similarities between Dorka and anyone currently on the roster except in one case height.
Actually ... given that we are comparing a fifth year player to a second year player, and one getting 33 minutes a game to one getting 8 minutes per game their are similarities: Dorka was a better 2 point shooter while DeBerry was better from three, Dorka a much better defensive rebounder while DeBerry they were the same as offensive rebounders. They both played outside in most of the time.

Dorka was definitely the better player, but you would expect that consistency from a player getting those sorts of minutes, and you would expect inconsistency from a player who was getting a few minutes here and there. And you would also expect that from a player in her 5th year vs a player still learning in her second year. If you want an example of a player being recruited over by a transfer, DeBerry is an example.
 
There is a little doubt that Morrow is a great player and will make a difference for any team in the country. That said, i was more excited about Morrow after her first season then last season. Last season she was a ball hog with little interest in defense. UConn does need that Morrow. If Morrow (which i don't believe) is willing to accept being the 3rd-4th option on offense and work hard on defense. then UConn should look at her hard. I would think SC or LSU will be her first choices...
 
There is a little doubt that Morrow is a great player and will make a difference for any team in the country. That said, i was more excited about Morrow after her first season then last season. Last season she was a ball hog with little interest in defense. UConn does need that Morrow. If Morrow (which i don't believe) is willing to accept being the 3rd-4th option on offense and work hard on defense. then UConn should look at her hard. I would think SC or LSU will be her first choices...
Don't agree about SC, if your assessment of her lack of interest in playing D is accurate. Dawn makes kids compete for playing time too, and judging from how good her teams are at defense, I imagine showing defensive intensity in practice is required. Maybe it's different at LSU and the other portal patchwork teams, but I'm dubious. Kim's lineup evolved over the season, which suggests she's assessing and judging these things very carefully.
 
Actually ... given that we are comparing a fifth year player to a second year player, and one getting 33 minutes a game to one getting 8 minutes per game their are similarities: Dorka was a better 2 point shooter while DeBerry was better from three, Dorka a much better defensive rebounder while DeBerry they were the same as offensive rebounders. They both played outside in most of the time.

Dorka was definitely the better player, but you would expect that consistency from a player getting those sorts of minutes, and you would expect inconsistency from a player who was getting a few minutes here and there. And you would also expect that from a player in her 5th year vs a player still learning in her second year. If you want an example of a player being recruited over by a transfer, DeBerry is an example.
I hate to say it but I think your optimism for DeBerry will prove to be in vain. She is by all regards a great kid and teammate but she has been the last player off the bench for two years now. I think we can right her up as a career reserve at UConn. I just don't see a jump in PT coming.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,199
Messages
4,556,548
Members
10,442
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom