Analysis: Emotional pull of Big East vs. revenue boost of Big 12. Why UConn may be lured by Power 5 invite (Mike Anthony) | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Analysis: Emotional pull of Big East vs. revenue boost of Big 12. Why UConn may be lured by Power 5 invite (Mike Anthony)

Let's look at what happened with TV. 35 years ago, there were three (soon to be 4) networks, and a bunch of local channels showing reruns. I have no idea how many outlets are producing original video content today, but it is a huge number. The idea that a handful of schools will consolidate all the power seems unlikely when there is no way to consolidate access to content. ESPN held life and death sway over the Big East 20 or 12 years ago. Now? They are just a glorified production company with a few middle aged exjock talking heads tacked onto each end of the sports broadcast. ESPN's per box lifeline is drying up. That carriage fee both enabled ESPN to pay a lot for content, and created a huge incentive for ESPN to maintain its semi-monopoly position in sports broadcasting. That is over.

I think every major content provider will at least look into reselling sports, but long-term, I think the sports content producers (i.e. the leagues or schools themselves) are going to be selling their own content directly. That could take a while though.
Again, I agree 100%. But in the end, I think schools will all earn much less. My point is, Apple and the pac 12 can be a game changer, especially how we consume pac 12 sports. But for the individual schools, it will be far worse than what they were used to earning.
 
If my theory in Post #30 is correct, then the Big 12 may be on exactly the right track. Just grab every decent property they can, because the next contract after ESPN may be direct and they need a critical mass to go direct.

This is why the Pac 12 contract is so important. If Apple enters the game as a reseller, then ESPN is truly finished as the dominant player in sports broadcasting. It could also unleash a landgrab for sports content.
 
Biggest concern from the article was how he mentioned coaches and players hate travel…..our whole season would be one long flight after another…I don’t think the school will look at it as a reason not to go, but it can clearly be an impediment to success.

I was surprised he brought that up. Does anyone think they like the bus rides?
 
Again, I agree 100%. But in the end, I think schools will all earn much less.

I do not agree on this. While there is downward pricing pressure, the schools are also disintermediating two enormous middlemen, the cable provider and ESPN. The schools will keep a much bigger portion of the value of their content.
 
Don't we have over 90 pages of this on another thread???
 
.-.
Sports are the one thing saving network TV. Sports become more and more valuable as one of the few broadcasts that are meant to be watched live.
 
I do not agree on this. While there is downward pricing pressure, the schools are also disintermediating two enormous middlemen, the cable provider and ESPN. The schools will keep a much bigger portion of the value of their content.
With a much smaller pool willing to pay.
 
Miami
Va Tech
WVU
Temple (FB)
Cincinnati
Louisville
USF
Rutgers
ND (BB)
That wasn't the Big East, they were all add ons many years later. Big East is probably the most true to it's original form out of all the conferences now.
 
That wasn't the Big East, they were all add ons many years later. Big East is probably the most true to it's original form out of all the conferences now.
of course it was the Big East. The best combination of a basketball and football conference.
 
he's a great basketball coach, but let's leave the strategic business decisions to the professionals.
You mean the ( meatheads ) professionals that got us where we are today. Those professionals???
 
.-.
of course it was the Big East. The best combination of a basketball and football conference.
It came to be the Big East at one point just like how the Big 12, Big 10, SEC, and ACC are all different now but it was nothing like the original Big East. The Big East is the closest to it's original form out of all the conferences.
 
If it was that big of a concern, I don’t think UCLA and USC would’ve agreed to join a conference where their second nearest conference mate is in eastern Nebraska.

It’s just the way of the world now.
UCLA and usc have also not moved yet so we don’t have an answer to the question…..they obviously felt it was worth the risk, that doesn’t make them correct in their assumption…they also have each other and probably a few more west coast teams in the future we would be on even more of an island
 
Forget the B12 … I want to go to The Garden and dominate the BE Tournament every year. I’m selfish like that.
 
Don't we have over 90 pages of this on another thread???
Yeah it’s kind of funny but only in a boneyard way …in all other venues it would be described as sad. This one topic has everyone hating on everyone. It has more people disagreeing with each other than the play the two big men opinions during the season.
 
.-.
Gosh darn it, I'm so conflicted and @nelsonmuntz didn't help

I guess the best thing about this whole process, It's not my decision

I'll just buy tickets and hope for the best

Whatever Hurley wants, I want
Hurley can express his opinions to management. But what he prefers has no bearing in the decision. This is a university level decision. It a basketball decision.
 
In the last 40 years, the diversity of channels and then the internet actually fragmented the audience for content. In the 60's, 70's and 80's, everyone watched three networks, CBS, NBC and ABC. The ratings for those shows were incredible by today's standards, even though a lot of those shows sucked. Then, as cable channels proliferated, a few people managed to push out syndicated original content like the Star Trek franchise or Baywatch on local channels and places like USA Network. Content for kids started showing up outside the major networks, and ringing up pretty good numbers for non-network shows.

Then HBO started making original content. The Sopranos changed everything. There was NO WAY that show could go on broadcast television, and while its audience numbers were big, they were nothing like the broadcast audiences for even mediocre shows. But it simultaneously changed both television and the movie industry forever. All the cable channels started developing original content, and the networks re-thought what qualified as a hit. Movie producers realized that cable might be a better platform for content targeting people over 30, and started churning out the best television in history. Most importantly, no one needed to produce weak, vanilla content that had to appeal/not offend 20 million people. Artists could make interesting, niche content.

The West Wing would have definitely been cancelled in 2001 or 2002 if not for the Sopranos. The West Wing was expensive to make and it was generally not a Top 20 show. But it was prestige television and NBC was light on that kind of programming at the time. Then AMC, which was hanging by a thread, produced Mad Men and Breaking Bad, which saved the network and launched AMC into this weird hybrid of niche, prestige television and horror. Showtime produced some hits like Shameless and Dexter. FX, TNT and USA all got into the game, along with a lot of the niche channels like Nickelodeon.

Not everyone wanted to watch award winning TV. MTV kicked off the dramality genre, which took over channels like Bravo and TLC. I am guessing that the founders of Bravo are appalled (if they are still alive) that their channel, which was originally targeted at the Lincoln Center set, is now primarily broadcasting middle-aged women wearing $5,000 outfits scream nonsense at each other in front of a drunk Andy Cohen.

Netflix was initially a renter of movies, but transitioned into an incredibly profitable movie and TV studio, churning out mediocre content at good prices that keep its subscribers just happy enough to pay the next month's bill. The major networks and studios all raced to get in the game, with Disney/Hulu (ABC), Peacock (NBC) and Paramount (CBS) all trying to keep up with changes they fought for years. Being a reseller (like a network or certainly a cable provider) is basically a dead business model. The content producers will own the future because they don't need much help from the networks, and they need none from cable.

So where is sports? Kind of like TV was when the Sopranos first went on the air. People are realizing that they can watch what they want, not what ESPN decides they should see. I have some ideas about what might happen, but the only thing I am 100% certain of is that sports broadcasting will look hugely different in 10 years.
Agree with this take.

Carriage is yesterdays news. Now? Have great content, or parish. This makes valuable brands important.

Men’s Basketball is undervalued and UConn women are massively undervalued due to its cultural influence.
 
Hurley can express his opinions to management. But what he prefers has no bearing in the decision. This is a university level decision. It a basketball decision.

That's OK, I still want whatever Hurley wants
 
That wasn't the Big East, they were all add ons many years later. Big East is probably the most true to it's original form out of all the conferences now.
Four current members were members for the entirety of the conference. The BE would have to cut three schools for that to be half the conference.
 
Come on, don't play this game.
It appears that you are the one playing games.

A significantly larger percentage of the B1G, SEC and ACC traditional members are still in their respective conferences yet you are claiming the Big East is most true to its original form.

Your statement needs to be taken with an exceptionally large grain of salt.
 
.-.
It came to be the Big East at one point just like how the Big 12, Big 10, SEC, and ACC are all different now but it was nothing like the original Big East. The Big East is the closest to it's original form out of all the conferences.

Nah - Pac12.

Six of the schools there have been there for over a century. Two others for almost 50.

And then the Big 10. SEC. ACC.

The Big East is simply the biggest loser.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,228
Messages
4,558,323
Members
10,443
Latest member
Billy Boy


Top Bottom